A reduct derived from feature selection

Pattern Recognition Letters

Volumn 33, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1638-1646

  Deng, Tingquan ^a   Yang, Chengdong ^a,b   Wang, Xiaofei ^a  

^a HARBIN ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b LINYI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Attribute reduction; Data mining; Decision systems; Feature selection; Rough sets

Indexed keywords

ATTRIBUTE REDUCTION; DATA SETS; DECISION INFORMATION SYSTEM; DECISION SYSTEMS; OPTIMAL ALGORITHM; OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; ROUGH SET; UCI REPOSITORY;

ALGORITHMS; DATA MINING; FEATURE EXTRACTION; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION;

ROUGH SET THEORY;

EID: 84862338473     PISSN: 01678655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2012.03.028     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. A. Ahmad, and L. Dey A feature selection technique for classificatory analysis Pattern Recognition Lett. 26 1 2005 43 56
2. E. Amaldi, and V. Kann On the approximation of minimizing non zero variables or unsatisfied relations in linear systems Theor. Comput. Sci. 209 1-2 1998 237 260
3. O. Barzilay, and V.L. Brailovsky On domain knowledge and feature selection using a support vector machine Pattern Recognition Lett. 20 5 1999 475 484
4. M. Dash, and H. Liu Consistency-based search in feature selection Artif. Intell. 151 1-2 2003 155 176
5. J. Demsar Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets J. Mach. Learn. Res. 7 2006 1 30
6. T. Dietterich Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms Neural Comput. 10 1998 1895 1924
7. F. Dornaika, E. Lazkano, and B. Sierra Improving dynamic facial expression recognition with feature subset selection Pattern Recognition Lett. 32 5 2011 740 748
8. M. Gaag, T. Hoffman, and M. Remijsen The five-factor model of the positive and negative syndrome scale II: A ten-fold cross-validation of a revised model Schizophr. Res. 85 1-3 2006 280 287
9. I. Guyon, J. Weston, S. Barnhill, and V. Vapnik Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines Mach. Learn. 46 2002 389 422
10. Hall, M. 2000. Correlation-based feature selection for discrete and numeric class machine learning. In: Proceedings of 17th International Conference Machine Learning, pp. 359-366.
11. Q. Hu, D. Yu, J. Liu, and C. Wu Neighborhood rough set based heterogeneous feature subset selection Inform. Sci. 178 2007 3577 3594
12. Q. Hu, D. Yu, and Z. Xie Information-preserving hybrid data reduction based on fuzzy-rough techniques Pattern Recognition Lett. 27 2006 414 423
13. H. Liu, J. Sun, L. Liu, and H. Zhang Feature selection with dynamic mutual information Pattern Recognit. 2009 1330 1339
14. Modrzejewski, M. 1993. Feature selection using rough sets theory. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning, Vienna, Austria, pp. 213-226.
15. Newman, D.; Hettich, S.; Blake, C.; Merz, C. 1998. UCI repository of machine learning databases, University of California, Department of Information and Computer Science, Irvine, CA. .
16. Z. Pawlak Rough sets Internat. J. Comput. Inform. Sci. 11 5 1982 341 356
17. Z. Pawlak Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, Boston, London
18. H. Peng, F. Long, and C. Ding Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 27 8 2005 1226 1238
19. P. Pudil, J.N.N. Choakjarernwanit, and J. Kittler An analysis of the max-min approach to feature selection and ordering Pattern Recognition Lett. 14 11 1993 841 847
20. P. Ruvolo, I. Fasel, and J.R. Movellan A learning approach to hierarchical feature selection and aggregation for audio classification Pattern Recognition Lett. 31 12 2010 1535 1542
21. Y. Shapira, and I. Gath Feature selection for multiple binary classification problems Pattern Recognition Lett. 20 8 1999 823 832
22. M. Sikonja, and I. Kononenko Theoretical and empirical analysis of relieff and rrelieff Mach. Learn. 2003 53
23. A. Skowron, and C. Rauszer The discernibility matrices and functions in information systems R. Slowinski, Intelligent Decision Support Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory 1992 Kluwer Dordrecht
24. D. Slézak Approximate entropy reducts Fund. Inform. 53 2002 365 390
25. R.W. Swiniarski, and A. Skowron Rough set methods in feature selection and recognition Pattern Recognition Lett. 24 6 2003 833 849
26. M.A. Tahir, and J. Smith Creating diverse nearest-neighbour ensembles using simultaneous metaheuristic feature selection Pattern Recognition Lett. 31 11 2010 1470 1480
27. S. Wong, and W. Ziarko On optimal decision rules in decision tables Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. 33 1985 693 696
28. Xu, Z.; Huang, L.; Yang, B. 2009. Efficient attribute reduction algorithm based on skowron discernibility matrix. In: International Workshop on Intelligent Systems and Applications, pp. 1-4.
29. Y. Yao, and Y. Zhao Discernibility matrix simplification for constructing attribute reducts Inform. Sci. 179 2009 867 882
30. D.M. Young, P.L. Odell, and V.R. Marco Optimal linear feature selection for a general class of statistical pattern recognition models Pattern Recognition Lett. 3 3 1985 161 165
31. S. Yu, S.D. Backer, and P. Scheunders Genetic feature selection combined with composite fuzzy nearest neighbor classifiers for hyperspectral satellite imagery Pattern Recognition Lett. 23 1-3 2002 183 190
32. L. Yu, and H. Liu Efficient feature selection via analysis of relevance and redundancy J. Mach. Learn. Res. 5 2004 1205 1224
33. S.C. Yusta Different metaheuristic strategies to solve the feature selection problem Pattern Recognition Lett. 30 5 2009 525 534