Impact of cognitive absorption on facebook on students' achievement

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 296-303

  Rouis, Sana ^a  

^a LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; FRIEND; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERNET; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SATISFACTION; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL NETWORK; STUDENT; TUNISIA;

ACHIEVEMENT; BLOGGING; COGNITION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; FRIENDS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL NETWORKING; STUDENTS; TUNISIA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84862534282     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0390     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Usunier J-C, Valette-Florence P. The Time Styles Scale: a review of developments and replications over 15 years. Time Society 2007; 16:333-366.
2. Davies J, Graff MG. Performance in e-learning: online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology 2005; 36:657-663. (Pubitemid 43906782)
3. Anand V. A study of time management: the correlation between video game usage and academic performance markers. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2007; 10:552-559. (Pubitemid 47328669)
4. Canales C, Wilbanks B, Yeoman A. (2009) Does Facebook have negative impacts on academic performance? Facebook usage in relation to personality and academic performance. www.covenant.edu/news/09.28.09 (accessed June 6, 2011).
5. Karpinski AC, Duberstein A. A description of Facebook use and academic performance among undergraduate and graduate students. American Educational Research Association (AERA) Conference, San Diego, April 13-17, 2009.
6. Squire K. Video games and education. International Journal of Intelligent Games and Simulations 2003; 2:49-62.
7. Smyth JM. Beyond self-selection in video game play: an experimental examination of the consequences of massively multiplayer online role-playing game play. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2007; 10:717-721. (Pubitemid 47573877)
8. Young KS. Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 1998; 1:237-244. (Pubitemid 128540410)
9. Bransford JD, Schwartz DL. Rethinking transfer: a simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education 1999; 24:61-100.
10. Anderson CA, Dill KE. Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000; 78:772-790.
11. Hauge MR, Gentile DA. Video game addiction among adolescents: associations with academic performance and aggression. Presented at Society for Research in Child Development Conference, April 2003, Tampa, FL, p. 3. www.psychology. iastate.edu/*dgentile/SRCD%20Video%20Game% 20Addiction.pdf (accessed November 18, 2011).
12. Beck K, Bergen M, DeMarco R, et al. The use of a videogame for assessing sensory-motor and cognitive interference effects in humans. Proceedings of IEEE 29th Annual Bioengineering Conference, 2003, pp. 264-265.
13. Greenfield P, Brannon C, Lohr D. Two-dimensional representation of movement through three-dimensional space: the role of video game expertise. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 1994; 15:87-103.
14. Ip B, Jacobs G, Watkins A. Gaming frequency and academic performance. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 2008; 24:355-373.
15. Blumberg FC. Developmental differences at play: children's selective attention and performance video games. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 1998; 19:615-624. (Pubitemid 128178590)
16. Rosas R, Nussbaum M, Cumsille P, et al. Beyond Nintendo: design and assessment of educational video games for first and second grade students. Computers Education 2003; 40:71-94. (Pubitemid 35464297)
17. Hong J-C, Liu M-C. A study on thinking strategy between experts and novices of computer games. Computers in Human Behavior 2003; 19:245-258.
18. Kujath CL. Facebook and MySpace: complement or substitute for face-to-face interaction? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2011; 14:75-78.
19. Hsu C-W, Wang C-C, Tai Y-T. The closer the relationship, the more the interaction on Facebook? Investigating the case of Taiwan users. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2011; 14:473-476.
20. Jacobsen WC, Forste R. The wired generation: academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2011; 14:275-280.
21. Raacke J, Bonds-Raacke J. MySpace and Facebook: applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2008; 11:169-174. (Pubitemid 351555927)
22. Park N, Kee KF, Valenzuela S. Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2009; 12:729-733.
23. DeLeeuw KE, Mayer RE. A comparison of three measures of cognitive load: evidence for separable measures of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane load. Journal of Educational Psychology 2008; 100:223-234.
24. Paas F, Renkl A, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory and instructional design: recent developments. Educational Psychologist 2003; 38:1-4. (Pubitemid 36399998)
25. Paas F, Tuovinen JE, Tabbers H, et al. Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist 2003; 38:63-71. (Pubitemid 36400005)
26. Agarwal R, Karahanna E. Time flies when you're having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. Management Information System Quarterly 2000; 24:665-694.
27. Csikszentmihalyi M. (1990) Flow, the psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row Editions.
28. Lariscy RW, Avery EJ, Sweetser KD, et al. Research in brief: an examination of the role of online Facebook in journalists' source mix. Public Relations Review 2009; 35:314-316.
29. Eyrich N, Padman ML, Sweetser KD. PR practitioners' use of Facebook tools and communication technology. Public Relations Review 2008; 34:412-414.
30. Alexa Traffic Rank. (June 2010) Statistics summary for facebook.com www.alexa.com/siteinfo/facebook.com (accessed July 7, 2010).
31. Burton-Jones A, Straub DW. Reconceptualizing system usage: an approach and empirical test. Information System Research 2006; 17:228-322.
32. Venkatesh V, Brown SA, Maruping LM, et al. Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: the computing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation. Management Information System Quarterly (MISQ) 2008; 32:483-502.
33. Hecht TD, Allen NJ. Exploring links between polychronicity and well-being from the perspective of person-job fit: does it matter if you prefer to do only one thing at a time? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2005; 98:155-178. (Pubitemid 41600278)
34. Kaufman-Scarborough C, Lindquist JD. Time management and polychronicity. Comparisons, contrasts, and insights for the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology 1999; 14:288-312.
35. Lee H. Time and information technology: monochronicity, polychronicity and temporal symmetry. European Journal of Information Systems 1999; 8:16-26.
36. Lee W, Tan TMK, Hameed SS. Polychronicity, the Internet, and the mass media: a Singapore study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2006; 11:300-316.
37. Tajalli H, Opheim C. Strategies for closing the gap: predicting student performance in economically disadvantaged schools. Educational Research Quarterly 2005; 28:44-54. (Pubitemid 40899023)
38. Dahl S. Intercultural research: the current state of knowledge. Middlesex University Discussion Paper No. 26, January 12, 2004. http://ssrn.com/abstract = 658202 (accessed April 19, 2011).
39. Hall ET, Hall MR. (1990) Understanding cultural differences: Germans, French, and Americans. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
40. Chapman E. Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 2003; 8. http://PAREonline.net/ getvn.asp?v = 8 andn = 13 (accessed April 6, 2011).
41. Chow HPH. Life satisfaction among university students in a Canadian prairie city: a multivariate analysis. Social Indicators Research 2005; 70:139-150. (Pubitemid 41038486)
42. Gilman R, Huebner ES. Characteristics of adolescents who report very high life satisfaction. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 2006; 35:311-319.
43. Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen, RJ, et al. The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment 1985; 49:71-75. (Pubitemid 15080385)
44. Huebner ES, Laughlin JE, Ash C, et al. Further validation of the multidimensional students' life satisfaction scale. Journal of Psychological Assessment 1998; 16:118-134.
45. Kalpidou M, Costin D, Morris J. The relationship between Facebook and the well-being of undergraduate college students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2011; 14:183-189.
46. Kim U, Lee J-ER. The Facebook paths to happiness: effects of the number of Facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2011; 14:359-364.
47. Hair JF, Jr., Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. (2010) Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective, seventh edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
48. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research 1981; 18:382-388.
49. Cohen J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
50. Perspective du Monde. (2012) "Pyramide des ages." http://perspective.usherbrooke.ca/bilan/servlet/BMPagePyramide? codePays = TUN&annee = 2010 (accessed February 9, 2012).
51. CheckFacebook. (2012) Total users and% online population, Tunisia. www.checkfacebook.com/(accessed February 9, 2012).
52. Gosling SD, Augustine AA, Vazire S, et al. Manifestations of personality in online social networks: self-reported Facebook-related behaviors and observable profile information. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2011; 14:483-488.
53. Orr ES, Sisic M, Ross C, et al. The influence of shyness on the use of Facebook in an undergraduate sample. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2009; 12:337-340.
54. Wilson K, Fornasier S, White KM. Psychological predictors of young adults' use of social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2010; 13: 173-177.
55. Pelling EL, White KM. The theory of planned behavior applied to young people's use of social networking web sites. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2009; 12:755-759.
56. Barker V. Older adolescents' motivations for social network site use: the influence of gender, group identity, and collective self-esteem. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2009; 12: 209-213.
57. Zhang Y, Tang LS-T, Leung L. Gratifications, collective self-esteem, online emotional openness, and traitlike communication apprehension as predictors of Facebook uses. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2011; 14:733-739.
58. Teo TSH, Lim VKG, Lai RYC. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage. Omega, 1999; 27:25-37.
59. Appleton JJ, Christenson SL, Kim D, Reschly AL. Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 2006; 44:427-445. (Pubitemid 44340706)