As we may think: Information literacy as a discipline for the information age

Research Strategies

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 108-121

  Johnston, Bill ^a   Webber, Sheila ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749358092     PISSN: 07343310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resstr.2006.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Association of College and Research Libraries. Information literacy competency standards for higher education (2000), American Library Association, Washington. http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/informationliteracycompetency. htm (http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/informationliteracycompetency .htm).
2. Association of College and Research Libraries IS Research and Scholarship Committee. ACRL Research agenda: Research agenda for library instruction and information literacy. Library and Information Science Research 25 (2003) 479-487
3. Becher T. Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (1989), Society of Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Milton Keynes
4. Becher T., and Trowler P.R. Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. 2nd ed. (2001), Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Milton Keynes
5. In: Bundy A. (Ed). Australian and New Zealand information literacy framework: Principles, standards and practice. 2nd ed. (2004), Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy, Adelaide. http://www.anziil.org/resources/Info%2520lit%25202nd%2520edition.pdf (http://www.anziil.org/resources/Info%20lit%202nd%20edition.pdf).
6. Bush V. As we may think. Atlantic Monthly 176 1 (1945) 101-108. http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/%257Educhier/pub/vbush/vbush%1Eall.shtml (http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/%7Educhier/pub/vbush/vbush-all.shtml).
7. Council of Australian University Librarians. Information literacy standards (2001), Council of Australian University Librarians, Canberra. http://www.caul.edu.au/caul%1Edoc/InfoLitStandards2001.doc (http://www.caul.edu.au/caul-doc/InfoLitStandards2001.doc).
8. Delors J., et al. Learning: The treasure within: Highlights (1996), UNESCO, Paris. http://www.unesco.org/delors/delors_e.pdf (http://www.unesco.org/delors/delors_e.pdf).
9. Department of Education, Science and Training. National report on higher education in Australia 2001 (2003), DEST, Canberra. http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/higher_education/publications_resources/p rofiles/national_report_higher_education_2001.htm (http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/higher_education/publications_resources/ profiles/national_report_higher_education_2001.htm).
10. Ford N. The growth of understanding of information science: Towards a developmental model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50 12 (1999) 1141-1152
11. Greenslade R. Seen it, shot it, sold it. Guardian Media Supplement 8 (2005 August 6)
12. Holliday G. Citizen scoops. Guardian Life Supplement 4 (2005 August 19)
13. Information Literacy Meeting of Experts. The Prague declaration: Towards an information literate society (2003), National Commission on Library and Information Science; National Forum on Information Literacy and UNESCO, Washington. http://www.nclis.gov/libinter/infolitconf%20and%20meet/post%1Einfolitcon f%20and%20meet/post%1Einfolitconf%20and%20meet.html (http://www.nclis.gov/libinter/infolitconf and meet/post-infolitconf and meet/post-infolitconf and meet.html).
14. Ingwersen P. Information retrieval interaction (1992), Taylor Graham, London
15. Jarvis J. "Agents for all". Buzzmachine 1 (2005 August). http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/08/01/agents%1Efor%1Eall/ (http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/08/01/agents-for-all/).
16. Johnston B., and Watson A. Participation, reflection and integration for business and lifelong learning: Pedagogical challenges of the integrative studies programme at the University of Strathclyde Business School. Journal of Workplace Learning 16 1/2 (2004) 53-62
17. Johnston B., and Webber S. Information literacy in higher education: A review and case study. Studies in Higher Education 28 3 (2003) 335-352
18. Johnston B., and Webber S. The role of LIS faculty in the information literate university: Taking over the academy?. New Library World 105 1196/1197 (2004) 12-20
19. National Committee of Enquiry into Higher Education. Higher education in the learning society (The Dearing Report) (1997), HMSO, London
20. Reitz J. ODLIS: Online dictionary for library and information science (2005), Libraries Unlimited, Westport, CT. http://www.lu.com/odlis/odlis_l.cfm (http://www.lu.com/odlis/odlis_l.cfm).
21. Saracevic T. Information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50 12 (1999) 1051-1063
22. Shapiro J., and Hughes S.K. Information literacy as a liberal art: Enlightenment proposals for a new curriculum. Educom Review 31 2 (1996). http://www.educause.edu/pub/er/review/reviewarticles/31231.html (http://www.educause.edu/pub/er/review/reviewarticles/31231.html).
23. Thompson, S. (2003). Information literacy meeting of experts: Prague, the Czech Republic: September 20-23, 2003: Report of a meeting. Washington: United States Commission on Libraries and Information Science. http://www.nclis.gov/libinter/infolitconf and meet/post-infolitconf and meet/FinalReportPrague.pdf.
24. UK National Inventory Project. What is the information society (2000), UK National Inventory Project, London
25. Webber S. Information Science in 2003: A critique. Journal of Information Science 29 4 (2003) 311-330
26. Webber S., and Johnston B. Information literacy: The social action agenda. In: Booker D. (Ed). Information literacy: The social action agenda: Proceedings of the 5th national information literacy conference (2002), University of South Australia Library, Adelaide 68-80