Xylose isomerase improves growth and ethanol production rates from biomass sugars for both Saccharomyces pastorianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 669-680

  Miller, Kristen P ^a,b   Gowtham, Yogender Kumar ^a   Henson, J Michael ^b   Harcum, Sarah W ^a  

^a AMRL   (United States)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethanol; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Saccharomyces pastorianus; Xylose; Xylose isomerase; Yeast

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE FEEDSTOCKS; BIOMASS SUGARS; CELL DENSITY CULTURE; CELLULOSIC BIOMASS; CELLULOSIC FEEDSTOCKS; ECONOMIC FEASIBILITIES; ETHANOL PRODUCTION; ETHANOL PRODUCTIVITY; GLUCOSE CONSUMPTION RATE; GLUCOSE ISOMERASE; PANICUM VIRGATUM; SACCHAROMYCES PASTORIANUS; SOLE CARBON; XYLOSE ISOMERASE; XYLULOSE;

BIOMASS; CELL CULTURE; ETHANOL; FEEDSTOCKS; FRUCTOSE; GLUCOSE; XYLOSE; YEAST;

ECOLOGY;

ALCOHOL; FRUCTOSE; ISOMERASE; PRIMER DNA; XYLOSE ISOMERASE;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; ENZYMOLOGY; FERMENTATION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; SACCHAROMYCES; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ALDOSE-KETOSE ISOMERASES; BASE SEQUENCE; BIOMASS; DNA PRIMERS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; FRUCTOSE; SACCHAROMYCES; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

PANICUM VIRGATUM; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES PASTORIANUS;

EID: 84862231911     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: 15206033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.1535     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alizadeh H, Teymouri F, Gilbert TI, Dale BE Pretreatment of switchgrass by ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX). Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2005; 121: 1133-1141.
2. Kumar D, Murthy GS Impact of pretreatment and downstream processing technologies on economics and energy in cellulosic ethanol production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2011; 4: 27-45.
3. Saerens SMG, Duong CT, Nevoigt E. Genetic improvement of brewer's yeast: current state, perspectives and limits. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010; 86: 1195-1212.
4. Nguyen HV, Gaillardin C. Two subgroups within the Saccharomyces bayanus species evidenced by PCR amplification and restriction polymorphism of the non-transcribed spacer 2 in the ribosomal DNA unit. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1997; 20: 286-294.
5. Naumov GI, Masneuf I, Naumova ES, Aigle M, Dubourdieu D. Association of Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum with some French wines: genetic analysis of yeast populations. Res Microbiol. 2000; 151: 683-691.
6. Querol A, Bond U. The complex and dynamic genomes of industrial yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009; 293: 1-10.
7. Quain DE. Brewing: New Technologies. Bamforth CW, editor. Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing Limited; 2006: 149-166.
8. Brown SW, Oliver SG. The effect of temperature on the ethanol tolerance of the yeast, Saccharomyces uvarum. Biotechnol Lett. 1982; 4: 269-274.
9. Pulvirenti A, Nguyen HV, Caggia C, Giudici P, Rainieri S, Zambonelli C. Saccharomyces uvarum, a proper species within Saccharomyces sensu stricto. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000; 192: 191-196.
10. Serra A, Strehaiano P, Taillandier P. Influence of temperature and pH on Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum growth: impact of a wine yeast interspecific hybridization on these parameters. Int J Food Microbiol. 2005; 104: 257-265.
11. Dunn B, Sherlock G. Reconstruction of the genome origins and evolution of the hybrid lager yeast Saccharomyces pastorianus. Genome Res. 2008; 18: 1610-1623.
12. Belloch C, Orlic S, Barrio E, Querol A. Fermentative stress adaptation of hybrids within the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008; 122: 188-195.
13. Blieck L, Toye G, Dumortier F, Verstrepen KJ, Delvaux FR, Thevelein JM, Van Dijck P. Isolation and characterization of brewer's yeast variants with improved fermentation performance under high-gravity conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007; 73: 815-824.
14. Goncalves P, de Sousa HR, Spencer-Martins I. FSY1, a novel gene encoding a specific fructose/H(+) symporter in the type strain of Saccharomyces carlsbergensis. J Bacteriol. 2000; 182: 5628-5630.
15. Guillaume C, Delobel P, Sablayrolles J-M, Blondin B. Molecular basis of fructose utilization by the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a mutated HXT3 allele enhances fructose fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007; 73: 2432-2439.
16. Chen YL. Development and application of co-culture for ethanol production by co-fermentation of glucose and xylose: a systematic review. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 38: 581-597.
17. van Maris AJA, Abbott DA, Bellissimi E, van den Brink J, Kuyper M, Luttik MAH, Wisselink HW, Scheffers WA, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Alcoholic fermentation of carbon sources in biomass hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: current status. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek Int J Gen Mol Microbiol 2006; 90: 391-418.
18. Chiang LC, Gong CS, Chen LF, Tsao GT. D-xylulose fermentation to ethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981; 42: 284-289.
19. Gong CS, Chen LF, Flickinger MC, Chiang LC, Tsao GT. Production of ethanol from D-xylose by using D-xylose isomerase and yeasts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981; 41: 430-436.
20. van Maris AJA, Winkler AA, Kuyper M, de Laat W, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. In: Biofuels Vol. 108. Olsson L, editor. Development of efficient xylose fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Xylose lsomerase as a key component. 2007; 179-204.
21. Ho NWY, Chen ZD, Brainard AP. Genetically engineered Sacccharomyces yeast capable of effective cofermentation of glucose and xylose. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998; 64: 1852-1859.
22. Brat D, Boles E, Wiedemann B. Functional expression of a bacterial xylose isomerase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009; 75: 2304-2311.
23. Bera AK, Ho NWY, Khan A, Sedlak M. A genetic overhaul of Saccharomyces cerevisiae 424A(LNH-ST) to improve xylose fermentation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 38: 617-626.
24. Runquist D, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Bettiga M. Increased ethanol productivity in xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae via a randomly mutagenized xylose reductase. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010; 76: 7796-7802.
25. Slininger PJ, Gorsich SW, Liu ZL. Culture nutrition and physiology impact the inhibitor tolerance of the yeast Pichia stipitis NRRL Y-7124. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009; 102: 778-790.
26. Ha SJ, Galazka JM, Kim SR, Choi JH, Yang XM, Seo JH, Glass NL, Cate JHD, Jin YS. Engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae capable of simultaneous cellobiose and xylose fermentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108: 504-509.
27. Kim Y, Hendrickson R, Mosier NS, Ladisch MR, Bals B, Balan V, Dale BE, Dien BS, Cotta MA. Effect of compositional variability of distillers' grains on cellulosic ethanol production. Bioresour Technol. 2010; 101: 5385-5393.
28. Madson PW, Monceaux DA. The Alcohol Textbook, 3rd ed. UK: Nottingham University Press; 1999; 257-268.
29. Yuan DW, Rao K, Relue P, Varanasi S. Fermentation of biomass sugars to ethanol using native industrial yeast strains. Bioresour Technol. 2011; 102: 3246-3253.
30. Rao K, Chelikani S, Relue P, Varanasi S. A novel technique that enables efficient conduct of simultaneous isomerization and fermentation (SIF) of xylose. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2008; 146: 101-117.
31. Ingledew WM. The Alcohol Textbook, 3rd Ed. UK: Nottingham University Press; 1999: 49-86.
32. Pereira GMD, Ramos CL, Galvao C, Dias ES, Schwan RF. Use of specific PCR primers to identify three important industrial species of Saccharomyces genus: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces bayanus and Saccharomyces pastorianus. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010; 51: 131-137.
33. Korz DJ, Rinas U, Hellmuth K, Sanders EA, Decker WD. Simple fed-batch technique for high cell density cultivation of Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol. 1995; 39: 59-65.
34. Sharma SS, Blattner FR, Harcum SW. Recombinant protein production in an Escherichia coli reduced genome strain. Metab Eng. 2007; 9: 133-141.
35. Naumov GI, Nguyen HV, Naumova ES, Michel A, Aigle M, Gaillardin C. Genetic identification of Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum, a cider-fermenting yeast. Int J Food Microbiol. 2001; 65: 163-171.
36. Miller KP. Biological Sciences, Vol. MS 62. Clemson, SC: Clemson University; 2010.
37. Slininger PJ, Dien BS, Gorsich SW, Liu ZL. Nitrogen source and mineral optimization enhance D-xylose conversion to ethanol by the yeast Pichia stipitis NRRL Y-7124. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006; 72: 1285-1296.
38. Ladisch MR, Svarczkopf JA. Ethanol production and the cost of fermentable sugars from biomass. Bioresour Technol. 1991; 36: 83-95.
39. Runquist D, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Bettiga M. Increasing ethanol productivity from xylose in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae by protein engineering. J Biotechnol. 2010; 150: S137-S137.
40. Hahn-Hagerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund F. Yeast optimization for fermenting C5 and C6 sugars. J Biotechnol. 2010; 150: S10-S10.
41. Weber C, Farwick A, Benisch F, Brat D, Dietz H, Subtil T, Boles E. Trends and challenges in the microbial production of lignocellulosic bioalcohol fuels. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010; 87: 1303-1315.
42. Jeffries TW. Engineering yeasts for xylose metabolism. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006; 17: 320-326.
43. Guo ZP, Zhang L, Ding ZY, Wang ZX, Shi GY. Improving ethanol productivity by modification of glycolytic redox factor generation in glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mutants of an industrial ethanol yeast. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 38: 935-943.
44. Almeida JRM, Bertilsson M, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Liden G, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. Carbon fluxes of xylose-consuming Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains are affected differently by NADH and NADPH usage in HMF reduction. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009; 84: 751-761.