Integrating parameter selection with experimental design under uncertainty for nonlinear dynamic systems

AIChE Journal

Volumn 54, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 2310-2320

  Chu, Yunfei ^a   Hahn, Juergen ^a  

^a Texas AandM University   (United States)

Author keywords

Experimental design; Parameter estimation; Parameter selection

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX PROCESSING; EXPERIMENT DESIGN; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FISHER INFORMATION; HYBRID METHODS; INITIAL STATES; INPUT SIGNALS; MIXED INTEGER NON-LINEAR PROGRAMMING; NON-LINEAR DYNAMIC SYSTEMS; PARAMETER SELECTION; PARAMETER VALUES; SENSITIVITY VALUES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION PATHWAYS; SIMULTANEOUS PERTURBATION STOCHASTIC APPROXIMATION; STIRRED-TANK REACTOR; UNIFIED FRAMEWORK;

APPROXIMATION ALGORITHMS; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; FISHER INFORMATION MATRIX; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; SCHRODINGER EQUATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

EID: 52649139002     PISSN: 00011541     EISSN: 15475905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aic.11562     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Walter E, Pronzato L. Identification of Parametric Models from Experimental Data. Berlin: Springer, 1997.
2. Ljung L. System Identification: Theory for the User, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall PTR, 1999.
3. Nelles O. Nonlinear System Identification: From Classical Approaches to Neural Networks and Fuzzy Models. Berlin: Springer, 2001.
4. Walter E, Pronzato L. Qualitative and quantitative experiment design for phenomenological models - a survey. Automatica. 1990;26:195-213.
5. Brun R, Reichert P, Kunsch HR. Practical identifiability analysis of large environmental simulation models. Water Resour Res. 2001;37: 1015-1030.
6. Velez-Reyes M, Verghese GC. Subset selection in identification, and application to speed and parameter estimation for induction machines. Proceedings of the 4th IEEE Conference on Control Applications. Albany, NY. 1995:991-997.
7. Sandink CA, McAuley KB, McLellan PJ. Selection of parameters for updating in on-line models. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2001;40:3936-3950.
8. Yao KZ, Shaw BM, Kou B, McAuley KB, Bacon DW. Modeling ethylene/butene copolymerization with multi-site catalysts: parameter estimability and experimental design. Polymer React Eng. 2003;11:563-588.
9. Li RJ, Henson MA, Kurtz MJ. Selection of model parameters for off-line parameter estimation. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Tech. 2004;12:402-412.
10. Weijers SR, Vanrolleghem PA. A procedure for selecting best identifiable parameters in calibrating activated sludge model no. 1 to full-scale plant data. Water Sci Tech. 1997;36:69-79.
11. Brun R, Kuhni M, Siegrist H, Gujer W, Reichert P. Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters - systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets. Water Res. 2002;36:4113-4127.
12. Reichert P, Vanrolleghem P. Identifiability and uncertainty analysis of the River Water Quality Model No. 1 (RWQM1). Water Sci Tech. 2001;43:329-338.
13. Chu Y, Hahn J. Parameter set selection for estimation for nonlinear dynamic systems. AIChE J. 2007;53:2858-2870.
14. Anh DT. Bonnet MP, Vachaud G, Minh CV, Prieur N, Duc LV. Anh LL. Biochemical modeling of the Nhue river (Hanoi, Vietnam): practical identifiability analysis and parameters estimation. Ecol Model. 2006;193:182-204.
15. Hiskens IA. Nonlinear dynamic model evaluation from disturbance measurements. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2001:16:702-710.
16. Bastogne T, Thomassin M, Masse J. Selection and identification of physical parameters from passive observation: application to a winding process. Contr Eng Pract. 2007;15:1051-1061.
17. Kou B, McAuley KB, Hsu CC, Bacon DW, Yao KZ. Mathematical model and parameter estimation for gas-phase ethylene homopolymerization with supported metallocene catalyst. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2005;44:2428-2442,
18. Gadkar KG, Varner J. Doyle FJ. Model identification of signal transduction networks from data using a state regulator problem. Syst Biol. 2005;2:17-30.
19. Kiefer J. Optimum experimental designs. J Roy Stat Soc B. 1959;21: 272-319.
20. Goodwin GC, Payne RL. Dynamic System Identification: Experiment Design and Data Analysis. New York: Academic Press, 1977.
21. Silvey SD. Optimal Design: An Introduction to the Theory for Parameter Estimation. London: Chapman and Hall, 1980,
22. Pukelsheim F. Optimal Design of Experiments. New York: Wiley, 1993.
23. Atkinson A, Doney A, Tobias R. Optimum Experimental Designs, with SAS. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
24. Asprey SP, Macchietto S. Designing robust optimal dynamic experiments. J Process Contr. 2002;12:545-556.
25. Korkel S, Kostina E, Bock HG, Sehloder JP. Numerical methods for optimal control problems in design of robust optimal experiments for nonlinear dynamic processes. Optim Meth Software. 2004;19:327-338.
26. Rojas CR, Welsh JS, Goodwin GC, Feuer A. Robust optimal experiment design for system identification. Automatica. 2007;43:993-1008.
27. Robbins H, Monro S. A stochastic approximation method. Ann Math Stat. 1951;22:400-407.
28. Kiefer J, Wolfowitz J. Stochastic estimation of the maximum of a regression function. Ann Math Stat. 1952;23:462-466.
29. Spall JC. Multivariate stochastic-approximation using a simultaneous perturbation gradient approximation. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 1992;37:332-341.
30. Spall JC. Implementation of the simultaneous perturbation algorithm for stochastic optimization. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst. 1998;34:817-823.
31. Spall JC. Introduction to Stochastic Search and Optimization: Estimation, Simulation, and Control. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience, 2003.
32. Goldberg DE. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1989.
33. Michalewicz Z, Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1994.
34. Goldberg DE, Richardson J. Genetic algorithms with sharing for multimodal function optimization. In: Grefenstette JJ, editor. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. Cambridge, MA, 1987:41-49.
35. Kraft D. On converting optimal control problems into nonlinear programming problems. Comput Math Model. 1985;15:261-280.
36. Vanderbei RJ, Shanno DF. An interior-point algorithm for nonconvex nonlinear programming more options. Comput Optim Appl. 1999;13:231-252.
37. Powell MJD. UOBYQA: unconstrained optimization by quadratic approximation. Math Program. 2002;92:555-582.
38. Gill PE, Murray W, Saunders MA. SNOPT: an SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization. SIAM J Optim. 2002;12:979-1006.
39. Wachter A, Biegler LT. On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Math Program. 2006;106:25-57.
40. Chin DC. Comparative study of stochastic algorithms for system optimization based on gradient approximations. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 1997;27:244-249.
41. Muske KR, Georgakis C. Optimal measurement system design for chemical processes. AIChE J. 2003;49:1488-1494.
42. Yamada S, Shiono S, Joo A, Yoshimura A. Control mechanism of JAK/ STAT signal transduction pathway. FEBS Lett. 2003;534:190-196.