The wired generation: Academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 275-280

  Jacobsen, Wade C ^a   Forste, Renata ^a  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; E-MAIL; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERNET; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

ACHIEVEMENT; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ELECTRONIC MAIL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 79959685477     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0135     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Kohut A, Parker K, Keeter S, et al. (2007) How young people view their lives, futures, and politics: A portrait of ''Generation Next.'' The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. http://people-press.org/report/ 300/a-portrait-ofgeneration- next (accessed Nov. 29, 2009).
2. Madden M, Jones S. (2002) The Internet goes to college. Pew Internet and American Life Project. www.pewinternet.org/ Reports/2002/The-Internet-Goes-to- College.aspx (accessed Oct. 5, 2009).
3. Salaway G, Caruso JB, Nelson MR, et al. (2008) The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2008. Volume 8. http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/ pdf/ERS0808/RS/ERS0808w.pdf (accessed Sept. 1, 2009).
4. Pool MM, van den Voort THA, Beentjes JWJ, et al. Background TV as an inhibitor of performance on easy and difficult homework assignments. Communication Research 2000; 27:293-326.
5. Kubey RW, Lavin MJ, Barrows JR. Internet use and collegiate academic performance decrements: Early findings. Journal of Communication 2001; 51:366-82.
6. Shin N. Exploring pathways from TV viewing to academic achievement in school age children. Journal of Genetic Psychology 2004; 165:367-81. (Pubitemid 40046077)
7. Anand V. Study of time management: The correlation between video game usage and academic performance markers. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2007; 10:552-9. (Pubitemid 47328669)
8. Fox AB, Rosen J, Crawford M. Distractions, distractions: does instant messaging affect college students' performance on a concurrent reading comprehension task? CyberPsychology & Behavior 2009; 12:51-3.
9. Boogart MR. Uncovering the social impacts of Facebook on a college campus. Master of Science Thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, 2006.
10. Levine LE, Waite BM, Bowman LL. Electronic media use, reading, and academic distractibility in college youth. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2007; 10:560-6. (Pubitemid 47328670)
11. Bowman LL, Levine LE, Waite BM, et al. Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading. Computers & Education 2010; 54:927-31.
12. Juster FT, Ono H, Stafford FP. An assessment of alternative methods of time use. Sociological Methodology 2003; 33: 19-54.
13. Van den Bulck J. Is TV bad for your health? Journal of Youth & Adolesence 2004; 29:273-88.
14. Heim J, Brandtzaeg PB, Kaare BH, et al. Children's usage of media technologies and psychosocial factors. New Media & Society 2007; 9:425-54.
15. Flowers L, Pascarella ET, Pierson CT. Information technology use and cognitive outcomes in the first year of college. The Journal of Higher Education 2000; 71:637-67.
16. Bickham DS, Rich M. Is TV viewing associated with social isolation. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 2006; 160:387-92.
17. Kubey RW. TV use in everyday life: Coping with unstructured time. Journal of Communication 1986; 36:108-23.
18. Roberts DF, Foehr UG, Rideout V. (2005) Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18 year-olds. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.www.kff.org/entmedia/ loader.cfm?url=/ commonspot/security/getfile.cfm&PageID=51809 (accessed Sept. 23, 2009).
19. Roberts DF, Foehr UG. Trends in media use. The Future of Children 2008; 18:11-37. (Pubitemid 351679930)
20. Gross EF. Adolescent Internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Applied Developmental Psychology 2004; 25:633-49. (Pubitemid 40012012)
21. Stinebrickner R, Stinebrickner TR. Working during school and academic performance. Journal of Labor Economics 2003; 21:473-91.
22. Betts JR, Morell D. The determinants of undergraduate GPA: The relative importance of family background, high school resources, and peer group effects. The Journal of Human Resources 1999; 34:268-93. (Pubitemid 29353356)
23. Young JW. Gender bias in predicting college academic performance: A new approach using item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement 1991; 28:37-47.
24. Zwick R, Sklar JG. Predicting college grades and degree completion using high school grades and SAT scores: The role of student ethnicity and first language. American Educational Research Journal 2005; 42:439-64. (Pubitemid 41498207)
25. Ditchkoff SS, Laband DN, Hanby K. Academic performance of transfer versus native students in a wildlife bachelor of science program. Wildlife Society Bulletin 2003; 31:1021-6. (Pubitemid 38127004)
26. Kraut R, Kiesler S, Boneva B, et al. Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues 2002; 58:49-74. (Pubitemid 34268218)
27. Bargh JA, McKenna KYA. The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology 2004; 55:573-90.
28. Rainie L. (2000) Tracking online life: How women use the Internet to cultivate relationships with family and friends. Pew Internet and American Life Project. www.pewinternet org/Press-Releases/2000/Tracking-online-life-How- womenuse- the-Internet-to-cultivate-relationships-with-family-andfriends. aspx (accessed Sept. 23, 2009).
29. Katz JE, Rice RE, Aspden P. The Internet 1995-2000.American Behavioral Scientist 2001; 45:405-19.
30. Bessière K, Kiesler S, Kraut R, et al. Effects of Internet use and social resources on changes in depression. Information, Communication, & Society 2008; 11:47-70.
31. Valkenburg PM, Peter J. Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 2007; 12:1169-82.
32. Padilla-Walker LM, Nelson LJ, Carroll JS, et al. More than just a game: Video game and Internet use during emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 2009; 39: 103-13.
33. Ducheneaut N, Moore RJ, Oehlberg L, et al. Social TV: Designing for distributed sociable television viewing. International Journal of Computer-Human Interaction 2008; 24:136-54.
34. Inderbitzen-Nolan HM, Walters KS. Social anxiety scale for adolescents: Normative data and further evidence of construct validity. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 2000; 29:360-71.
35. Strage A. Predictors of college adjustment and success: Similarities and differences among Southeast-Asian-American, Hispanic and White students. Education 2000; 120:731-41.
36. Dornbusch SM, Ritter PD, Leiderman PH, et al. The relation of parenting style to adolescent school performance. Child Development 1987; 58:1244-57.
37. Royston P. Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata Journal 2004; 4:227-41.
38. Hoffmann JP. (2004) Generalized linear models an applied approach. Boston: Pearson Education.
39. Yaffee RA. (2002) Robust regression analysis: Some popular statistical package options. Statistics, Social Science, and Mapping Group, Academic Computing Services, Information Technology Services, New York University. www.nyu edu/its/statistics/Docs/RobustReg2.pdf (accessed Dec. 5, 2009).
40. Anderson C, Schumacker RE. A comparison of five robust regression methods with ordinary least squares regression: Relative efficiency, bias, and test of null hypothesis. Understanding Statistics 2003; 2:79-103.
41. Hannon LE. Extremely poor neighborhoods and homicide. Social Science Quarterly 2005; 86:1418-34. (Pubitemid 43082607)