Computerized transrectal ultrasound of the prostate in a multicenter setup (C-TRUS-MS): Detection of cancer after multiple negative systematic random and in primary biopsies

World Journal of Urology

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 573-579

  Grabski, Bjoern ^a   Baeurle, Leif ^a   Loch, Annemie ^a   Wefer, Bjoern ^a   Paul, Udo ^a   Loch, Tillmann ^a  

^a Diakonissenkrankenhaus Flensburg   (Germany)

Author keywords

C TRUS; Computer analysis; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; INTERNET; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE; PROSTATE TUMOR;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 80053635200     PISSN: 07244983     EISSN: 14338726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-011-0713-0     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Potosky AL, Miller BA, Albertson PC, Kramer BS (1995) The role of increasing detection in the rising incidence of prostate cancer. JAMA 273: 548-552.
2. Cooner WH, Mosley BR, Rutherford C, Beard JH, Pond HS, Terry WJ, Igel TC, Kidd DD (1990) Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate speciWc antigen. J Urol 143: 1146-1154.
3. Oesterling JE (1991) Prostate speciWc antigen: a critical assessment of the most useful tumormarker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 145: 907-923.
4. Stamey TA, Yang N, Hay AR, McNeal JE, Freiha FS, Redwine E (1987) Prostate-speciWc antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. New Engl J Med 317: 909-916.
5. Jones JS, Oder M, Zippe CD (2002) Saturation biopsy with periprostatic block can be performed in oYce. J Urol 168: 2108-2110.
6. Fleshner N, Klotz L (2002) Role of "saturation biopsy" in the detection of prostate cancer among diYcult diagnostic cases. Urology 60: 93-97.
7. Chrouser KL, Lieber MM (2004) Extended and saturation needle biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep 5: 226-230.
8. Ashley RA, Inman BA, Routh JC, Mynderse LA, Gettman MT, Blute ML (2008) Reassessing the diagnostic yield of saturation biopsy of the prostate. Eur Urol 53(5): 976-983.
9. Simon J, Kuefer R, Bartsch G Jr, Volkmer BG, Hautmann RE, Gottfried HW (2008) Intensifying the saturation biopsy technique for detecting prostate cancer after previous negative biopsies: a step in the wrong direction. BJU Int 103(5): 701.
10. Lane BR, Zippe CD, Abouassaly R, Schoenfield L, Magi-Galluzzi C, Jones JS (2008) Saturation technique does not decrease cancer detection during followup after initial prostate biopsy. J Urol 179(5): 1746-1750.
11. Loch T et al (2007) Computerized transrectal ultrasound (C-TRUS) of the prostate: detection of cancer in patients with multiple negative systematic random biopsies. World J Urol 25: 375-380.
12. Loch T, Leuschner I, Genberg C, Weichert-Jacobsen K, Küppers F, Yfantis Y, Evans M, Tsarev V, Stöckle M (1999) ArtiWcial neural network analysis (ANNA) of prostatic transrectal ultrasound. Prostate 39: 198-204.
13. Loch T, Leuschner I, Genberg C, Weichert-Jacobsen K, Küppers F, Retz M, Lehmann J, Yfantis Y, Evans M, Tsarev V, Stöckle M (2000) Weiterentwicklung des transrektalen ultraschalls: artifzielle neuronale netzwerk-analyse (ANNA) in der erkennung und stadieneinteilung des prostatakarzinoms. Urologe A 39: 341-347.
14. Loch T, Lehmann J, Wullich B, Loch AC, Klein L, Scheliga A, Thomas M, Stöckle M (2004) Computerized transrectal ultrasound (C-TRUS) of the prostate: detection of cancer in patients with multiple negative systematic random biopsies. J Urol 171(4): 477A.
15. Gleason DF (1977) Histologic grading and staging of prostate carcinoma. In: Tannenbaum M (ed) Urologic pathology: the prostate. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 171-187.
16. Flanigan RC, Catalona WJ, Richie JP, Ahmann FR, Hudson MA, Scardino PT, DeKernion JB, RatliV TL, Kavoussi LR, Dalkin BL, Waters WB, MacFarlane MT, Southwick PC (1994) Accuracy of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in localizing prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6, 630 men. J Urol 152: 1506-1509.
17. Loch T, Bertermann H, Stöckle M (2000) Technische und anatomische Grundlagen des transrektalen Ultraschalls (TRUS) der Prostata. Urologe B 40: 475-483.
18. Beemsterboer PM, Kranse R, de Koning HJ, Habbema JD, Schröder FH (1999) Changing role of 3 screening modalities in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (Rotterdam). Int J Cancer 84: 437-441.
19. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA (1989) Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 142: 71-74.
20. Rome I (2004) The technique of ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. World J Urol 22: 353-356.
21. Shariat SF, Roehrborn Claus G (2008) Using biopsy to detect prostate cancer. Rev Urol Fall 10(4): 262-280.
22. National Comprehensive Cancer Network, authors (2007) Prostate cancer early detection. (Accessed November 1, 2007) http://www. nccn. org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/prostate_detection. pdf.
23. Cooner WH, Mosley BR, Rutherford C, Beard JH, Pond HS, Terry WJ, Igel TC, Kidd DD (1990) Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. J Urol 143: 1146-1154.
24. Levine MA, Ittman M, Melamed J, Lepor H (1998) Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 159: 471-475.
25. Naughton CK, Miller DC, Mager TDE, Ornstein DK, Catalona WJ, Lerner SP, Atkinson N (2000) A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy cores: impact on cancer detection. J Urol 164: 388-392.
26. Gore JL, Shariat SF, Miles BJ et al (2001) Optimal combinations of systematic sextant and laterally directed biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 165: 1554-1559.
27. Ravery V, Goldblatt L, Royer B et al (2000) Extensive biopsy protocol improves the detection rate of prostate cancer. J Urol 164: 393-396.
28. Presti JCJ, Chang JJ, Bhargava V et al (2000) The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. J Urol 163: 163-166.
29. de la Taille A, Antiphon P, Salomon L et al (2003) Prospective evaluation of a 21-sample needle biopsy procedure designed to improve the prostate cancer detection rate. Urology 61: 1181-1186.