Evolution of urological imaging

International Journal of Urology

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 102-112

  Bueschen, Anton J ^a   Lockhart, Mark E ^b  

^a Division of Urology/Department of Surgery   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Renal; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ABDOMINAL RADIOTHERAPY; CHILD UROLOGY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CYSTOGRAPHY; DISEASE SURVEILLANCE; ECHOGRAPHY; EVOLUTION; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; IMAGING; INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY; KIDNEY ANGIOGRAPHY; KIDNEY TUMOR; LYMPHOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; REVIEW; UROLOGY; X RAY;

ANGIOGRAPHY; ANIMALS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EPIDIDYMIS; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SEMINAL VESICLES; UROGRAPHY; UROLOGY;

EID: 79251587161     PISSN: 09198172     EISSN: 14422042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02677.x     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Cunningham J, Friedland G. Early American uroradiology 1896-1933. Urol. Surv. 1972; 22: 226-8.
2. Marshall V. The controversial history of excretory urography. In: Witten DM, Myers GH, Utz DC, (eds). Emmett's Clinical Urography: An Atlas and Textbook of Roentgenologic Diagnosis. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1977; 2-5.
3. Braasch W. Pyelography. W B Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA, 1915.
4. Evans J, Monteith J, Dubilier W. Nephrotomography. Radiology 1955; 64: 655-63.
5. Bush W, Lasser E. Adverse reactions to intravascular iodinated contrast material. In: Pollack H, McClennan B (eds). Clinical Urography. W B Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, 2000; 43-60.
6. Belfield W. Vasostomy-radiography of the seminal duct. JAMA 1913; 61: 1867-9.
7. Boreau J, Elbim A, Hermann P, Vasselle B, Fua R. L'epididymographie. Presse Med. 1951; 59: 1406-7.
8. Dean A. Treatment of solitary cyst of the kidney by aspiration. Trans. Am. Assoc. Genitourin. Surg. 1939; 32: 91-5.
9. Farinas P. A new technique for the arteriographic examination of the abdominal aorta and its branches. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1941; 46: 641-5.
10. Seldinger S. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography. Acta Radiol. 1953; 39: 368-76.
11. Hutch J. Vesico-ureteral reflux in the paraplegic: cause and correction. J. Urol. 1952; 68: 457-67.
12. Schofner C. Cystourethrography: methodology, normal anatomy and pathology. J. Urol. 1970; 103: 92-103.
13. Conway J, King L, Belman A, Thorson T. Detection of vesicoureteral reflux with radionuclide cystography. Am. J. Roentgenol. Radium Ther. Nucl. Med. 1972; 115: 720-7.
14. Kinmouth J. Lymphangiography in man: a method of outlining lymphatic trunks at operation. Clin. Sci. 1952; 11: 13-20.
15. Kinmouth J, Taylor G, Harper R. Lymphangiography: a technique for its clinical use in the lower limb. Br. Med. J. 1955; 1: 940-2.
16. Taplin G, Meredith O Jr, Kade H, Winter C. The radioisotope renogram. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1956; 481: 886-901.
17. Datta N, Mishkin F. Radionuclide imaging in intrascrotal lesions. JAMA 1975; 231: 1060-2.
18. Hahn L, Nadel N, Gitter M, Vernon A. Testicular scanning: a new method for the preoperative diagnosis of testicular torsion. J. Urol. 1975; 113: 60-2.
19. Bueschen A, Witten D. Radionuclide evaluation of renal function. Urol. Clin. North Am. 1979; 6: 307-20.
20. Bueschen A, Joseph D. Radionuclide imaging of the urinary tract. World J. Urol. 1992; 10: 128-34.
21. Dubovsky E. Evaluation of renal transplants. In: Henkin RE, Bova D, Dillehay GL, Karesh SM, Halama JP, Wagner RH (eds). Nuclear Medicine. Mosby, St. Louis, MO, 1996; 1097-109.
22. Boubaker A, Prior J, Meuwly J, Bischof-Delaloye A. Radionuclide investigations of the urinary tract in the era of multimodality imaging. J. Nucl. Med. 2006; 47: 1819-36.
23. Abuzallouf S, Dayes I, Lukka H. Baseline staging of newly diagnosed prostate cancer: a summary of the literature. J. Urol. 2004; 171: 2122-7.
24. Wang G, Vannier M. Longitudinal resolution in volumetric x-ray computerized tomography - analytical comparison between conventional and helical computerized tomography. Med. Phys. 1994; 21: 429-33.
25. Manakas C, Nakada S. Computerized tomography: fundamentals of image acquisition and clinical usefulness. AUA Update Ser. 2009; 28: 113-19.
26. Schieven L, Smedts F, Hopman A, van der Wijk J, Nijman R, de Jong I. Fine needle aspiration using improved agar microbiopsy is highly concordant with renal mass final diagnosis and subclassification. J. Urol. 2009; 182: 2590-4.
27. Sourtzis S, Thibeau J, Damry N, Rasian A, Vandendris M, Bellemans M. Radiologic investigation of renal colic: unenhanced helical CT compared with excretory urography. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1999; 172: 1491-4.
28. Hinshaw W, Bottomley P, Holland G. Radiographic thin-section image of the human wrist by nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature 1977; 270: 722-3.
29. Campbell S, Novick A, Bukowski R. Renal tumors. In: Wein A (ed.). Campbell/Walsh Urology. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA, 2007; 1567-1637.
30. Cowper S, Robin H, Steinberg S etal. Scleromyxedema-like cutaneous diseases in renal-dialysis patients. Lancet 2000; 356: 1000-1.
31. Grobner T. Gadolinium, a specific trigger for the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosing dermopathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2006; 21: 1104-8.
32. Natalin R, Prince M, Grossman M, Silvers D, Landman J. Contemporary applications and limitations of magnetic resonance imaging contrast materials. J. Urol. 2010; 183: 27-33.
33. Silverman S, Leyendecker J, Amis JE. What is the current role of CT urography and MR urography in the evaluation of the urinary tract? Radiology 2009; 250: 309-23.
34. Takahashi N, Vrtiska TJ, Kawashima A etal. Detectability of urinary stones on virtual nonenhanced images generated at pyelographic-phase dual-energy CT. Radiology 2010; 256: 184-90.
35. Eliahou R, Hidas G, Duvdevani M, Sosna J. Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy computed tomography: an emerging application. Semin. Ultrasound CT MR 2010; 31: 315-20.
36. Heidenreich A, Albers P, Classen J etal. Imaging studies in metastatic urogenital cancer patients undergoing systemic therapy: recommendations of a multidisciplinary consensus meeting of the Association of Urological Oncology of the German Cancer Society. Urol. Int. 2010; 85: 1-10. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
37. Drieskens O, Oyen R, Van Poppel H, Vankan Y, Flamen P, Mortelmans L. FDG-PET for preoperative staging of bladder cancer. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2005; 32: 1412-17.
38. Kibel AS, Dehdashti F, Katz MD etal. Prospective study of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for staging of muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009; 27: 4314-20.
39. de Wit M, Brenner W, Hartmann M etal. [18F]-FDG-PET in clinical stage I/II non-seminomatous germ cell tumours: results of the German multicentre trial. Ann. Oncol. 2008; 19: 1619-23.
40. Spermon JR, De Geus-Oei LF, Kiemeney LA, Witjes JA, Oyen WJ. The role of (18)fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in initial staging and re-staging after chemotherapy for testicular germ cell tumours. BJU Int. 2002; 89: 549-56.
41. Lassen U, Daugaard G, Eigtved A, Højgaard L, Damgaard K, Rørth M. Whole-body FDG-PET in patients with stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumours. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2003; 30: 396-402.
42. Hain SF, O'Doherty MJ, Timothy AR, Leslie MD, Harper PG, Huddart RA. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of germ cell tumours at relapse. Br. J. Cancer 2000; 83: 863-9.
43. Kawamoto S, Montgomery RA, Lawler LP, Horton KM, Fishman EK. Multi-detector row CT evaluation of living renal donors prior to laparoscopic nephrectomy. Radiographics 2004; 24: 453-66.
44. Bjorkman H, Eklof H, Wadstrom J, Andersson LG, Nyman R, Magnusson A. Split renal function in patients with suspected renal artery stenosis: a comparison between gamma camera renography and two methods of measurement with computed tomography. Acta Radiol. 2006; 47: 107-13.
45. Nilsson H, Wadstrom J, Andersson LG, Raland H, Magnusson A. Measuring split renal function in renal donors: can computed tomography replace renography? Acta Radiol. 2004; 45: 474-80.
46. Summerlin AL, Lockhart ME, Strang AM, Kolettis PN, Fineberg NS, Smith JK. Determination of split renal function by 3D reconstruction of CT angiograms: a comparison with gamma camera renography. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008; 191: 1552-8.
47. Tublin ME, Bude RO, Platt JF. The resistive index in renal Doppler sonography: where do we stand? AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2003; 180: 885-92.
48. Turkbey B, Albert PS, Kurdziel K, Choyke PL. Imaging localized prostate cancer: current approaches and new developments. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2009; 192: 1471-80. Review.
49. Wilson SR, Greenbaum LD, Goldberg BB. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: what is the evidence and what are the obstacles? AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2009; 193: 55-60. Review.
50. Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J etal. The "Image Gently" campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program. Pediatr. Radiol. 2008; 38: 265-9. Epub 2008 Jan 17.