Beyond superior temporal cortex: Intersubject correlations in narrative speech comprehension

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 230-242

  Wilson, Stephen M ^a,c   Molnar Szakacs, Istvan ^a,b   Iacoboni, Marco ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Default mode; Narrative speech comprehension

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; CINGULATE GYRUS; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH; TEMPORAL CORTEX;

ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 36849024459     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhm049     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Ahmad Z, Balsamo LM, Sachs BC, Xu B, Gaillard WD. 2003. Auditory comprehension of language in young children: neural networks identified with fMRI. Neurology 60:1598-1605.
2. Alho K, Vorobyev VA, Medvedev SV, Pakhomov SV, Starchenko MG, Tervaniemi M, Naatanen R. 2006. Selective attention to human voice enhances brain activity bilaterally in the superior temporal sulcus. Brain Res 1075:142-150.
3. Allison T, Puce A, McCarthy G. 2000. Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends Cogn Sci 4:267-278.
4. Binder JR, Frost JA, Hammeke TA, Bellgowan PS, Rao SM, Cox RW. 1999. Conceptual processing during the conscious resting state. A functional MRI study. J Cogn Neurosci 11:80-95.
5. Bookheimer S. 2002. Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annu Rev Neurosci 25:151-188.
6. Bush G, Luu P, Posner MI. 2000. Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 4:215-222.
7. Calvert GA, Campbell R, Brammer MJ. 2000. Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in human heteromodal cortex. Curr Biol 10:649-657.
8. Cox RW. 1996. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res 29:162-173.
9. Crinion JT, Lambon-Ralph MA, Warburton EA, Howard D, Wise RJ. 2003. Temporal lobe regions engaged during normal speech comprehension. Brain 126:1193-1201.
10. Crinion J, Price CJ. 2005. Right anterior superior temporal activation predicts auditory sentence comprehension following aphasic stroke. Brain 128:2858-2871.
11. Dehaene S, Dupoux E, Mehler J, Cohen L, Paulesu E, Perani D, van de Moortele PF, Lehericy S, Le Bihan D. 1997. Anatomical variability in the cortical representation of first and second language. Neuroreport 8:3809-3815.
12. Duvernoy HM. 1999. The human brain: surface, three-dimensional sectional anatomy with MRI, and blood supply. New York: Springer.
13. Engel SA, Rumelhart DE, Wandell BA, Lee AT, Glover GH, Chichilnisky EJ, Shadlen MN. 1994. fMRI of human visual cortex. Nature. 369:525.
14. Ferstl EC, von Cramon DY. 2002. What does the frontomedian cortex contribute to language processing: coherence or theory of mind? NeuroImage 17:1599-1612.
15. Fletcher PC, Happe F, Frith U, Baker SC, Dolan RJ, Frackowiak RS, Frith CD. 1995. Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of "theory of mind" in story comprehension. Cognition 57:109-128.
16. Frith CD, Frith U. 1999. Interacting minds - a biological basis. Science 286:1692-1695.
17. Gallagher HL, Happe F, Brunswick N, Fletcher PC, Frith U, Frith CD. 2000. Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of "theory of mind" in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia 38:11-21.
18. Giraud AL, Truy E, Frackowiak RS, Gregoire MC, Pujol JF, Collet L. 2000. Differential recruitment of the speech processing system in healthy subjects and rehabilitated cochlear implant patients. Brain 123:1391-1402.
19. Golland Y, Bentin S, Gelbard H, Benjamini Y, Heller R, Nir Y, Hasson U, Malach R. 2007. Extrinsic and intrinsic systems in the posterior cortex of the human brain revealed during natural sensory stimulation. Cereb Cortex 17:766-777.
20. Green E, Howes DH. 1978. The nature of conduction aphasia: a study of anatomic and clinical features and of underlying mechanisms. In: Whitaker A, Whitaker HA, editors. Studies in neurolinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press. p. 123-156.
21. Greicius MD, Menon V. 2004. Default-mode activity during a passive sensory task: uncoupled from deactivation but impacting activation. J Cogn Neurosci 16:1484-1492.
22. Gusnard DA, Raichle ME. 2001. Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:685-694.
23. Hasson U, Nir Y, Levy I, Fuhrmann G, Malach R. 2004. Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science 303:1634-1640.
24. Hickok G, Poeppel D. 2000. Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends Cogn Sci 4:131-138.
25. Hickok G, Poeppel D. 2004. Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition 92:67-99.
26. Holmes CJ, Hoge R, Collins L, Woods R, Toga AW, Evans AC. 1998. Enhancement of MR images using registration for signal averaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22:324-333.
27. Iacoboni M, Lieberman MD, Knowlton BJ, Molnar-Szakacs I, Moritz M, Throop CJ, Fiske AP. 2004. Watching social interactions produces dorsomedial prefrontal and medial parietal BOLD fMRI signal increases compared to a resting baseline. NeuroImage 21:1167-1173.
28. Iacoboni M, Molnar-Szakacs I, Gallese V, Buccino G, Mazziotta JC, Rizzolatti G. 2005. Grasping the intentions of others with one's own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biol. 3(3):e79.
29. Jung-Beeman M. 2005. Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends Cogn Sci 9:512-518.
30. Liebenthal E, Binder JR, Spitzer SM, Possing ET, Medler DA. 2005. Neural substrates of phonemic perception. Cereb Cortex 15:1621-1631.
31. Macaluso E, George N, Dolan R, Spence C, Driver J. 2004. Spatial and temporal factors during processing of audiovisual speech: a PET study. NeuroImage 21:725-732.
32. Maguire EA, Frith CD, Morris RG. 1999. The functional neuroanatomy of comprehension and memory: the importance of prior knowledge. Brain 122:1839-1850.
33. Mar RA. 2004. The neuropsychology of narrative: story comprehension, story production and their interrelation. Neuropsychologia 42:1414-1434.
34. Mazoyer BM, Tzourio N, Frak V, Syrota A, Murayama N, Levrier O, Salamon G, Dehaene S, Cohen L, Mehler J. 1993. The cortical representation of speech. J Cogn Neurosci 5:467-479.
35. Mazoyer B, Zago L, Mellet E, Bricogne S, Etard O, Houde O, Crivello F, Joliot M, Petit L, Tzourio-Mazoyer N. 2001. Cortical networks for working memory and executive functions sustain the conscious resting state in man. Brain Res Bull 54:287-298.
36. McKiernan KA, D'Angelo BR, Kaufman JN, Binder JR. 2006. Interrupting the "stream of consciousness": an fMRI investigation. NeuroImage 29:1185-1191.
37. McKiernan KA, Kaufman JN, Kucera-Thompson J, Binder JR. 2003. A parametric manipulation of factors affecting task-induced deactivation: an fMRI study. J Cogn Neurosci 15:394-408.
38. McNeill D. 1992. Hand and mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Molnar-Szakacs I, Iacoboni M, Koski L, Mazziotta JC. 2005. Functional segregation within pars opercularis of the inferior frontal gyrus: evidence from fMRI studies of imitation and action observation. Cereb Cortex 15:986-994.
40. Molnar-Szakacs I, Kaplan JT, Greenfield PM, Iacoboni M. 2006. Observing complex action sequences: the role of the fronto-parietal mirror neuron system. NeuroImage 33:923-935.
41. Papathanassiou D, Etard O, Mellet E, Zago L, Mazoyer B, Tzourio-Mazoyer N. 2000. A common language network for comprehension and production: a contribution to the definition of language epicenters with PET. NeuroImage 11:347-357.
42. Pelphrey KA, Morris JP, Michelich CR, Allison T, McCarthy G. 2005. Functional anatomy of biological motion perception in posterior temporal cortex: an FMRI study of eye, mouth and hand movements. Cereb Cortex 15:1866-1876.
43. Perani D, Paulesu E, Galles NS, Dupoux E, Dehaene S, Bettinardi V, Cappa SF, Fazio F, Mehler J. 1998. The bilingual brain. Proficiency and age of acquisition of the second language. Brain 121:1841-1852.
44. Pugh KR, Shaywitz BA, Shaywitz SE, Fulbright RK, Byrd D, Skudlarski P, Shankweiler DP, Katz L, Constable RT, Fletcher J, et al. 1996. Auditory selective attention: an fMRI investigation. NeuroImage 4:159-173.
45. Rademacher J, Morosan P, Schormann T, Schleicher A, Werner C, Freund HJ, Zilles K. 2001. Probabilistic mapping and volume measurement of human primary auditory cortex. NeuroImage 13:669-683.
46. Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, Powers WJ, Gusnard DA, Shulman GL. 2001. A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:676-682.
47. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. 2004. The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:169-192.
48. Robertson DA, Gernsbacher MA, Guidotti SJ, Robertson RR, Irwin W, Mock BJ, Campana ME. 2000. Functional neuroanatomy of the cognitive process of mapping during discourse comprehension. Psychol Sci 11:255-260.
49. Rodd JM, Davis MH, Johnsrude IS. 2005. The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity. Cereb Cortex 15:1261-1269.
50. Ross ED. 1981. The aprosodias. Functional-anatomic organization of the affective components of language in the right hemisphere. Arch Neurol 38:561-569.
51. Schmithorst VJ, Holland SK, Plante E. 2006. Cognitive modules utilized for narrative comprehension in children: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. NeuroImage 29:254-266.
52. Scott SK, Blank CC, Rosen S, Wise RJ. 2000. Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain 123:2400-2406.
53. Scott SK, Wise RJS. 2004. The functional neuroanatomy of prelexical processing in speech perception. Cognition 92:13-45.
54. Shmuel A, Yacoub E, Pfeuffer J, Van de Moortele PF, Adriany G, Hu X, Ugurbil K. 2002. Sustained negative BOLD, blood flow and oxygen consumption response and its coupling to the positive response in the human brain. Neuron 36:1195-1210.
55. Shulman GL, Fiez JA, Corbetta M, Buckner RL, Miezin FM, Raichle ME, Petersen SE. 1997. Common blood flow changes across visual tasks: II. Decreases in cerebral cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 9:648-663.
56. Skipper JI, Nusbaum HC, Small SL. 2005. Listening to talking faces: motor cortical activation during speech perception. NeuroImage 25:76-89.
57. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H, Bannister PR, De Luca M, Drobnjak I, Flitney DE, et al. 2004. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage 23:S208-S219.
58. St. George M, Kutas M, Martinez A, Sereno MI. 1999. Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. Brain 122:1317-1325.
59. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Josse G, Crivello F, Mazoyer B. 2004. Interindividual variability in the hemispheric organization for speech. NeuroImage 21:422-435.
60. Wernicke C. 1874. Der Aphasische Symptomencomplex. Breslau: Cohn and Weigert.
61. Wildgruber D, Riecker A, Hertrich I, Erb M, Grodd W, Ethofer T, Ackermann H. 2005. Identification of emotional intonation evaluated by fMRI. NeuroImage 24:1233-1241.
62. Wilson SM, Iacoboni M. 2006. Neural responses to non-native phonemes varying in producibility: evidence for the sensorimotor nature of speech perception. NeuroImage 33:316-325.
63. Wilson SM, Saygin AP, Sereno MI, Iacoboni M. 2004. Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nat Neurosci 7:701-702.
64. Wise RJ, Scott SK, Blank SC, Mummery CJ, Murphy K, Warburton EA. 2001. Separate neural subsystems within 'Wernicke's area'. Brain 124:83-95.
65. Worsley KJ, Liao C, Aston J, Petre V, Duncan GH, Morales F, Evans AC. 2002. A general statistical analysis for fMRI data. NeuroImage 15:1-15.
66. Xu J, Kemeny S, Park G, Frattali C, Braun A. 2005. Language in context: emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension. NeuroImage 25:1002-1015.