Trans-rectal versus trans-perineal saturation rebiopsy of the prostate: Is there a difference in cancer detection rate?

Urology

Volumn 77, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 921-925

  Abdollah, Firas ^a   Novara, Giacomo ^a   Briganti, Alberto ^a   Scattoni, Vincenzo ^a   Raber, Marco ^a   Roscigno, Marco ^a   Suardi, Nazareno ^a   Gallina, Andrea ^a   Artibani, Walter ^a   Ficarra, Vincenzo ^a   Cestari, Andrea ^a   Guazzoni, Giorgio ^a   Rigatti, Patrizio ^a   Montorsi, Francesco ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERINEUM; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RECTUM;

EID: 79953903061     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.08.048     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Heidenreich A, Aus G, Bolla M, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2008;53:68-80. (Pubitemid 350166735)
2. Patel AR, Jones JS. Optimal biopsy strategies for the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2009;19:232-237.
3. Scattoni V, Raber M, Abdollah F, et al. Biopsy schemes with the fewest cores for detecting. 95 % of the prostate cancers detected by a 24-core biopsy. Eur Urol. 2009;57(1):1-8.
4. Scattoni V, Zlotta A, Montironi R, et al. Extended and saturation prostatic biopsy in the diagnosis and characterisation of prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol. 2007;52:1309-1322. (Pubitemid 47446019)
5. de La Taille A, Antiphon P, Salomon L, et al. Prospective evaluation of a 21-sample needle biopsy procedure designed to improve the prostate cancer detection rate. Urology. 2003;61:1181-1186. (Pubitemid 36693999)
6. Stewart CS, Leibovich BC, Weaver AL, et al. Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies. J Urol. 2001;166:86-91; [Discussion:91-92].
7. Walz J, Graefen M, Chun FK, et al. High incidence of prostate cancer detected by saturation biopsy after previous negative biopsy series. Eur Urol. 2006;50:498-505. (Pubitemid 44189057)
8. Scattoni V, Maccagnano C, Zanni G, et al. Is extended and saturation biopsy necessary? Int J Urol. 2010;17:432-447.
9. Emiliozzi P, Corsetti A, Tassi B, et al. Best approach for prostate cancer detection: a prospective study on transperineal versus transrectal six-core prostate biopsy. Urology. 2003;61:961-966. (Pubitemid 36547739)
10. Patel AR, Jones JS, Rabets J, et al. Parasagittal biopsies add minimal information in repeat saturation prostate biopsy. Urology. 2004;63:87-89. (Pubitemid 38147556)
11. Shinghal R, Terris MK. Limitations of transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies. Urology. 1999;54:706-708. (Pubitemid 29449434)
12. Hara R, Jo Y, Fujii T, et al. Optimal approach for prostate cancer detection as initial biopsy: prospective randomized study comparing transperineal versus transrectal systematic 12-core biopsy. Urology. 2008;71:191-195. (Pubitemid 351282351)
13. Takenaka A, Hara R, Ishimura T, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2008;11:134-138. (Pubitemid 351676600)
14. Djavan B, Mazal P, Zlotta A, et al. Pathological features of prostate cancer detected on initial and repeat prostate biopsy: results of the prospective European prostate cancer detection study. Prostate. 2001;47:111-117. (Pubitemid 32336580)
15. Djavan B, Ravery V, Zlotta A, et al. Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop? J Urol. 2001;166:1679-1683.
16. Raber M, Scattoni V, Roscigno M, Deho F, Briganti A, Salonia A, et al. Topical Prilocaine-lidocaine cream combined with peripheral nerve block improves pain control in prostatic biopsy: results from a prospective randomized trial. Eur Urol. 2008;53:967-973.
17. Novara G, Boscolo-Berto R, Lamon C, et al. Detection rate and factors predictive the presence of prostate cancer in patients undergoing ultrasonography-guided transperineal saturation biopsies of the prostate. BJU Int. 2009;105(9:1242-1246.
18. Austin PC. Some methods of propensity-score matching had superior performance to others: results of an empirical investigation and Monte Carlo simulations. Biomed J.. 2009;51:171-184.
19. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Am Stat Assoc. 1984:79;516-524.
20. Choi YJ, Kim JK, Kim HJ, et al. Interobserver variability of transrectal ultrasound for prostate volume measurement according to volume and observer experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:444-449.
21. Moran BJ, Braccioforte MH. Stereotactic transperineal prostate biopsy. Urology. 2009;73:386-388.