Iterative approach to model identification of biological networks

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 6, Issue , 2005, Pages

  Gadkar, Kapil G ^a   Gunawan, Rudiyanto ^a   Doyle III, Francis J ^a  

^a University of California at Santa Barbara   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL NETWORKS; GENE REGULATION NETWORK; GENERAL APPLICATIONS; MODEL IDENTIFIABILITY; MODEL IDENTIFICATION; OPTIMAL EXPERIMENT DESIGN; OPTIMAL MEASUREMENTS; PARAMETER IDENTIFIABILITY;

ALGORITHMS; CELL DEATH; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; OPTIMIZATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ITERATIVE METHODS;

CASPASE; CASPASE 8; CASPASE 9;

ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PARAMETRIC TEST; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ALGORITHMS; APOPTOSIS; CASPASE 8; CASPASE 9; CASPASES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 25444510601     PISSN: 14712105     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-155     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Kitano H: Computational Systems Biology. Nature 2002, 420:206-210.
2. Ideker T, Thorsson V, Ranish JA, Christmas R, Buhler J, Eng JK, Bumgarner R, Goodlett DR, Aebersold R, Hood L: Integrated Genomic and Proteomic Analyses of a Systematically Perturbed Network. Science 2001, 292(5518):929-934.
3. Zhu H, Huang S, Dhar P: The Next Step in Systems Biology: Simulating the Temporospatial Dynamics of Molecular Networks. Bioessays 2003, 26:68-72.
4. Cho KH, Shin SY, Kolch W, Wolkenhauer O: Experimental Design in Systems Biology, Based on Parameter Sensitivity Analysis Using a Monte-Carlo Method: A Case Study for the TNF α-Mediated NF- κB Signal Transduction Pathway. Simulation 2003, 79:726-739.
5. Edwards JS, Ibarra RU, Palsson BO: In silico Predictions of Escherichia coli Metabolic Capabilities are Consistent with Experimental Data. Nat Biotechnol 2001, 19:125-130.
6. Schöberl B, Jonsson CE, Gilles ED, Müller G: Computational Modeling of the Dynamics of the MAP Kinase Cascade Activated by Surface and Internalized EGF Receptors. Nat Biotechnol 2002, 20:370-375.
7. Fussenegger M, Bailey JE, Varner J: A Mathematical Model of Caspase Function in Apoptosis. Nat Biotechnol 2000, 18:768-774.
8. Chen KC, Csikasz-Nagy A, Gyorffy B, Val J, Novak B, Tyson JJ: Kinetic Analysis of a Molecular Model of the Budding Yeast Cell Cycle. Mol Bio Cell 2000, 11:369-391.
9. Feng XJ, Rabitz H: Optimal identification of biochemical reaction networks. Biophys J 2004, 86(3):1270-1281.
10. Moles CG, Mendes P, Banga JR: Parameter Estimation in Biochemical Pathways: A Comparison of Global Optimization Methods. Genome Res 2003, 13:2467-2474.
11. Esposito WR, Floudas CA: Global Optimization for the Parameter Estimation of Differential-Algebraic Systems. Ind Eng Chem Res 2000, 39:1291-1310.
12. Grossmann IE: Global Optimization in Engineering Design Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996.
13. Papamichail I, Adjiman CS: A Rigorous Global Optimization Algorithm for Problems with Ordinary Differential Equations. J Global Optim 2002, 24:1-33.
14. Guss C, Boender E, Romeijn HE: Handbook of Global Optimization Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995 chap. Stochastic methods:829-869.
15. Ali MM, Storey C, Törn A: Application of Stochastic Global Optimization Algorithms to Practical Problems. J Optim Theory Appl 1997, 95:545-563.
16. Törn A, Ali MM, Viitanen S: Stochastic Global Optimzation: Problem Classes and Solution Techniques. J Global Optim 1999, 14:437-447.
17. Audoly S, Bellu G, D'Angio L, Saccomani MP, Cobelli C: Global Identifiability of Nonlinear Models of Biological Systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2001, 48:55-65.
18. Jacquez JA, Perry T: Parameter estimation: local identifiability of parameters. Amer J Physiol 1990, 258:E727-E736.
19. Yao KZ, Shaw BM, Kou B, McAuley KB, Bacon DW: Modeling Ethylene/Butene Copolymerization with Multi-Site Catalysts: Parameter Estimability and Experimental Design. Polymer Reaction Eng 2003, 11:563-588.
20. Landaw EM, DiStefano III JJ: Multiexponential, Multicompartmental, and Noncompartmental Modeling. II. Data Analysis and Statistical Considerations. Amer J Physiol 1984, 246:R665-R677.
21. Petersen B, Gernaey K, Vanrolleghem PA: Practical Identifiability of Model Parameters by Combined Respirometric-Titrimetric Measurements. Water Science Tech 2001, 43:347-355.
22. Zak DE, Gonye GE, Schwaber J, Doyle III FJ: Importance of Input Perturbations and Stochastic Gene Expression in the Reverse Engineering of Genetic Regulatory Networks: Insights from an Identifiability Analysis of an in Silico Network. Genome Res 2003, 13:2396-2405.
23. Asprey SP, Macchietto S: Statistical Tools for Optimal Dynamic Model Building. Comput Chem Eng 2000, 24:1261-1267.
24. Kremling A, Fischer S, Gadkar K, Doyle III FJ, Sauter T, Bullinger E, Allgower F, Gilles ED: A Benchmark for Methods in Reverse Engineering and Model Discrimination: Problem Formulation and Solutions. Genome Res 2004, 14:1773-1785.
25. Banga JR, Versyck KJ, Impe JFV: Computation of Optimal Identification Experiments for Nonlinear Dynamic Process Models: A Stochastic Global Optimization Approach. Ind Eng Chem Res 2002, 41:2425-2430.
26. Mahadevan R, Edwards JS, Doyle III FJ: Dynamic Flux Balance Analysis of Diauxic Growth in. E coli Biophys J 2002, 83:1331-1340.
27. Ljung L: System Identification: Theory for the User Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1999.
28. Ljung L, Guo L: The Role of Model Validation for Assessing the Size of the Unmodeled Dynamics. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 1997, 42:1230-1239.
29. Poolla K, Khargonekar P, Tikku A, Krause J, Nagpal K: A Time-Domain Approach to Model Validation. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 1994, 39:951-959.
30. Brogan WL: Modern Control Theory Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1991.
31. Vajda S, Rabitz H, Walter E, Lecourtier Y: Qualitative and Quantitative Indentifiability Analysis of Non-Linear Chemical Kinetic Models. Chem Eng Commun 1989, 83:191-219.
32. Emery AF, Nenarokomov AV: Optimal Experimental Design. Meas Sci Technol 1998, 9:864-876.
33. Beck JV, Arnold KJ: Parameter Estimation in Engineering and Science Toronto, Canada: John Wiley & Sons; 1977.
34. Gadkar KG, Gunawan R, Doyle III FJ: Heuristic Methods for Measurement Selection for Identification of Biological Systems. Int Conf Systems Biology, Heidelberg, Germany 2004.
35. Bastin G, Dochain D: On-Line Estimation and Adaptive Control of Bioreactors Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1990.
36. Albiol J, Robusté J, Casas C, Poch M: Biomass Estimation in Plant Cell Cultures Using Extended Kalman Filter. Biotechnol Prog 1993, 9:174-178.
37. Gee DA, Ramirez WF: On-Line State Estimation and Parameter Identification for Batch Fermentation. Biotechnol Prog 1996, 12:132-140.
38. Stephanopoulos G, San KY: Studies on on-Line Biorector Identification. I. Theory. Biotechnol Bioeng 1984, 26:1176-1188.
39. Glassey J, Ignova M, Ward AC, Montague GA, Morris AJ: Bioprocess Supervision: Neural Networks and Knowledge Based Systems. J Biotechnol 1997, 52:201-205.
40. Karim MN, Rivera SL: Comparision of Feed-Forward and Recurrent Neural Networks for Bioprocess State Estimation. Comp Chem Eng 1992, 16(Suppl):S369-S377.
41. Simutis R, Lübbert A: Exploratory Analysis of Bioprocesses Using Artificial Neural Network-Based Methods. Biotechnol Prog 1997, 13:479-487.
42. Gunawan R, Jung MYL, Seebauer EG, Braatz RD: Maximum a Posteriori Estimation of Transient Enhanced Diffusion Energetics. AIChE J 2003, 49:2114-2123.
43. Cover TM, Thomas JA: Elements of Information Theory John Wiley & Sons; 1991.
44. Gadkar KG, Varner J, Doyle III FJ: Model Identification of Signal Transduction Networks from Data Using a State Regulator Problem. IEE Systems Biology 2005, 2:.
45. 2 easy steps. Bioinformatics 2001, 17(12):1183-1197.
46. Gardner TS, Bernardo DD, Lorenz D, Collins JJ: Inferring genetic networks and identifying compound model of action via expression profiling. Science 2003, 301:102-105.
47. Basso K, Margolin AA, Stolovitzky G, Klein U, Dalla-Favera R, Califano A: Reverse engineering of regulatory networks in human B cells. Nat Genet 2005, 37(4382-390 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1532].
48. Chen BH, Asprey SP: On the Design of Optimally Informative Deynamic Experiments for Model Discrimination in Multiresponse Nonlinear Situations. Ind Eng Chem Res 2003, 42:1379-1390.
49. Frey AD, Kallio PT, Gadkar KG, Varner J: Dynamic Flux Balance Analysis of VHb Expression in Escherichia coli MG1655. Biotechnol Bioeng 2005. accepted
50. Taylor S, Gunawan R, Doyle III FJ: BioSens 2.0: Sensitivity Analysis Toolkit. 2005 [http://www.chemengr.ucsb.edu/~ceweb/faculty/doyle/biosens/BioSens.htm].