Conflict adaptation is reflected by response interference

Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 457-467

  Liu, Peiduo ^a   Chen, Antao ^a   Li, Chang ^a   Li, Hong ^a   West, Robert ^b  

^a SOUTHWEST UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Department of Statistics Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence Iowa State University 2438 Osborn Dr Ames   (United States)

Author keywords

Conflict adaptation; Conflict monitoring; Response interference; Stimulus interference

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADAPTATION SYNDROME; ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; STROOP TEST; CONFLICT; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 84862271715     PISSN: 20445911     EISSN: 2044592X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2011.651080     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Akcay, C., & Hazeltine, E. (2007). Conflict monitoring and feature overlap: Two sources of sequential modulations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(4), 742-748.
2. Akcay, C., & Hazeltine, E. (2008). Conflict adaptation depends on task structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(4), 958-973.
3. Bailey, K., West, R., & Anderson, C. A. (2010).-Rfaut negative association between video game experience and proactive cognitive control. Psychophysiology, 47(1), 34-42.
4. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108(3), 624-652.
5. Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(12), 539-546.
6. Bugg, J. M. (2008). Opposing influences on conflictdriven adaptation in the Eriksen flanker task. Memory and Cognition, 36(7), 1217-1227.
7. Chen, A., Bailey, K., Tiernan, B. N., & West, R. (2011). Neural correlates of stimulus and response interference in a 2-1 mapping Stroop task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 80(2), 129-138.
8. Davelaar, E. J., & Stevens, J. (2009). Sequential dependencies in the Eriksen flanker task: A direct comparison of two competing accounts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(1), 121-126.
9. De Houwer, J. (2003). On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect. Memory and Cognition, 31(3), 353-359.
10. De Pisapia, N., & Braver, T. S. (2006). A model of dual control mechanisms through anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex interactions. Neurocomputing, 69(10-12), 1322-1326.
11. Egner, T. (2007). Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(4), 380-390.
12. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C.W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in nonsearch task nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics 16 143-149.
13. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(4), 480-506.
14. Herd, S. A., Banich, M. T., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2006). Neural mechanisms of cognitive control: An integrative model of Stroop task performance and fMRI data. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(1), 22-32.
15. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K. P. (2004).-Rfaut feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68(1), 1-17.
16. Kerns, J. G. (2006). Anterior cingulate and prefrontalcortex activity in an FMRI study of trial-to-trial adjustments on the Simon task. NeuroImage, 33(1), 399-405.
17. Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. R., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303(5660), 1023-1026.
18. Larson, M. J., Kaufman, D. A., & Perlstein, W. M. (2009). Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task. Neuropsychologia, 47(3), 663-670.
19. Liotti, M., Woldorff, M. G., et al. (2000). An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect. Neuropsychologia, 38(5), 701-711.
20. Mayr, U., & Awh, E. (2008). The elusive link between conflict and conflict adaptation. Psychological Research.
21. Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflictadaptation effects in the absence of executivecontrol. Nature Neuroscience, 6(5), 450-452.
22. Milham, M. P., Banich, M. T., Claus, E. D., & Cohen, N.J. (2003). Practice-related effects demonstrate complementary roles of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices in attentional control. Neuroimage, 18(2), 483-493.
23. Milham, M. P., Banich, M. T., Webb, A., Barad, V., Cohen, N. J., Wszalek, T., et al. (2001). The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict. Cognitive Brain Research, 12(3), 467-473.
24. Nieuwenhuis, S., Stins, J. F., Posthuma, D., Polderman, T. J., Boomsma, D. I., & de Geus, E. J. (2006). Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: Conflict adaptation or associative priming? Memory and Cognition, 34(6), 1260-1272.
25. Notebaert, W., Gevers, W., Verbruggen, F., & Liefooghe, B. (2006). Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of congruity effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13(1), 112-117.
26. Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2006). Stimulus conflict predicts conflict adaptation in a numerical flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13(6), 1078-1084.
27. O'Reilly, R.C., & Munakata, Y. (2000). Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience: Understandingthe mind by simulating the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Perlstein, W. M., Larson, M. J., Dotson, V. M., & Kelly, K. G. (2006). Temporal dissociation of components of cognitive control dysfunction in severe TBI: ERPs and the cued-Stroop task. Neuropsychologia, 44(2), 260-274.
29. Purmann, S., Badde, S., & Wendt, M. (2009). Adjustments to recent and frequent conflict reflect two distinguishable mechanisms. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(2), 350-355.
30. Ullsperger, M., Bylsma, L. M., & Botvinick, M. M. (2005). The conflict adaptation effect: It's not just priming. Cognitive, Affect, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(4), 467-472.
31. Van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S. (2002). The timing of action-monitoring processes in the anterior cingulated cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(4), 593-602.
32. Van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S. (2005). Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study. NeuroImage, 27(3), 497-504.
33. Verbruggen, F., Notebaert, W., Liefooghe, B., &Vandierendonck, A. (2006). Stimulus- and response- conflict-induced cognitive control in the flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13(2), 328-333.
34. Wendt, M., Heldmann, M., Munte, T. F., & Kluwe, R. H. (2007). Disentangling sequential effects of stimulus- and response-related conflict and stimulusresponse repetition using brain potentials. Journal ofCognitive Neuroscience, 19(7), 1104-1112.
35. West, R. (2003). Neural correlates of cognitive control and conflict detection in the Stroop and digitlocation tasks. Neuropsychologia, 41(8), 1122-1135.
36. West, R., & Alain, C. (2000). Effect of task context and f luctuations of attention on neural activity supporting performance of the Stroop task. Brain Research, 873, 102-111.
37. West, R., Jakubek, K., Wymbs, N., Perry, M., & Moore, K. (2005). Neural correlates of conflict processing. Experimental Brain Research, 167(1), 38-48.