MRI-guided and robotic-assisted prostate biopsy

Current Opinion in Urology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 316-319

  Fütterer, Jurgen J ^a   Barentsz, Jelle O ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

biopsy; MRI; MRI guided biopsy; prostate cancer; robotics

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; CANCER PATIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT CARE; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

ANIMALS; BIOPSY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, INTERVENTIONAL; MALE; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84862563594     PISSN: 09630643     EISSN: 14736586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328354833c     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012; 62:10-29.
2. DjaVan B, Ravery V, Zlotta A, et al. Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop? J Urol 2001; 166:1679-1683.
3. Sciarra A, Panebianco V, Ciccariello M, et al. Value of magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging for detecting prostate cancer foci in men with prior negative biopsy. Clin Cancer Res 2010; 16:1875-1883.
4. Hoeks CM, Schouten MG, Bomers JG, et al. Three-tesla magnetic resonanceguided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers. Eur Urol 2012. [Epub ahead of print]
5. Hambrock T, Somford DM, Hoeks C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen. J Urol 2010; 183:520-527.
6. Tanimoto A, Nakashima J, Kohno H, et al. Prostate cancer screening: the clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25:146-152.
7. Chen M, Dang HD, Wang JY, et al. Prostate cancer detection: comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and the three techniques combined. Acta Radiol 2008; 49:602-610.
8. Futterer JJ, Heijmink SW, Scheenen TW, et al. Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 2006; 241:449-458.
9. Langer DL, Van der Kwast TH, EVans AJ, et al. Prostate cancer detection with multiparametric MRI: logistic regression analysis of quantitative T2, diffusionweighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 30:327-334.
10. Hambrock T, Somford DM, Huisman HJ, et al. Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer. Radiology 2011; 259:453-461.
11. Mazaheri Y, Shukla-Dave A, Hricak H, et al. Prostate cancer: identification with combined diffusion-weighted MR imaging and 3D 1H MR spectroscopic imaging: correlation with pathologic findings. Radiology 2008; 246:480-488.
12. deSouza NM, Riches SF, Vanas NJ, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: A potential noninvasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer. Clin Radiol 2008; 63:774-782.
13. Hambrock T, Hoeks C, Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa C, et al. Prospective assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using 3-T diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies versus a systematic 10-core transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy cohort. Eur Urol 2012; 61:177-184.
14. Muntener M, Patriciu A, Petrisor D, et al. Transperineal prostate intervention: robot for fully automated MR imaging-system description and proof of principle in a canine model. Radiology 2008; 247:543-549.
15. Fischer GS, Iordachita I, Csoma C, et al. MRI-compatible pneumatic robot for transperineal prostate needle placement. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 2008; 13:295-305.
16. Van den Bosch MR, Moman MR, Van VM, et al. MRI-guided robotic system for transperineal prostate interventions: proof of principle. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55:N133-N140.
17. Zangos S, Melzer A, Eichler K. MR-compatible assistance system for biopsy in a high-field-strength system: initial results in patients with suspicious prostate lesions. Radiology 2011; 259:903-910.
18. Yakar D, Schouten MG, Bosboom DG, et al. Feasibility of a pneumatically actuated MR-compatible robot for transrectal prostate biopsy guidance. Radiology 2011; 260:241-247.
19. DiMaio SP, Pieper S, Chinzei K, et al. Robot-assisted needle placement in open MRI: system architecture, integration and validation. Comput Aided Surg 2007; 12:15-24.
20. Chinzei K, Miller K. Towards MRI guided surgical manipulator. Med Sci Monit 2001; 7:153-163.
21. Susil RC, Menard C, Krieger A, et al. Transrectal prostate biopsy and fiducial marker placement in a standard 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging scanner. J Urol 2006; 175:113-120.
22. Stoianovici D, Song D, Petrisor D, et al. MRI stealth robot for prostate interventions. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2007; 16:241-248.
23. Mozer PC, Partin AW, Stoianovici D. Robotic image-guided needle interventions of the prostate. Rev Urol 2009; 11:7-15.
24. Lagerburg V, Moerland MA, Konings MK, et al. Development of a tapping device: A new needle insertion method for prostate brachytherapy. Phys Med Biol 2006; 51:891-902.
25. Lagerburg V, Moerland MA, Van Vulpen M, Lagendijk JJ. A new robotic needle insertion method to minimise attendant prostate motion. Radiother Oncol 2006; 80:73-77.
26. Misra S, Reed KB, Schafer BW, et al. Mechanics of flexible needles robotically steered through soft tissue. Int J Rob Res 2010; 29:1640-1660.