On-line plasticity in spoken sentence comprehension: Adapting to time-compressed speech

NeuroImage

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1124-1132

  Adank, Patti ^a,b,c   Devlin, Joseph T ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Auditory systems; Functional MRI; Learning; Prefrontal cortex; Temporal cortex

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY CORTEX; BEHAVIOR; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR SYSTEM; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NERVE POTENTIAL; NORMAL HUMAN; ONLINE ANALYSIS; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; VELOCITY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY CORTEX; CEREBRAL CORTEX; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LANGUAGE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CORTEX; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; OXYGEN; REACTION TIME; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70349974414     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.032     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Adank P., Evans B.G., Stuart-Smith J., and Scott S.K. Familiarity with a regional accent facilitates comprehension of that accent in noise. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 35 (2009) 520-529
2. Aydelott J., and Bates E. Effects of acoustic distortion and semantic context on lexical access. Lang. Cogn. Proc. 19 (2004) 29-56
3. Baddeley, A.D., Emslie, H., Nimmo-Smith, I., 1992. The Speed and Capacity of Language Processing (SCOLP) Test.
4. Bandettini P.A., Jesmanowicz A., van Kylen J., Birn R.M., and Hyde J.S. Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise. Magn. Reson. Med. 39 (1998) 410-416
5. Barbas H., and Pandya D.N. Architecture and frontal cortical connections of the premotor cortex (area 6) in the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 256 (1987) 211-228
6. Beckmann C.F., Jenkinson M., and Smith S.M. General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI. NeuroImage 20 (2003) 1052-1063
7. Benson R.R., Whalen D., Richardson M., Swainson B., Clark V.P., Lai S., and Liberman A.M. Parametrically dissociating speech and nonspeech in the brain using fMRI. Brain Lang. 78 (2001) 364-396
8. Binder J., Frost J., Hammeke T., Rao S., and Cox R. Function of the left planum temporale in auditory and linguistic processing. Brain 119 (1996) 1229-1247
9. Binder J.R., Frost J.A., Hammeke T.A., Bellgowan P.S., Springer J.A., Kaufman J.N., and Possing E.T. Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cereb. Cortex 10 (2000) 512-528
10. Blank S.C., Scott S.K., Murphy K., Warburton E., and Wise R.J. Speech production: Wernicke, Broca and beyond. Brain 125 (2002) 1829-1838
11. Boersma, P., Weenink, D., 2003. Praat: doing phonetics by computer.
12. Brown S., Ngan E., and Liotti M. A larynx area in the human motor cortex. Cereb. Cortex 18 (2007) 837-845
13. Callan D.E., Jones J.A., Callan A.M., and Akahane-Yamada R. Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory-auditory/or- osensory internal models. NeuroImage 22 (2004) 1182-1194
14. Clarke C.M., and Garrett M.F. Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116 (2004) 3647-3658
15. Crinion J.T., Lambon-Ralph M.A., Warburton E.A., Howard D., and Wise R.S.J. Temporal lobe regions engaged during normal speech comprehension. Brain 126 (2003) 1193-1201
16. D'Ausilio A., Pulvermuller F., Salmas P., Bufalari I., Begliomini C., and Fadiga L. Speech sounds like action: the somatotopy of speech processing in the motor system. Curr. Biol. 19 (2009) 381-385
17. Dale A.M. Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 8 (1999) 109-114
18. Davis M.H., and Johnsrude I.S. Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension. J. Neurosci. 23 (2003) 3423-3431
19. Dick F., Saygin A.P., Galati G., Pitzalis S., Bentrovato S., D'Amico S., Wilson S., Bates E., and Pizzamiglio L. What is involved and what is necessary for complex linguistic and nonlinguistic auditory processing: evidence from functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and lesion data. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19 (2007) 799-816
20. Diehl R.L., and Kluender K.R. On the objects of speech perception. Ecol. Psychol. 1 (1989) 121-144
21. Dupoux E., and Green K. Perceptual adjustment to highly compressed speech: effects of talker and rate changes. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 23 (1997) 914-927
22. Eden G.F., Joseph J.E., Brown H.E., Brown C.P., and Zeffiro T.A. Utilizing hemodynamic delay and dispersion to detect fMRI signal change without auditory interference: the behavior interleaved gradients technique. Magn. Reson. Med. 41 (1999) 13-20
23. Edmister W.B., Talavage T.M., Ledden T.J., and Weisskoff R.M. Improved auditory cortex imaging using clustered volume acquisitions. Hum. Brain Mapp. 7 (1999) 89-97
24. Fadiga L., Craighero L., Buccino G., and Rizzolatti G. Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 15 (2002) 399-402
25. Friston K.J., Worsley K.J., Frackowiak R.S.J., Mazziotta J.C., and Evans A.C. Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1 (1994) 214-220
26. Gaab N., Gabrieli J.D., and Glover G.H. Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28 (2006) 703-720
27. Galantucci B., Fowler C.A., and Turvey M.T. The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonom. Bull. Rev. 13 (2006) 361-377
28. Giraud A.L., Kell C., Thierfelder C., Sterzer P., Russ M.O., Preibisch C., and Kleinschmidt A. Contributions of sensory input auditory search and verbal comprehension to cortical activity during speech processing. Cereb. Cortex 14 (2004) 247-255
29. Glover G.H. Deconvolution of impulse response in event-related BOLD fMRI. NeuroImage 9 (1999) 416-429
30. Goldstone R.L. Perceptual learning. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 49 (1998) 585-612
31. Golomb J., Peelle J.E., and Wingfield A. Effects of stimulus variability and adult aging on adaptation to time-compressed speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121 (2007) 1701-1708
32. Greenspan S.L., Nusbaum H.C., and Pisoni D.P. Perceptual learning of synthetic speech produced by rule. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn., Mem., Cogn. 14 (1988) 421-433
33. Guenther F.H., Nieto-Castanon A., Ghosh S.S., and Tourville J.A. Representation of sound categories in auditory cortical maps. J. Speech, Lang., Hear. Res. 47 (2004) 46-57
34. Hall D.A., Haggard M.P., Akeroyd M.A., Palmer A.R., Summerfield A.Q., Elliot M.R., Gurney E.M., and Bowtell R.W. "Sparse" temporal sampling in auditory fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 7 (1999) 213-223
35. Hall D.A., Chambers J., Akeroyd M.A., Foster J.R., Coxon R., and Palmer A.R. Acoustic, psychophysical, and neuroimaging measurements of the effectiveness of active cancellation during auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125 (2009) 347-359
36. Hickok G., and Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8 (2007) 393-402
37. Hickok G., Love T., Swinney D., Wong E.C., and Buxton R.B. Functional MR imaging during auditory word perception: a single trial presentation paradigm. Brain Lang. 58 (1997) 197-201
38. Hoshi E., and Tanji J. Distinctions between dorsal and ventral premotor areas: anatomical connectivity and functional properties. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 17 (2007) 234-242
39. Ito T., Tiede M., and Ostry D.J. Somatosensory function in speech perception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106 (2009) 1245-1248
40. Jenkinson M., Bannister P., Brady M., and Smith S. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. NeuroImage 17 (2002) 825-841
41. Jenkinson M., and Smith S. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med. Image Anal. 5 (2001) 143-156
42. Leech R., Holt L.L., Devlin J.T., and Dick F. Expertise with non-speech sounds recruits speech-sensitive cortical regions. J. Neurosci. 29 (2009) 5234-52389
43. Liberman A.M., and Mattingly I.G. The motor theory of speech perception - revised. Cognition 21 (1985) 1-36
44. Liberman A.M., and Whalen D.H. On the relation of speech to language. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4 (2000) 187-196
45. Liberman A.M., Cooper F.S., Shankweiler D., and Studdert-Kennedy M. Perception of the speech code. Psychol. Rev. 74 (1967) 431-461
46. May J., Alcock K.J., Robinson L., and Mwita C. A computerized test of speed of language comprehension unconfounded by literacy. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 15 (2001) 433-443
47. McGurk H., and MacDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264 (1976) 746-748
48. Meister I.G., Wilson S.M., Deblieck C., Wu A.D., and Iacoboni M. The essential role of premotor cortex in speech perception. Curr. Biol. 17 (2007) 1692-1696
49. Meyer M., Steinhauer K., Alter K., Friederici A.D., and Von Cramon D.Y. Brain activity varies with modulation of dynamic pitch variance in sentence melody. Brain Lang. 89 (2004) 277-289
50. Moulines E., and Charpentier F. Pitch-synchronous waveform processing techniques for text-to-speech synthesis using diphones. Speech Commun. 9 (1990) 453-467
51. Murphy K., and Garavan H. Deriving the optimal number of events for an event-related fMRI study based on the spatial extent of activation. NeuroImage 27 (2005) 771-777
52. Nosofsky R.M. Attention, similarity, and the identification-specific relationship. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 115 (1986) 39-57
53. Okada K., and Hickok G. Left auditory cortex participates both in speech perception and speech production: neural overlap revealed by fMRI. Brain Lang. 98 (2006) 112-117
54. Pallier C., Sebastián-Gallés N., Dupoux E., Christophe A., and Mehler J. Perceptual adjustment to time-compressed speech: a cross-linguistic study. Mem. Cogn. 26 (1998) 844-851
55. Paulesu E., Frith C.D., and Frackowiak R.S. The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory. Nature 362 (1993) 342-345
56. Peelle J.E., McMillan C., Moore P., Grossman M., and Wingfield A. Dissociable patterns of brain activity during comprehension of rapid and syntactically complex speech: evidence from fMRI. Brain Lang. 91 (2004) 315-325
57. Poldrack R.A., Temple E., Protopapas A., Nagarajan S., Tallal P., Merzenich M., and Gabrieli J.D.E. Relations between the neural bases of dynamic auditory processing and phonological processing: evidence from fMRI. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13 (2001) 687-697
58. Price C., Thierry G., and Griffiths T. Speech-specific auditory processing: where is it?. Trends Cogn. Neurosci. 9 (2005) 271-276
59. Pulvermüller F., Huss M., Kherif F., Moscoso del Prado M., Hauk O., and Shtyrov Y. Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds. Proc. Am.Acad. Sci. 103 (2006) 7865-7870
60. Rauschecker A.M.M., Pringle A., and Watkins K.E.E. Changes in neural activity associated with learning to articulate novel auditory pseudowords by covert repetition. Hum. Brain Mapp. 29 (2008) 1231-1242
61. Rauschecker, A.M.M., Pringle, A., Watkins, K.E.E., in press. Changes in neural activity associated with learning to articulate novel auditory pseudowords by covert repetition. Human Brain Mapping.
62. Romero L., Walsh V., and Papagno C. The neural correlates of phonological short-term memory: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18 (2006) 1147-1155
63. Rosen S., Faulkner A., and Wilkinson L. Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106 (1999) 3629-3636
64. Rushworth M.F., Johansen-Berg H., Gobel S.M., and Devlin J.T. The left parietal and premotor cortices: motor attention and selection. NeuroImage 20 Suppl. 1 (2003) S89-S100
65. Schmidt C.F., Zaehle T., Meyer E., Geiser E., Boesiger P., and Jancke L. Silent and continuous fMRI scanning differentially modulate activation in an auditory language comprehension task. Hum. Brain Mapp. 29 (2008) 46-56
66. Schwarzbauer C., Davis M.H., Rodd J.M., and Johnsrude I. Interleaved silent steady state (ISSS) imaging: a new sparse imaging method applied to auditory fMRI. NeuroImage 29 (2006) 774-782
67. Scott S.K., and Wise R.J. The functional neuroanatomy of prelexical processing in speech perception. Cognition 92 (2004) 13-45
68. Scott S.K., Blank C.C., Rosen S., and Wise R.J. Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain 123 (2000) 2400-2406
69. Sebastián-Gallés N., Dupoux E., Costa A., and Mehler J. Adaptation to time-compressed speech: phonological determinants. Percept. Psychophys. 62 (2000) 834-842
70. Shah N.J., Jäncke L., Grosse-Ruyken M.L., and Muller-Gartner H.W. Influence of acoustic masking noise in fMRI of the auditory cortex during phonetic discrimination. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 9 (1999) 19-25
71. Shannon R.V., Zeng F.G., Kamath V., Wygonski J., and Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 270 (1995) 303-304
72. Skipper J., Nusbaum H.C., and Small S.L. Lending a helping hand to hearing: another motor theory of speech perception. In: Arbib M.A. (Ed). Action to Language via the Mirror Neuron System (2006), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: MA 250-285
73. Stevens K.N., and Klatt D.H. Role of formant transitions in the voiced-voiceless distinction for stops. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 55 (1974) 654-659
74. Talavage T.M., Edmister W.B., Ledden T.J., and Weisskoff R.M. Quantitative assessment of auditory cortex responses induced by imager acoustic noise. Hum. Brain Mapp. 7 (1999) 79-88
75. Tamer, G., Talavage, T., Wen-Ming, L., in press. Characterizing response to acoustic imaging noise for auditory event-related fMRI. IEEE Transactions in Biomedical Engineering.
76. Toni I., de Lange F.P., Noordzij M.L., and Hagoort P. Language beyond action. J. Physiol. - Paris 102 (2008) 71-79
77. Veltman D.J., Mechelli A., Friston K.J., and Price C.J. The importance of distributed sampling in blocked functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging designs. NeuroImage 17 (2002) 1203-1206
78. Watkins K.E., Strafella A.P., and Paus T. Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production. Neuropsychologia 41 (2003) 989-994
79. Watkins K.E., Vargha-Khadem F., Ashburner J., Passingham R.E., Connelly A., Friston K.J., Frackowiak R.S., Mishkin M., and Gadian D.G. MRI analysis of an inherited speech and language disorder: structural brain abnormalities. Brain 125 (2002) 465-478
80. Wilson S.M., Saygin A.P., Sereno M.I., and Iacoboni M. Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nat. Neurosci. 7 (2004) 701-702
81. Wingfield A., Peelle J.E., and Grossman M. Speech rate and syntactic complexity as multiplicative factors in speech comprehension by young and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychol. Cogn. 10 (2003) 310-322
82. Wise R.G., and Tracey I. The role of fMRI in drug discovery. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 23 (2006) 862-876
83. Wise R.J., Scott S.K., Blank S.C., Mummery C.J., Murphy K., and Warburton et.al. Separate neural subsystems within 'Wernicke's area'. Brain 124 (2001) 83-95
84. Wong D., Pisoni D.B., Learn J., Gandour J.T., Miyamoto R.T., and Hutchins G.D. PET imaging of differential cortical activation by monoaural speech and nonspeech stimuli. Hear. Res. 166 (2002) 9-23
85. Woolric h M.W., Ripley B.D., Brady M., and Smith S.M. Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data. NeuroImage 14 (2001) 1370-1386
86. Woolrich M.W., Jenkinson M., Brady J.M., and Smith S.M. Fully Bayesian spatio-temporal modeling of FMRI data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23 (2004) 213-231
87. Worsley K.J., Marrett S., Neelin P., Vandal A.C., Friston K.J., and Evans A.C. A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation. Hum. Brain Mapp. 4 (1996) 58-83
88. Zaehle T., Schmidt C.F., Meyer M., Baumann S., Baltes C., Boesiger P., and Jancke L. Comparison of "silent" clustered and sparse temporal fMRI acquisitions in tonal and speech perception tasks. NeuroImage 37 (2007) 1195-1204