Current status of transrectal ultrasound techniques in prostate cancer

Current Opinion in Urology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 297-302

  Smeenge, Martijn ^a   De La Rosette, Jean J M C H ^a   Wijkstra, Hessel ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Doppler; elastography; prostate cancer; quantification; TRUS

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

CANCER PATIENT; CANCER STAGING; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; ELASTOGRAPHY; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHEAR WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

BIOPSY; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEOPLASM GRADING; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 84862548705     PISSN: 09630643     EISSN: 14736586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283548154     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al. EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol 2011; 59:61-71.
2. Wolf AM, Wender RC, Etzioni RB, et al. American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010; 60:70-98.
3. Bueschen AJ, Lockhart ME. Evolution of urological imaging. Int J Urol 2011; 18:102-112.
4. Beemsterboer PM, Kranse R, de Koning HJ, et al. Changing role of 3 screening modalities in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (Rotterdam). Int J Cancer 1999; 84:437-441.
5. Engelbrecht MR, Barentsz JO, Jager GJ, et al. Prostate cancer staging using imaging. BJU Int 2000; 86 (Suppl 1):123-134.
6. Onur R, Littrup PJ, Pontes JE, Bianco FJ Jr. Contemporary impact of transrectal ultrasound lesions for prostate cancer detection. J Urol 2004; 172:512-514.
7. Sedelaar JP, Van Leenders GJ, Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA, et al. Microvessel density: correlation between contrast ultrasonography and histology of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2001; 40:285-293.
8. Mitterberger M, Pinggera GM, Pallwein L, et al. The value of three-dimensional transrectal ultrasonography in staging prostate cancer. BJU Int 2007; 100:47-50.
9. Beerlage HP, Aarnink RG, Ruijter ET, et al. Correlation of transrectal ultrasound, computer analysis of transrectal ultrasound and histopathology of radical prostatectomy specimen. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2001; 4:56-62.
10. Grabski B, Baeurle L, Loch A, et al. Computerized transrectal ultrasound of the prostate in a multicenter setup (C-TRUS-MS): detection of cancer after multiple negative systematic random and in primary biopsies. World J Urol 2011; 29:573-579.
11. Loch T. Computerized transrectal ultrasound (C-TRUS) of the prostate: detection of cancer in patients with multiple negative systematic random biopsies. World J Urol 2007; 25:375-380.
12. Braeckman J, Autier P, Soviany C, et al. The accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography supplemented with computer-aided ultrasonography for detecting small prostate cancers. BJU Int 2008; 102:1560-1565.
13. Simmons LA, Autier P, Zat'ura F, Braeckman J, Peltier A, Romic I et al. Detection, localisation and characterisation of prostate cancer by Prostate HistoScanning(). BJU Int 2011. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10734.x.
14. Abdollah F, Novara G, Briganti A, et al. Trans-rectal versus trans-perineal saturation rebiopsy of the prostate: is there a difference in cancer detection rate? Urology 2011; 77:921-925.
15. Philip J, Hanchanale V, Foster CS, Javle P. Importance of peripheral biopsies in maximising the detection of early prostate cancer in repeat 12-core biopsy protocols. BJU Int 2006; 98:559-562.
16. Erbersdobler A, Isbarn H, Dix K, et al. Prognostic value of microvessel density in prostate cancer: A tissue microarray study.World J Urol 2010; 28:687-692.
17. Fregene TA, Khanuja PS, Noto AC, et al. Tumor-associated angiogenesis in prostate cancer. Anticancer Res 1993; 13 (6B):2377-2381.
18. Takahashi S, Yamada Y, Homma Y, et al. Power Doppler ultrasonographydirected prostate biopsy in men with elevated serum PSA levels: an evaluation of the clinical utility and limitations. Urology 2002; 60:248-252.
19. Nelson ED, Slotoroff CB, Gomella LG, Halpern EJ. Targeted biopsy of the prostate: the impact of color Doppler imaging and elastography on prostate cancer detection and Gleason score. Urology 2007; 70:1136-1140.
20. Zhao HX, Zhu Q, Wang ZC. Detection of prostate cancer with threedimensional transrectal ultrasound: correlation with biopsy results. Br J Radiol 2011 (in press). doi: 10.1259/bjr/68418881
21. Morelli G, Pagni R, Mariani C, et al. Results of vardenafil mediated power Doppler ultrasound, contrast enhanced ultrasound and systematic random biopsies to detect prostate cancer. J Urol 2011; 185:2126-2131.
22. Kapoor A, Kapoor A, Mahajan G, Sidhu BS. Real-time elastography in the detection of prostate cancer in patients with raised PSA level. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011; 37:1374-1381.
23. Aigner F, Pallwein L, Junker D, et al. Value of real-time elastography targeted biopsy for prostate cancer detection in men with prostate specific antigen 1.25 ng/ml or greater and 4.00 ng/ml or less. J Urol 2010; 184:913-917.
24. Brock M, von BC, Sommerer F, et al. Comparison of real-time elastography with grey-scale ultrasonography for detection of organ-confined prostate cancer and extra capsular extension: A prospective analysis using whole mount sections after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2011; 108:E217-E222.
25. Zhai L, Polascik TJ, Foo WC, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of human prostates: initial in vivo demonstration. Ultrasound Med Biol 2012; 38:50-61.
26. Correas J, Khairoune A, Tissier A, et al. Trans-rectal quantitative shear wave elastrography: application to prostate cancer: A feasibility study. Poster ECR, Radiology congress 2011. doi: 10.1594/ecr2011/C-1748.
27. Pinto F, Totaro A, Calarco A, et al. Imaging in prostate cancer diagnosis: present role and future perspectives. Urol Int 2011; 86:373-382.
28. Hambrock T, Somford DM, Hoeks C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen. J Urol 2010; 183:520-527.
29. Pinto PA, Chung PH, Rastinehad AR, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging/ ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 2011; 186:1281-1285.
30. Hadaschik BA, Kuru TH, Tulea C, et al. A novel stereotactic prostate biopsy system integrating preinterventional magnetic resonance imaging and live ultrasound fusion. J Urol 2011; 186:2214-2220.
31. Kuenen MP, Mischi M, Wijkstra H, et al. Contrast-ultrasound diffusion imaging for localization of prostate cancer. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2011; 30:1493-1502.