Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates

Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation

Volumn 8, Issue 13, 2003, Pages

  Chapman, Elaine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957803780     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15317714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Aiken, L.R. (1997). Questionnaires and inventories: Surveying opinions and assessing personality. NY: John Wiley and Sons.
2. Assor, A., & Connell, J.P. (1992). The validity of students' self-reports as measures of performance-affecting self-appraisals. In D.H. Schunk & J.Meece (Eds.), Student Perceptions in the Classroom (pp. 25-46). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Bandura, A. (2001). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales (Revised). http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/effpage.html#effguide.
4. Bangert-Drowns, R.L. and Pyke, C. (2001). A taxonomy of student engagement with educational software: An exploration of literate thinking with electronic text. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24(3), 213-34.
5. Brophy, J. (1983). Conceptualizing student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 200-215.
6. Covington, M. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: an integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171-200.
7. Educational Testing Service (1992a). Attitudes toward school and school adjustment, preschool-grade 3: Annotated bibliography of tests. Eric Document No. 369810.
8. Educational Testing Service (1992b). Attitudes toward school and school adjustment, grades 4-6: Annotated bibliography of tests. Eric Document No. 369811.
9. Educational Testing Service (1992c). Attitudes toward school and school adjustment, grades 7 and above: Annotated bibliography of tests. Eric Document No. 369812.
10. Ellett, C.D., Chauvin, E. (1991). Development, validity, and reliability of a new generation of assessments of effective teaching and learning: Future directions for the study of learning environments. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 26(2), 25-36.
11. Fisher, C., Berliner, D., Filby, N., Marliave, R., Cahen, L., & Dishaw, M. (1980). Teaching behaviours, academic learning time, and student achievement: An overview. In C. Denham & A. Lieberman (Eds.), Time to Learn. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education.
12. Greenwood, C.R., & Delquadri, J. (1988). Code for Instructional Structure and Student Academic Response (CISSAR). In M.Hersen and A.S. Bellack (Eds.), Dictionary of Behavioural Assessment (pp. 120-122). NY: Pergamon.
13. Wigfield, A. (1997). Reading engagement: a rationale for theory and teaching. In J.T.Guthrie and A.Wigfield (Eds.), Reading Engagement: Motivating Readers Through Integrated Instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
14. Hart, D (1994). Authentic assessment: a handbook for educators. Menlo Park, Calif.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
15. Herman, K.C., & Tucker, C.M. (2000). Engagement in learning and academic success among at-risk Latino-American students. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 33(3), 129-36.
16. Kranzler, J., & H. Pajares, F. (1997). An exploratory factor analysis of the Mathematics Self-Efficacy Scale Revised (MSES-R). Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 29(4), 215-28.
17. Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K.A. (1992). Interest, learning, and development. In K.A. Renninger, S.Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 3-26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19. Marjoribanks, K. (1992). The predictive validity of an attitudes to school scale in relation to children's academic achievement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 945-949.
20. Marks, H.M. (2000). Student Engagement in Instructional Activity: Patterns in the Elementary, Middle, and High School Years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153-84.
21. Mathewson, G.C. (1994). Model of attitude influence upon reading and learning to read. In R.B. Ruddell & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd Edition, pp. 1131-1161). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
22. McGarity, J.R., & Butts, D.P. (1984). The relationship among teacher classroom management behavior, student engagement, and student achievement in middle and high school science students of varying aptitude. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(1), 55-61.
23. McIntyre, D.J., Copenhaver, R.W., Byrd, D.M., & Norris, W.R. (1983). A study of engaged student behaviour within classroom activities during mathematics class. Journal of Educational Research, 77(1), 55-59.
24. Meece, J.L., Blumenfield, P.C., & Hoyle, R.H. (1988). Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 514-523.
25. Miller, R.B., Greene, B.A., Montalvo, G.P., Ravindran, B., & Nichols, J.D. (1996). Engagement in academic work: The role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others, and perceived ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 388-422.
26. Natriello, G. (1984). Problems in the evaluation of students and student disengagement from secondary schools. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 17, 14-24.
27. Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1992). Instructional discourse and student engagement. In D.H. Schunk & J.Meece (Eds.), Student Perceptions in the Classroom (pp. 149-179). Hillsdale>, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Olson, J.M., & Zanna, M.P. (1993). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 117-54.
29. Osborne, J. (2000). Assessing metacognition in the classroom: the assessment of cognition monitoring effectiveness. Unpublished manuscript, The Department of Educational Psychology, University of Oklahoma.
30. Osborne, J. (2001). Assessing metacognition in the classroom: the assessment of cognition monitoring effectiveness. Unpublished manuscript, The Department of Educational Psychology, University of Oklahoma.
31. Pintrich, P.R., & De Groot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
32. Pintrich, P.R., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students' motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in clasroom academic tasks. In D.H. Schunk & J.Meece (Eds.), Student Perceptions in the Classroom (pp. 149-179). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A., Garcia, R., & McKeachie, W.J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.
34. Radford, D.L., Ramsey, L.L., & Deese, W.C. (1995). Demonstration assessment: Measuring conceptual undersanding and critical thinking with rubrics. The Science Teacher, 62(7), 52-55.
35. Royer, J.M., Cisero, C.A., & Carlo, M.S. (1993). Techniques and procedures for assessing cognitive skills. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 201-243.
36. Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 299-323.
37. Schraw, G., & Dennison, G. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.
38. Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman. B.J. (Eds.) (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates.
39. Skinner & Belmont (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behaviour and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-581.
40. Skinner, E.A., Wellborn, J.G., & Connell, J.P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: A process model of perceived control and children's engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 22-32.
41. Smith, M., Duda, J., Allen, J., & Hall, H. (2002). Contemporary measure of approach and avoidance goal orientations: Similarities and differences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 72, 155-190.
42. Stallings, J., Johnson, R., & Goodman, J. (1985). Engaged rates: Does grade level make a difference? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois, April, 1985. (Eric Document No. 267 018.)
43. Strickland, Bonnie R. (1989). Internal-External Control Expectancies: From Contingency to Creativity. American Psychologist, 44 (1), 1-12.
44. Sweet, A.P., Guthrie, J.T., & Ng, M. (1996). Teacher perceptions and students' motivation to read (Reading Research Report No. 69). Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center.
45. Thompson, M., Kaslow, N.J., Weiss, B., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1998). Children's attributional style questionnaire - revised: Psychometric examination. Psychological Assessment, 10(2), 166-170.
46. Tobias, S., Everson, H.T., & Laitusis, V. (1999). Towards a performance based measure of metacognitive knowledge monitoring: Relationships with self-reports and behavior ratings. Eric Document No. 432590.
47. Tobin, K. (1986). Validating teacher performance measures against student engagement and achievement in middle school science. Science Education, 70(5), 539-547.
48. Wang, M.C., & Walberg, H.J. (1983). Adaptive instruction and classroom time. American Educational Research Journal, 4, 601-626.
49. Ward, L., & Traweek, D. (1993). Application of a metacognitive strategy to assessment, intervention, and consultation: A think-aloud technique. Journal of School Psychology, 31, 469-485.
50. Waxman, H.C., & Huang, S.L. (1997). An observational study of technology integration in urban elementary and middle schools. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 25(1), 67-77.
51. Weinstein, C.E., & Palmer, D.R (1990). Learning and Study Strategies Inventory - High School Version. Florida: H & H Publishing Co.
52. Wolf, D., Bixby, J., Glenn, J., & Gardner, H. (1990). To use their minds well: Investigating new forms of student assessment. Review of Research in Education, 17, 31-74.
53. Ysseldyke, J., & Christenson, S. (1993). TIES-II: The Instructional Environment System-II. A system to identify a student's instructional needs. Eric Document No. 367072.
54. Zimmerman, B.J., & Pons, M.M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628.