Collaborative conceptual design thinking and software aids: A review

Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference - DETC2005

Volumn 5, Issue , 2005, Pages 187-195

  Okudan, Gül E ^a   Rao, Girish ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SPECIFICATIONS;

COLLABORATIVE DESIGN; FOCI; SOFTWARE AIDS;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN;

EID: 33244486571     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/detc2005-84602     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (67)

1. Adams, S. and Okudan, G.E. (2003). A comprehensive model for student design team formation and performance in the engineering classroom. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Education ICEE'2003, July 21-25, 2003, Valencia, Spain.
2. Ahmed, S. and Wallace, K.M. (2004). Understanding the knowledge needs of novice designers in the aerospace industry. Design Studies, 25(2), 155-173.
3. Ahmed, S. Wallace, K.M. and Blessing, L.T.M. (2003). Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in Engineering Design, 14, 1-11.
4. Ahmed, S., Blessing, L.T.M., and K.M., Wallace (1999). The Relationships between data, information and knowledge based on a preliminary study of engineering designers. In Proceedings and ASME 12th International Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada.
5. Al-Salka, M. A., Cartmell, M. P. and Hardy, S. J. (1998). A framework for a generalized computer-based support environment for conceptual engineering design. Journal of Engineering Design, 9(1), 57-88.
6. Askin, R.G. and Sodhi, M. (1994). Organization of teams in concurrent engineering. In: Handbook of Design, Manufacturing, and Automation, R.D. Dorf and A. Kusiak (Eds.), John Wiley and Sons, New York, 85-105.
7. Badke-Schaub, P., J. Stempfle, and S. Wallmeier, 2000. Transfer of experience in critical design situations. Design Management: Process and Information Issues, edited by S. Cully, A. Duffy, C. McMohan, and K. Wallace. London: Professional Engineering Publishing, 251-258.
8. Badke-Schaub, P. and Frakenberger, E. (1999). Analysis of design projects. Design Studies, 20, 481-494.
9. Barak, M. and Goffer, N. (2002). Fostering systematic innovative thinking and problem solving: Lessons education can learn from industry. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12(3), 227-247.
10. Baya, V. (1996). Information Handling Behavior of Designers During Conceptual Design: Three Experiments. Unpublished PhD, Stanford University, Palo Alto.
11. Boujut, J., and Laureillard, P. (2002). A co-operation framework for product-process integration in engineering design. Design Studies, 23(5), 497-513.
12. Bray, R. M. Kerr, N.L. and Atkin, R.S. (1978). Effects of group size, problem difficulty, and sex on group performance, and member reactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1224-1240.
13. Bucciarelli, L.L. (1984). Reflective practice in engineering design. Design Studies, 5, 3.
14. Bucciarelli, L.L. (2002). Between thought and object in engineering design. Design Studies, 23, 219-231.
15. Chan, D. S. K. and Lewis, W. P. (2000). The Integration of Manufacturing and Cost Information into the Engineering Design Process. International Journal of Production Research, 38(17), 4413-4427.
16. Chen, J. Q. and Lee, S. (2003). An exploratory cognitive DSS for strategic decision making. Decision Support Systems, 36(2), 147-160.
17. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271-315.
18. Cohen, S. G. and Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
19. Coovert, M.D., Salas, E. and Craiger, J.P. (1990). Understanding team performance measures: Application of Petri Nets. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, IEEE, New York, 214-217.
20. Coovert, M.D., Campbell, G.E., Dorsey, D., Rametta, L., and Craiger, J.P. (1992). Quantifying team decision-making through the use of Petri nets. (Voll, Technical report). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Department of Psychology and Institute for Human Performance Decision Making and Cybernetics.
21. Coovert, M.D. and Dorsey, D.W. (2002). Computational modeling with Petri nets: Solutions for individual and team Systems. In Computational Modeling of Behaviors in Organizations. Eds. D.R. Ilgen and C.L. Hulin, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, ISBN 1-55798-639-8, 163-183.
22. Court, A. W., Culley, Culley, S. J., and McMahon, C. A. [djm6](1994). The importance of information transfer between the designer and the manufacturer. International Conference on Flexible Automation and Integrated Manufacturing, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
23. Cross, N. (1994). Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design, (second edition), John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
24. Devine, D.J. and Philips, J.L. (2001). Do smarter teams do better: A meta-analysis of cognitive ability and team performance. Small Group Research, 32 (5), 507-532.
25. Dorst, K. and Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies, 22, 5, 425-437.
26. Driskell, J.E., Hogan, R., Salas, E. (1987). Personality and group performance. Review of Personnel Psychology, 9, 91-113.
27. Ehrlenspiel, K. (1999). Practicians - How they are designing? . . . and Why? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED '99), 721-726.
28. Flint, D.J. (2002). Compressing new product success-to-success cycle time: Deep customer value understanding and idea generation. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 305-315.
29. Gabora, L. (2002, October 13-16). Cognitive mechanisms underlying the creative process. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Creativity and Cognition, Loughborough University, UK.
30. Groborz, M. and Necka, E. (2003). Creativity and cognitive control: Explorations of generation and evaluation skills. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2-3), 183-197.
31. Günther, J. and Ehrlenspiel, K. (1999). Comparing designers from practice and designers with systematic education. Design Studies, 20, 5, 439-452.
32. Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., and Florey, A. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep- level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 5, 1029-1045.
33. Hubka, V. (1982). Principles of Engineering Design, London: Butterworth Scientific.
34. Hubka, V. and Eder, W.E. (1992). Engineering Design in Heurista, Zurich.
35. Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multi-method examination of the benefits and detriments of intra-group conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282.
36. Kichuk, S. L. and Wiesner W. H. (1997). The big five personality factors and team performance: Implications for selecting successful product design teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14, 195-221.
37. Klein, M., Sayama, H., Faratin, P. and Bar-Yam, Y. (2003). The dynamics of collaborative design: Insights from complex systems and negotiations research. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 11(3), 201-209.
38. Kryssanov, V. V., Tamaki, H. and Kitamura, S. (2001). Understanding design fundamentals: How synthesis and analysis drive creativity, resulting in emergence. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 15(4), 329-342.
39. Lang, S. Y. T., Dickinson, J. and Buchal, R. O. (2002). Cognitive factors in distributed design. Computers in Industry, 48(1), 89-98.
40. Laeser, M., Moskal, B., Knecht, R. and Lasich, D. (2003). Engineering design: Examining the impact of gender and the team's gender composition. Journal of Engineering Education, 92, 1, 49-56.
41. Maffin, D. (1998). Engineering design models: Context, theory and practice. Journal of Engineering Design, 9(4), 315-327.
42. Maher, M. L. and H. H. Tang (2003). Co-evolution as a computational and cognitive model of design. Research in Engineering Design-Theory Applications and Concurrent Engineering, 14(1), 47-63.
43. Malhotra, A., Thomas, J. C., Carroll, J. M., and Miller, L. A. (1980). Cognitive processes in design. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 12, 119-140.
44. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
45. Morgan, B.B.,Jr. and Lassiter, D.L. (1992). Team composition and staffing. In: R.W. Swezey and E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their Training and Performance, Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ, 76-100.
46. Motte, D., Andersson, P.-E., and Bjarnemo, R. (2004). A study of the mechanical designer's strategies and tactics during the later phases of the engineering design process. Paper presented at the Design Theory and Methodology (DTM'04), Salt Lake City.
47. Noel, F. and Brissaud, D. (2003). Dynamic data sharing in a collaborative design environment. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 16(7-8), 546-556.
48. Okudan, G.E. (2002). On the gender orientation of the product design task. Proceedings of the 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, November 6-9, 2002, Boston, MA.
49. Okudan, G.E., Bilén, S., G. and Wu, X. (2003). Gender orientation of the design task: Product domain and familiarity issues. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design ICED, August 19-22, 2003, Stockholm, Sweden.
50. Pahl, G. and Beitz, W. (1995). Engineering Design, Springer: London.
51. Qiang, L., Y. F. Zhang and A. Y. C. Nee (2001). A distributive and collaborative concurrent product design system through the WWW/Internet. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 17, 315-322.
52. Rasmussen, J., Pejterson, A.M. and Goodstein, L.P. (1994). Cognitive Systems Engineering. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
53. Reif, F. and Scott, L. A. (1999). Teaching scientific thinking skills: Students and computers coaching each other. American Journal of Physics, 67(9), 819-831.
54. Reilly, R.R., Lynn, G.S., and Aronson, A.H. (2003). The role of personality in new product development team performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19, 2002, 39-58.
55. Roozenburg, N.F.M. and Dorst, K. (1998). Describing design as a reflective practice: Observations on Schön's theory of practice. In: E. Frankenberger, P. Badke-Schaub and H. Birkhofer (Eds.). Designers - The Key to Successful Product Development, Springer, London, 29-41.
56. Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, New York, Basic Books.
57. Sheetz, S. D. and Tegarden, D. P. (2001). Illustrating the cognitive consequences of object-oriented systems development. The Journal of Systems and Software, 59, 163-179.
58. Sim, S. K. and Duffy, A. H. B. (2003). Towards an ontology of generic engineering design activities. Research in Engineering Design, 14, 200-223.
59. Sim, S. K. and Duffy, A. H. B. (2004). Evolving a model of learning in design. Research in Engineering Design, 15(1), 40-61.
60. Stempfle, J. and Badke-Schaub, P. (2002). Thinking in design teams - An analysis of team communication. Design Studies, 23, 473-496.
61. Stauffer, L. A. and Ullman, D. G. (1991). Fundamental Processes of Mechanical Engineers Based on Empirical Data. Journal of Engineering Design, 2(2), 113-125.
62. Suwa, M., Purcell, T. and Gero, J. (1998). Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions. Design Studies, 19(4), 455-483.
63. Ullman, D. G. (2002). Toward the ideal mechanical engineering design support system. Research in Engineering Design, 13(2), 55-64.
64. Valkenburg, R. and Dorst, K. (1998). The reflective practice of design teams. Design Studies, 19(3), 249-271.
65. Vargas-Hernandez, N., & Shah, J. J. (2004). 2nd-CAD: A tool for conceptual systems design in electromechanical domain. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 4(1), 28-36.
66. Whitfield, R., Duffy, A. H., Coates, G. and Hills, W. (2002). Distributed design coordination. Research in Engineering Design, 13(4), 243-252.
67. Yen, S. J., Fruchter, R. and Leifer, L. J. (1999). Facilitating tacit knowledge capture and reuse in conceptual design activities. Paper presented at the ASME 12th International Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada.