Using analysis of computer-mediated synchronous interactions to understand co-designers' activities and reasoning

Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design

Volumn DS 42, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Lund, Kristine ^a   Prudhomme, Guy ^b   Cassier, Jean Laurent ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LUMIÈRE LYON 2   (France)

^b UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Computer mediated human interactions; Conversation analysis; Design experiment; Interaction analysis

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION; COLLABORATIVE DESIGN; COLLABORATIVE WORK; CONVERSATION ANALYSIS; DESIGN STUDIES; EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT; GLOBAL OBJECTIVE; HUMAN INTERACTIONS; HUMAN SCIENCE; INTERACTION ANALYSIS; SYNCHRONOUS INTERACTIONS; THEORETICAL APPROACH;

EXPERIMENTS;

DESIGN;

EID: 84862601239     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Bucciarelli L.L. Designing Engineers, 1996 (MIT Press, Cambridge).
2. Pahl G., Badke-Schaub P. and Frankenberger E. Résumé of 12 years inter disciplinary empirical studies of engineering design in Germany. Design Studies, 1999, 20(5), 481-494.
3. Cardella M.E., Atman C.J. and Adams R.S. Mapping between design activities and external representations for engineering student designers. Design Studies, 2002, 27(1), 5-24.
4. Parent A. Analysing design oriented dialogues: a case study in conceptual data modeling. Design Studies, 1997, 18(1), 43-66.
5. Fleming D. Design Talk: Constructing the Object in Studio Conversations. Design Issues, 1998, 14(2), 41-62.
6. Blessing L. and Chakrabarti A. DRM: A Design Research Methodology. In The International Conference on The Science of Design - The Scientific Challenge for the 21st Century, INSA, Lyon, France, March 2002.
7. Salomon G. Transcending the Qualitative-Quantitative Debate: The Analytic and Systemic Approaches to Educational Research. Educational Researcher, 1991, 20(6), 10-18.
8. Sacks H., Schlegloff E.A. and Jefferson G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 1974, 50(4), 696-735.
9. Pomerantz A. and Fehr B.J. Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense making practices. In Discourse as Social Interaction, 1997, 64-91. (Sage publications, London).
10. Jordan B. and Henderson A. Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1995, 4(1), 39-103.
11. Aviv R., Erlich Z., Ravid G. and Geva A. Network Analysis Of Knowledge Construction In Asynchronous Learning Networks. JALN, 2003, 7(3), 1-23.
12. Baker M.J., Quignard M., Lund K. and Séjourné A. Computer-supported collaborative learning in the space of debate. In The International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, Bergen, June 2003, pp.11-20. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht).
13. Bilmes J. Problems and resources in analyzing Northern Thai conversation for English language readers. Journal of Pragmatics, 1996, 26(22), 171-188.
14. Garfinkel H. and Sacks H. On Formal Structures of Practical Action. In Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Developments, 1970, pp.339 (Appleton-Centry-Crofts).
15. Linstead S. Ethnomethodology and sociology: an introduction. Sociological Review, 2006, 54(3), 399-404.
16. Coulon A. Ethnométhodologie [Ethnomethodology], 1987 (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris).
17. Hammersley M. Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: methods or paradigms? Discourse & Society, 2003, 14(6), 751-781.
18. Schegloff E.A. Naivete vs sophistication or discipline vs self-indulgence: a rejoinder to Billlig. Discourse & Society, 1999, 10(4), 577-582.
19. Kerbrat-Orecchioni C. La place de l'interprétation en analyse du discours en interaction" [The place of interpretation in the analysis of discourse in interaction]. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique, forthcoming.
20. Heritage J. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology, 1984 (Polity Press, Cambridge).
21. Schegloff E.A. Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society, 1997, 8(2), 165-187.
22. Arminen I. On the context sensitivity of institutional interaction. Discourse & Society, 2000, 11(4), 435-458.
23. Frolich D.M. (1993). Adding Interaction Analysis to the User Research Portfolio. In Rethinking theoretical frameworks for human computer interaction, InterCHI'93, Amsterdam, April 1993.
24. Koschmann, T. Revisiting the paradigms of instructional technology. In Meeting at the Crossroads, The 18th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Melbourne, 2001, pp.15-22 (The University of Melbourne, Melbourne).
25. Brown A.L. Design Experiments: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Creating Complex Interventions in Classroom Settings. The Journal Of The Learning Sciences, 1992, 2(2), 141-178.
26. Wiegers T. and Vergeest J.S.M. Extraction Of Cad Tool Requirements From Industry And From Experimental Design Projects. In Proceedings of 2001 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences And Computers and Information in Engineering Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, September 2001.
27. Collins A., Joseph D. and Bielaczyc K. Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. The Journal Of The Learning Sciences, 2004, 13(1), 15-42.
28. Baker M.J. and Lund K. Promoting reflective interactions in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 1997, 13(3), 175-193.
29. Sawyer R.K. and Berson S. Study group discourse: How external representations affect collaborative conversation. Linguistics and Education, 2004, 15(4), 387-412.
30. Baker M.J., Quignard M., Lund K. and Amelsvoort M. Designing a computer-supported collaborative learning situation for broadening and deepening understanding of the space of debate. In The Fifth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ISSA 2002, Amserdam, June 2002, pp.55-61 (Sic Sat Publications, Amsterdam).
31. Nicol D.J. and Boyle J.T. Peer Instruction versus Class-wide Discussion in Large Classes: a comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 2003, 28(4), 458-473.
32. Corbel A., Girardot J.J. and Jaillon P. DREW: A Dialogical Reasoning Web Tool. In The International Conference on ICT's in Education, ICTE 2002, Badajoz, 2002.
33. Roschelle J. and Teasley S.D. The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 1995 (Claire O'Malley) pp. 69-96.
34. Ahmed S. and Wallace K. M. Identifying and Supporting the Knowledge Needs of Novice Designers within the Aerospace Industry. Journal of Engineering Design, 2004, 15(6), 475-492.
35. Okudan, G.E. and Rao, G. (2005). Collaborative Conceptual Design Thinking and Software Aids: A Review. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Design Theory and Methodology Conference, IDETC/CIE 2005 ASME 2005, Long Beach, California, September 2005.