Generalization of a parameter set selection procedure based on orthogonal projections and the D-optimality criterion

AIChE Journal

Volumn 58, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 2085-2096

  Chu, Yunfei ^a   Hahn, Juergen ^a  

^a Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Biochemical pathways; D optimality; Dynamic systems; Optimal experimental design; Orthogonal projection; Parameter estimation; Parameter selection

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMICAL PATHWAY; D-OPTIMALITY; OPTIMAL EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS; ORTHOGONAL PROJECTION; PARAMETER SELECTION;

DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

EID: 84862010046     PISSN: 00011541     EISSN: 15475905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aic.12727     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Yao KZ, Shaw BM, Kou B, McAuley KB, Bacon DW. Modeling ethylene/butene copolymerization with multi-site catalysts: parameter estimability and experimental design. Polym React Eng. 2003; 11: 563-588.
2. Lund BF, Foss BA. Parameter ranking by orthogonalization-applied to nonlinear mechanistic models. Automatica. 2008; 44: 278-281.
3. Brun R, Reichert P, Kunsch HR. Practical identifiability analysis of large environmental simulation models. Water Resour Res. 2001; 37: 1015-1030.
4. Omlin M, Brun R, Reichert P. Biogeochemical model of Lake Zurich: sensitivity, identifiability and uncertainty analysis. Ecol Model. 2001; 141: 105-123.
5. Turanyi T. Reduction of large reaction mechanisms. New J Chem. 1990; 14: 795-803.
6. Degenring D, Froemel C, Dikta G, Takors R. Sensitivity analysis for the reduction of complex metabolism models. J Process Control. 2004; 14: 729-745.
7. Schittkowski K. Experimental design tools for ordinary and algebraic differential equations. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2007; 46: 9137-9147.
8. Quaiser T, Monningmann M. Systematic identifiability testing for unambiguous mechanistic modeling-application to JAK-STAT, MAP kinase, and NF-kappa B signaling pathway models. BMC Syst Biol. 2009; 3: 50.
9. Sandink CA, McAuley KB, McLellan PJ. Selection of parameters for updating in on-line models. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2001; 40: 3936-3950.
10. Chu YF, Hahn J. Parameter set selection via clustering of parameters into pairwise indistinguishable groups of parameters. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2009; 48: 6000-6009.
11. Li RJ, Henson MA, Kurtz MJ. Selection of model parameters for off-line parameter estimation. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2004; 12: 402-412.
12. Sun CL, Hahn J. Parameter reduction for stable dynamical systems based on Hankel singular values and sensitivity analysis. Chem Eng Sci. 2006; 61: 5393-5403.
13. Walter E, Pronzato L. Qualitative and quantitative experiment design for phenomenological models-a survey. Automatica. 1990; 26: 195-213.
14. Weijers SR, Vanrolleghem PA. A procedure for selecting best identifiable parameters in calibrating activated sludge model no.1 to full-scale plant data. Water Sci Technol. 1997; 36: 69-79.
15. Brun R, Kuhni M, Siegrist H, Gujer W, Reichert P. Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters-systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets. Water Res. 2002; 36: 4113-4127.
16. Chu YF, Hahn J. Parameter set selection for estimation of nonlinear dynamic systems. AICHE J. 2007; 53: 2858-2870.
17. Machado VC, Tapia G, Gabriel D, Lafuente J, Baeza JA. Systematic identifiability study based on the Fisher Information Matrix for reducing the number of parameters calibration of an activated sludge model. Environ Modell Softw. 2009; 11: 1274-1284.
18. Rabitz H, Kramer M, Dacol D. Sensitivity analysis in chemical kinetics. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 1983; 34: 419-461.
19. Turanyi T. Sensitivity analysis of complex kinetic systems. Tools and applications. J Math Chem. 1990; 5: 203-248.
20. Caracotsios M, Stewart WE. Sensitivity analysis of initial value problems with mixed odes and algebraic equations. Comput Chem Eng. 1985; 9: 359-365.
21. Leis JR, Kramer MA. The simultaneous solution and sensitivity analysis of systems described by ordinary differential equations. ACM Trans Math Softw. 1988; 14: 45-60.
22. Chu YF, Hahn J. Integrating parameter selection with experimental design under uncertainty for nonlinear dynamic. AICHE J. 2008; 54: 2310-2320.
23. Burth M, Verghese GC, Velez-Reyes M. Subset selection for improved parameter estimation in on-line identification of a synchronous generator. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 1999; 14: 218-225.
24. Hiskens IA. Power system modeling for inverse problems. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I-Regul Pap. 2004; 51: 539-551.
25. Gadkar KG, Gunawan R, Doyle FJ. Iterative approach to model identification of biological networks. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005; 6: 155.
26. Kou B, McAuley KB, Hsu CC, Bacon DW, Yao KZ. Mathematical model and parameter estimation for gas-phase ethylene homopolymerization with supported metallocene catalyst. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2005; 44: 2428-2442.
27. Puskas JE, Chan SWP, McAuley KB, Shaikh S, Kaszas G. Kinetics and mechanisms in carbocationic polymerization: the quest for true rate constants. J Polym Sci Pol Chem. 2005; 43: 5394-5413.
28. Jaqaman K, Danuser G. Linking data to models: data regression. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006; 7: 813-819.
29. Yue H, Brown M, Knowles J, Wang H, Broomhead DS, Kell DB. Insights into the behaviour of systems biology models from dynamic sensitivty and identifiability analysis: a case study of an NF-kappa B signalling pathway. Mol Biosyst. 2006; 2: 640-649.
30. Lin WJ, Biegler LT, Jacobson AM. Modeling and optimization of a seeded suspension polymerization process. Chem Eng Sci. 2010; 65: 4350-4362.
31. Raue A, Kreutz C, Maiwald T, Klingmuller U, Timmer J. Addressing parameter identifiability by model-based experimentation. IET Syst Biol. 2011; 5: 120-130.
32. Velez-Reyes M, Verghese GC. Subset selection in identification, and application to speed and parameter estimation for induction machines. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE Conference on Control Applications, Albany, 1995: 991-997.
33. Hiskens IA. Nonlinear dynamic model evaluation from disturbance measurements. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2001; 16: 702-710.
34. Golub GH, van Loan CF. Matrix Computations, 3rd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
35. Franceschini G, Macchietto S. Model-based design of experiments for parameter precision: State of the art. Chem Eng Sci. 2008; 63: 4846-4872.
36. Kreutz C, Timmer J. Systems biology: experimental design. FEBS J. 2009; 276: 923-942.
37. Miao HY, Xia XH, Perelson AS, Wu HL. On identifiability of nonlinear ODE models and applications in viral dynamics. SIAM Rev. 2011; 53: 3-39.
38. Ashyraliyev M, Fomekong-Nanfack Y, Kaandorp JA, Blom JG. Systems biology: parameter estimation for biochemical models. FEBS J. 2009; 276: 886-902.
39. Gutenkunst RN, Waterfall JJ, Casey FP, Brown KS, Myers CR, Sethna JP. Universally sloppy parameter sensitivities in systems biology models. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007; 3: 1871-1878.
40. Singh A, Jayaraman A, Hahn J. Modeling regulatory mechanisms in IL-6 signal transduction in hepatocytes. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006; 95: 850-862.
41. Chu Y, Jayaraman A, Hahn J. Parameter sensitivity analysis of IL-6 signalling pathways. IET Syst Biol. 2007; 1: 342-352.
42. Seber GAF. A Matrix Handbook for Statisticians. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 2007.