Neural mechanisms of cognitive control: An integrative model of stroop task performance and fMRI data

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 22-32

  Herd, Seth A ^a   Banich, Marie T ^a   O'Reilly, Randall C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN REGION; COGNITION; COLOR; COMPETITION; DATA ANALYSIS; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; INFORMATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORY; ALGORITHM; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COLOR VISION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; READING;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COGNITION; COLOR PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; READING;

EID: 33645737060     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089892906775250012     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Banich, M., Milham, M., Jacobson, B., Webb, A., Wszalek, T., Cohen, N., & Kramer, A. (2001). Attentional selection and the processing of task-irrelevant information: Insights from fMRI examinations of the Stroop task. In C. M. Casanova & M. Ptito (Eds.), Progress in brain research: Vol. 134. Vision: From neurons to cognition. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
2. Banich, M. T., Milham, M. P., Atchley, R., Cohen, N. J., Webb, A., Wszalek, T., Kramer, A. F., Liang, Z. P., Barad, V., Gullett, D., Shah, C., & Brown, C. (2000a). Prefrontal regions play a predominant role in imposing an attentional "set": Evidence from fMRI. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 1-9.
3. Banich, M. T., Milham, M. P., Atchley, R., Cohen, N. J., Webb, A., Wszalek, T., Kramer, A. F., Liang, Z. P., Wright, A., Shenker, J., & Magin, R. (2000b). fMRI studies of Stroop tasks reveal unique roles of anterior and posterior brain systems in attentional selection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 988-1000.
4. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
5. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing model of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
6. Cohen, J. D., & Huston, T. A. (1994). Progress in the use of interactive models for understanding attention and performance. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 1-19). Cambridge: MIT Press.
7. Corbetta, M., Miezin, F. M., Dobmeyer, S., Shulman, G. L., & Petersen, S. E. (1991). Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: Functional anatomy by positron emission tomography. Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 2383-2402.
8. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193.
9. Duncan, J. (1996). Cooperating brain systems in selective perception and action. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance (pp. 85-105). Cambridge: MIT Press.
10. Duncan, J., Humphreys, G., & Ward, R. (1997). Competitive brain activity in visual attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7, 255.
11. Frank, M. J., Loughry, B., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2001). Interactions between the frontal cortex and basal ganglia in working memory: A computational model. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 1, 137-160.
12. Freedman, D. J., Riesenhuber, M., Poggio, T., & Miller, E. K. (2002). Visual categorization and the primate prefrontal cortex: Neurophysiology and behavior. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 929-941.
13. Gomez-Urquijo, S. M., Reblet, C., Bueno-Lopez, J., & Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, I. (2000). Gabaergic neurons in the rabbit visual cortex: Percentage, layer distribution and cortical projections. Brain Research, 862, 171-179.
14. Jessen, F., Erb, M., Klose, U., Lotze, M., Grodd, W., & Heun, R. (1999). Activation of human language processing regions after the presentation of random letter strings demonstrated within event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroscience Letters, 270, 13-16.
15. Kastner, S., & Ungerleider, L. (2000). Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 315-341.
16. Kelley, W. M., Miezen, F. M., McDermott, K. B., Buckner, R. L., Raichle, M. E., Cohen, N. J., Ollinger, J. M., Akbudak, E., Conturo, T. E., Synder, A. Z., & Petersen, S. E. (1998). Hemispheric specialization in human dorsal cortex and medial temporal lobe for verbal and nonverbal memory encoding. Neuron, 20, 927-936.
17. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
18. Milham, M., Banich, M., & Barad, V. (2003). Competition for priority in processing increases prefrontal cortex involvement in top-down control: An event-related fMRI study of the Stroop task. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 212-222.
19. Milham, M., Banich, M., Claus, E., & Cohen, N. (2003b). Practice-related effects demonstrate complementary roles of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices in attentional control. Neuroimage, 18, 483-493.
20. Milham, M. P., Erickson, K. I., Banich, M. T., Kramer, A., Webb, A., Wszalek, T., & Cohen, N. J. (2002). Attentional control in the aging brain: Insights from an fMRI study of the Stroop task. Brain Cognition, 49, 277-296.
21. Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167-202.
22. Miller, E. K., Erickson, C. A., & Desimone, R. (1996). Neural mechanisms of visual working memory in prefontal cortex of the macaque. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 5154.
23. Oja, E. (1982). A simplified neuron model as a principal component analyzer. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 15, 267-273.
24. O'Reilly, R. C. (1998). Six principles for biologically-based computational models of cortical cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 455-462.
25. O'Reilly, R. C. (2001). Generalization in interactive networks: The benefits of inhibitory competition and Hebbian learning. Neural Computation, 13, 1199-1242.
26. O'Reilly, R. C., & Frank, M. J. (in press). Making working memory work: A computational model of learning in the frontal cortex and basal ganglia. Neural Computation.
27. O'Reilly, R. C., & Munakata, Y. (2000). Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience: Understanding the mind by simulating the brain. Cambridge: MIT Press.
28. Passingham, D., & Sakai, K. (2004). The prefrontal cortex and working memory: Physiology and brain imaging. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 163-168.
29. Price, C. J. (1998). The functional anatomy of word comprehension and production. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2, 281-288.
30. Rougier, N. P., Noelle, D., Braver, T. S., Cohen, J. D., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2005). Prefrontal cortex and the flexibility of cognitive control: Rules without symbols. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 102, 7338-7343.
31. Rougier, N. P., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2002). Learning representations in a gated prefrontal cortex model of dynamic task switching. Cognitive Science, 26, 503-520.
32. Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1999). Neuroscience: Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science, 283, 1657.
33. White, E. L. (1989). Cortical circuits: Synaptic organization of the cerebral cortex, structure, function, and theory. Boston: Birkhäuser.
34. Zysset, S., Muller, K., Lohmannn, G., & von-Cramon, D. Y. (2001). Color-word matching Stroop task: Separating interference and response conflict. Neuroimage, 13, 29-36.