CO2DE: A decision support system for collaborative design

Journal of Engineering Design

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 31-48

  Kim, Duckyoung ^a   Xirouchakis, Paul ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Collaborative design; Decision; Decision support system; Design concept selection; Filtering procedure; Satellite

Indexed keywords

EID: 73049110053     PISSN: 09544828     EISSN: 14661837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09544820802132444     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Allen, B., 2001. On the aggregation of preferences in engineering design. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference and Compters and Informations in Engineering Conference, Pittsburgh, USA.
2. Altšuller, G.S., 1984. Creativity as an exact science: the theory of the solution of inventive problems. New York: Gordon & Beach.
3. Bracewell, R. and Sharpe, J., 1996. Functional descriptions used in computer support for qualitative scheme generation SCHEMEBUILDER. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing, 10, 333-345.
4. Darr, T. and Birmingham, W., 2000. Part-selection triptych: a representation problem properties and problem definition, and problem-solving method. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing, 14, 39-51.
5. Deng, Y.-M., Britton, G., and Tor, S., 2000. Constraint-based functional design verification for conceptual design. Computer-Aided Design, 32, 889-899.
6. Ericsson, A. and Erixon, G., 1999. Controlling design variants: modular product platforms. Dearborn: Society of Manufacturing Engineers.
7. Feng, C.-X. and Kusiak, A., 1995. Constraint-based design of parts. Computer-Aided Design, 27 (5), 343-352.
8. Finch, W. and Ward, A., 1997. A set-based system for eliminating infeasible designs in engineering problems dominated by uncertainty. Proceedings of the 1997 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Sacramento, USA.
9. Harmer, J., Weaver, M., and Wallace, M., 1998. Design-LED component selection. Computer-Aided Design, 30, 391-405.
10. Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H., 1976. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. NewYork: John Wiley & Sons.
11. Kim, D., Bufardi, A., and Xirouchakis, P., 2006. Compatibility measurement in collaborative conceptual design. CIRP Annals, 55 (1), 151-154.
12. Kim, D., Bufardi, A., and Xirouchakis, P., 2007. An architecture for collaborative conceptual design support systems. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology, Bath, UK.
13. Kleiner, S., Anderl, R., and Gräb, R., 2003. A collaborative design system for product data integration. Journal of Engineering Design, 14 (4), 421-428.
14. Lallouet, A. and Legtchenko, A., 2006. Partially defined constraints in constraint-based design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 20, 297-311.
15. Michelena, N. and Papalambros, P., 1997. A hypergraph framework for optimal model-based decomposition of design problem. Computational Optimization and Applications, 8, 173-196.
16. Mittal, S. and Falkenhainer, B., 1990. Dynamic constraint satisfaction problems. Proceedings of the 8th AAAI Conference, Boston, USA, 25-32.
17. Nadel, B. and Lin, J., 1991. Automobile transmission design as a constraint satisfaction problem: modelling the kinematic level. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 5, 137-171.
18. Noca, M. and Krpoun, R., 2006. SwissCube project specifications. EPFL Space Center, http://space.epfl.ch
19. Pahl, G, and Beitz, W., 1988. Engineering design - a systematic approach. London: Springer-Verlag.
20. Parunak, V., Ward, A., Fleisher, M., Sauter, J., and Chang, T.-C., 1997. Distributed component-centered design as agentbased distributed constraint optimization. AAAI'97Workshop on Constraints and Agents, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
21. Reddy, S., Fertig, K., and Smith, D., 1996. Constraint management methodology for conceptual design tradeoff studies. Proceedings of the 1996 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Irvine, USA.
22. Sabin, D. and Freuder, E.C., 1996. Configuration as composite constraint satisfaction. Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence and Manufacturing Research Planning Workshop, Albuquerque, USA, 153-161.
23. Sam-Haround, D. and Faltings, B.V., 1996. Solving non-binary convex CSPs in continuous domains. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1118, 410-424.
24. Sarafin, T.P., 1997. Spacecraft structures and mechanisms. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
25. See, T.-K. and Lewis, K., 2004. A formal approach to handling conflicts in multi-attribute group decision making. Proceedings of the ASME Design Technical Conferences, Salt Lake City, USA.
26. Sen, P., 2001. Communicating preferences in multiple-criteria decision making: the role of the designer. Journal of Engineering Design, 12 (1), 15-24.
27. Snavely, G. and Papalambros, P., 1993, Abstraction as a configuration design methodology. Proceedings of the 19th ASME Design Automation Conference, Albuquerque, USA.
28. Stone, R.B., McAdams, D.A., and Kayyalethekkel, V.J., 2004. A product architecture-based conceptual DFA technique. Design studies, 25, 301-325.
29. Ullman, D., 1992. The mechanical design process. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
30. Ulrich, K. and Eppinger, S., 2004. Product design and development. 3rd ed. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.