On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 353-359

  De Houwer, Jan ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; COLLEGE STUDENT; COLOR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; REACTION TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; STROOP INTERFERENCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0037910404     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194393     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. BADDELEY, A. D., & HITCH, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-90). New York: Academic Press.
2. BOVENS, N., & BRYSBAERT, M. (1990). IBM PC/XT/AT and PS/2 Turbo Pascal timing with extended resolution. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 22, 332-334.
3. COHEN, J. D., DUNBAR, K., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
4. DALRYMPLE-ALFORD, E. C., & AZKOUL, J. (1972). The locus of interference in the Stroop and related tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 385-388.
5. DE HOUWER, J. (2003). A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 219-244). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. DE HOUWER, J. (in press). Spatial Simon effects with non-spatial responses. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
7. ERIKSEN, B. A.,& ERIKSEN, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
8. ERIKSEN, C. W. (1995). The flankers task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems. Visual Cognition, 2, 111-118.
9. GLASER, W. R., & GLASER, M. O. (1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13-42.
10. HOCK, H. S., & EGETH, H. (1970). Verbal interference with encoding in a perceptual classification task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 299-303.
11. KORNBLUM, S., HASBROUCQ, T., & OSMAN, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility. A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
12. LEVY, B. A. (1971). The role of articulation in auditory and visual shortterm memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 10, 123-132.
13. Lu, C.-H., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174-207.
14. MACLEOD, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
15. PROCTOR, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2002). Eliminating, magnifying, and reversing spatial compatibility effects with mixed location-relevant and irrelevant trials. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX(pp. 443-473). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. SIMON, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 3186). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
17. STROOP, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
18. TAGLIABUE, M., ZORZI, M., UMILTÀ, C., & BASSIGNANI, F. (2000). The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 648-670.
19. VIRZI, R. A., & EGETH, H. E. (1985). Toward a translational model of Stroop interference. Memory & Cognition, 13, 304-319.
20. ZHANG, H., & KORNBLUM, S. (1998). The effects of stimulus-response mapping and irrelevant stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus overlap in four-choice Stroop tasks with single-carrier stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 3-19.
21. ZHANG, H., ZHANG, J., & KORNBLUM, S. (1999). A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 386-432.