Loss of faith in the origins of information literacy in e-environments: Proposal of a holistic approach

Journal of Librarianship and Information Science

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 97-107

  Nazari, Maryam ^a   Webber, Sheila ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

contextual research; digital literacies; e learning; electronic information and learning environments; information literacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861949184     PISSN: 09610006     EISSN: 17416477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0961000611436095     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. American Library Association (ALA) (1989) Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report. Chicago, IL: ALA. Available at: http://www.lita.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential.cfm (accessed December 2009).
2. Andretta S.From prescribed reading to the excitement or the burden of choice: information literacy: Foundation of e-learning.Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives. 2005;57 (2): 181-190.
3. Armstrong A,Georgas H.Using interactive technology to teach information literacy concepts to undergraduate students.Reference Services Review. 2006;34 (4): 491-497.
4. Ashmore B,Grogg JE.Library virtual tours: A case study.Research Strategies. 2004;:77-88.
5. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) (2000) Information literacy competency standards for higher education: Introduction. Available at: http://archive.ala.org/acrl/il/toolkit/intro.html#highered (accessed December 2009).
6. Bawden D.Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts.Journal of Documentation. 2001;57 (2): 218-259.
7. Beddie F.Learning communities: A catalyst for collective responsibility. Proceedings of the 3rd international lifelong learning conference; 2004Yeppoon, Australia; 2004. 1.
8. BeethamHMcGillLLittlejohnA (2009) Thriving in the 21st Century: Learning Literacies for the Digital Age (LLiDA project). Glasgow: Glasgow Caledonian University. Available at: http://www.caledonianacademy.net/spaces/LLiDA/ (accessed July 2010).
9. Behrens S.A conceptual analysis and historical overview of information literacy.College & Research Libraries. 1994;55 (4): 309-322.
10. Bridgland A,Whitehead M.Information literacy in the 'E' environment: An approach for sustainability.Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2004;31 (1): 54-59.
11. Bruce CSeven Faces of Information Literacy. Adelaide, Australia: Auslib Press; 1997:.
12. Bundy AAustralian and New Zealand Information Literacy Framework: Principles, Standards and Practice. Adelaide, Australia: Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy (ANZIIL); 2004:.
13. Candy PC.Learning and earning: Graduate skills for an uncertain future. Selected papers from the inaugural international lifelong learning conference; 2000Yeppoon, Australia; 2000. 7.
14. CandyPC (2004) Linking Thinking: Self-Directed Learning in the Digital Age. Australia: Commonwealth of Australia. Available at: http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/5CBAC2EE-D568-4829-8332-0739057BBE1B/2205/report.pdf (accessed December 2009).
15. Candy PC,Crebert G,O'Leary JDeveloping Lifelong Learners through Undergraduate Education. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service; 1994:.
16. Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP) (2004) Information Literacy: The Skills. London: CILIP. Available at: http://www.cilip.org.uk/get-involved/advocacy/learning/information-literacy/Pages/skills.aspx (accessed December 2009).
17. Coomey M,Stephenson JTeaching and Learning Online: Pedagogies for New Technologies. Stephenson J, ed. London: Kogan Page; 2001:37-51.
18. Day J,Waltona G,Benta M, et al.Higher education, teaching, learning and the electronic library: A review of the literature for the IMPEL2 project: Monitoring organisational and cultural change.New Review of Academic Librarianship. 1996;2 (1): 131-204.
19. Department for Education and Skills (DFES) (2003) Towards a unified e-learning strategy consultation document. Available at: http://www.alt.ac.uk/docs/e-Learning_Strategy.pdf (accessed December 2009).
20. Doherty JJ,Hansen MA,Kaya KK.Teaching information skills in the information age: The need for critical thinking.Library Philosophy and Practice. 1999;1 (2): 1-12.
21. Dupuis EA.Automating instruction.Library Journal: Net Connect. 2001;Spring (supplement): 21-22.
22. EskolaE-L (1998) University students' information seeking behaviour in a changing learning environment-how are students' information needs, seeking and use affected by new teaching methods?Information Research4(2). Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/4-2/isic/eeskola.html (accessed December 2009).
23. FaheyN (2003) The importance of addressing accepted training needs when designing electronic information literacy training. Informing Science6: 173-185. Available at: http://inform.nu/Articles/Vol6/v6p173-185.pdf (accessed 25 January 2012).
24. FarmerL (2001) Information literacy: A whole school reform approach. In: The 67th IFLA council and general conference, Boston, USA, 16-25August2001. Available at: http://archive.ifla.org/IV/ifla67/papers/019-106e.pdf (accessed 25 January 2012).
25. Forsyth R.Supporting e-learning: An overview of the needs of users.New Review of Academic Librarianship. 2003;9 (1): 131-140.
26. Getty NK,Burd B,Burns-Feyl S, et al.Using courseware to deliver library instruction via the web: Four examples.Reference Services Review. 2000;28 (4): 349-359.
27. Grace AP.Reflecting critically on lifelong learning in an era of neoliberal paragmatism: Instrumental, social, and cultural perspectives. Lifelong learning: Partners, pathways, and pedagogies: keynote and refereed papers from the 4th international lifelong learning conference; 2006Yeppoon, Australia; 2006. 1.
28. Hadengue V.E-learning for information literacy.Library Review. 2005;54 (1): 36-46.
29. Haygarth Jackson ATraining and Education for Online. London: Taylor Graham; 1989:.
30. Herron PJ,Griner LG.Research strategies and information sources in Latin American studies: A one-credit, web-based course.Research Strategies. 2000;17 (1): 11-21.
31. The Prague Declaration: Towards an Information Literate Society. Washington, DC: National Commission on Library and Information Science, National Forum on Information Literacy & UNESCO; 2003:.
32. Johnston B,Webber SNew Fields for Research in the 21st Century. Klasson MLoughridge BLööf S, ed. Boras: University College of Boras; 1999:183-197.
33. Johnston B,Webber S.As we think: Information literacy as a discipline for the information age.Research Strategies. 2005;20 (3): 108-121.
34. Joint N.Information literacy evaluation: Moving towards virtual learning environments.Electronic Library. 2003;21 (4): 322-334.
35. KennedyC (1998) Measuring Information Literacy: The 'Tool Literacy' Variable. ERIC, ED470643. Available at: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/1a/90/31.pdf (accessed December 2009).
36. Kenny M.Lifelong learning: Sailing to Atlantis?. Proceedings of the 3rd international lifelong learning conference; 2004Yeppoon, Australia; 2004. 20.
37. KubiakC (2002) Lessons from U120 MOSAIC: Making sense of information in the connected age: drawn from an interview with Jo Parker. The Open University. Available at: http://kn.open.ac.uk/public/getfile.cfm?documentfileid=2353 (accessed 25 January 2012).
38. Langford L.Information literacy? seeking clarification.School Libraries Worldwide. 1998;4 (1): 59-72.
39. Lloyd A.Information literacy: Different contexts, different concepts, different truths?.Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 2005;37 (2): 82-88.
40. McClure CR.Network literacy: A role for libraries.Information Technology and Libraries. 1994;13 (2): 115-125.
41. Markless S.A new conception of information literacy for the digital learning environment in higher education.Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education. 2009;1 (1): 25-40.
42. Martin A.Essential e-literacy.Connected. 2003;9:22-24.
43. MasonR (2002) Review of E-Learning for Education and Training. Research Underpinnings of the UK eUniversity. Available at: http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/past/nlc2002/proceedings/symp/02.htm (accessed December 2009).
44. Morgan N,Davies L.Innovative library induction: Introducing the Cephalonian method.SCONUL Focus. 2004;32:4-8.
45. Nazari M.Design and process of a contextual study of information literacy.Library and Information Science Research. 2010;32 (3): 179-191.
46. Nazari M.A contextual model of information literacy.Journal of Information Science. 2011;37 (4): 345-359.
47. NazariMWebberS (2008) Model of geo/spatial information literacy. In: EUGISES2008: Sixth European GIS education seminar, Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester, UK, 11-14September. Available at: http://www.eugises.eu/proceedings2008/nazari.pdf (accessed 25 January 2012).
48. Nazari M,Webber S.What do the conceptions of geo/spatial information tell us about information literacy?.Journal of Documentation. 2010;67 (2): 334-354.
49. Parker JInformation Literacy, Meets Library 2.0. Goodwin PParker J, ed. London: Facet; 2008:133-138.
50. Patalong S.Using the virtual learning environment WebCT to enhance information skills teaching at Coventry University.Library Review. 2003;52 (3): 103-110.
51. RayKDayJ (1998) Student attitudes towards electronic information resources. Information Research4(2). Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/4-2/paper54.html (accessed December 2009).
52. Savolainen R.Network competence and information seeking on the Internet: From definitions towards a social cognitive model.Journal of Documentation. 2002;58 (2): 211-226.
53. ShapiroJJHughesSK (1996) Information literacy as a liberal art. Educom Review31(2). Available at: http://net.educause.edu/apps/er/review/reviewArticles/31231.html (accessed December 2009).
54. Sims R.An interactive conundrum: Constructs of interactivity and learning theory.Australian Journal of Educational Technology. 2000;16 (1): 45-57.
55. Spitzer KL,Eisenberg MB,Lowe CAInformation Literacy: Essential Skills for the Information Age. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited; 1998:.
56. Stansfield MH,McLellan E,Connolly T.Enhancing student performance in online learning and traditional face-to-face class delivery.Journal of Information Technology Education. 2004;3:173-188.
57. Sundin O.Negotiations on information-seeking expertise: A study of web-based tutorials for information literacy.Journal of Documentation. 2008;64 (1): 24-44.
58. Tiefel V.Library user education: Examining its past, projecting its future.Library Trends. 1995;44 (2): 318-338.
59. ToddR (2000) Information literacy in electronic environments: Fantasies, facts, and futures. IATUL. Available at: http://www.iatul.org/conferences/pastconferences/2000proceedings.asp (accessed 26 January 2012).
60. Unruh B.User education: The channel for communication. The 2nd international online information meeting; 1978London, UK; 1978. 65.
61. Wallace RM.Online learning in higher education: A review of research on interactions among teachers and students.Education, Communication & Information. 2003;3 (2): 241-280.
62. Walton G,Barker J,Hepworth M, et al.Using online collaborative learning to enhance information literacy delivery in a Level 1 module: An evaluation.Journal of Information Literacy. 2007;1 (1): 13-30.
63. Webber S,Johnston B.Conceptions of information literacy: New perspectives and implications.Journal of Information Science. 2000;26 (6): 381-397.
64. WilliamsP (2006) Opinion: Against information literacy. Library and Information Update5(7-8): 20. Available at: http://www.cilip.org.uk/publications/updatemagazine/archive/archive2006/july/williams.htm (accessed December 2009).
65. Zurkowski PThe Information Services Environment: Relationships and Priorities. Washington, DC: National Commission on Libraries and Information Science; 1974:.