The spatial regulation of meiotic recombination hotspots: Are all DSB hotspots crossover hotspots?

Experimental Cell Research

Volumn 318, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1347-1352

  Serrentino, Maria Elisabetta ^a,b   Borde, Valérie ^a,b  

^a INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Chromosome features; Double strand breaks; Homologous recombination; Hotspots; Meiosis

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; ARABIDOPSIS; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CROSSING OVER; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; DOWN SYNDROME; DROSOPHILA; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; MEIOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROCESSING; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SORDARIALES; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION;

EID: 84861923558     PISSN: 00144827     EISSN: 10902422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.03.025     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Keeney S., Giroux C.N., Kleckner N. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 1997, 88(3):375-384.
2. Neale M.J., Keeney S. Clarifying the mechanics of DNA strand exchange in meiotic recombination. Nature 2006, 442(7099):153-158.
3. Pan J., Sasaki M., Kniewel R., Murakami H., Blitzblau H.G., Tischfield S.E., Zhu X., Neale M.J., Jasin M., Socci N.D., Hochwagen A., Keeney S. A hierarchical combination of factors shapes the genome-wide topography of yeast meiotic recombination initiation. Cell 2011, 144(5):719-731.
4. Blat Y., Protacio R.U., Hunter N., Kleckner N. Physical and functional interactions among basic chromosome organizational features govern early steps of meiotic chiasma formation. Cell 2002, 111(6):791-802.
5. Panizza S., Mendoza M.A., Berlinger M., Huang L., Nicolas A., Shirahige K., Klein F. Spo11-accessory proteins link double-strand break sites to the chromosome axis in early meiotic recombination. Cell 2011, 146(3):372-383.
6. Mets D.G., Meyer B.J. Condensins regulate meiotic DNA break distribution, thus crossover frequency, by controlling chromosome structure. Cell 2009, 139(1):73-86.
7. Kauppi L., Barchi M., Baudat F., Romanienko P.J., Keeney S., Jasin M. Distinct properties of the XY pseudoautosomal region crucial for male meiosis. Science 2011, 331(6019):916-920.
8. Smagulova F., Gregoretti I.V., Brick K., Khil P., Camerini-Otero R.D., Petukhova G.V. Genome-wide analysis reveals novel molecular features of mouse recombination hotspots. Nature 2011, 472(7343):375-378.
9. Brachet E., Sommermeyer V., Borde V. Interplay between modifications of chromatin and meiotic recombination hotspots. Biol. Cell 2012, 104(2):51-69.
10. Borde V., Robine N., Lin W., Bonfils S., Geli V., Nicolas A. Histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation marks meiotic recombination initiation sites. EMBO J. 2009, 28(2):99-111.
11. Buard J., Barthes P., Grey C., de Massy B. Distinct histone modifications define initiation and repair of meiotic recombination in the mouse. EMBO J. 2009, 28(17):2616-2624.
12. Tesse S., Storlazzi A., Kleckner N., Gargano S., Zickler D. Localization and roles of Ski8p protein in Sordaria meiosis and delineation of three mechanistically distinct steps of meiotic homolog juxtaposition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100(22):12,865-12,870.
13. Lao J.P., Hunter N. Trying to avoid your sister. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8(10):e1000519.
14. Goldfarb T., Lichten M. Frequent and efficient use of the sister chromatid for DNA double-strand break repair during budding yeast meiosis. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8(10):e1000520.
15. Schwacha A., Kleckner N. Interhomolog bias during meiotic recombination: meiotic functions promote a highly differentiated interhomolog-only pathway. Cell 1997, 90(6):1123-1135.
16. Li X.C., Bolcun-Filas E., Schimenti J.C. Genetic evidence that synaptonemal complex axial elements govern recombination pathway choice in mice. Genetics 2011, 189(1):71-82.
17. Borner G.V., Kleckner N., Hunter N. Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 2004, 117(1):29-45.
18. Kleckner N., Zickler D., Jones G.H., Dekker J., Padmore R., Henle J., Hutchinson J. A mechanical basis for chromosome function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101(34):12,592-12,597.
19. Martini E., Diaz R.L., Hunter N., Keeney S. Crossover homeostasis in yeast meiosis. Cell 2006, 126(2):285-295.
20. Rosu S., Libuda D.E., Villeneuve A.M. Robust crossover assurance and regulated interhomolog access maintain meiotic crossover number. Science 2011, 334(6060):1286-1289.
21. Allers T., Lichten M. Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell 2001, 106(1):47-57.
22. Hunter N., Kleckner N. The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 2001, 106(1):59-70.
23. Lynn A., Soucek R., Borner G.V. ZMM proteins during meiosis: crossover artists at work. Chromosome Res. 2007, 15(5):591-605.
24. Fung J.C., Rockmill B., Odell M., Roeder G.S. Imposition of crossover interference through the nonrandom distribution of synapsis initiation complexes. Cell 2004, 116(6):795-802.
25. Henderson K.A., Keeney S. Tying synaptonemal complex initiation to the formation and programmed repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101(13):4519-4524.
26. Berchowitz L.E., Copenhaver G.P. Genetic interference: don't stand so close to me. Curr. Genomics 2010, 11(2):91-102.
27. Munz P. An analysis of interference in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 1994, 137(3):701-707.
28. Osman F., Dixon J., Doe C.L., Whitby M.C. Generating crossovers by resolution of nicked Holliday junctions: a role for Mus81-Eme1 in meiosis. Mol. Cell 2003, 12(3):761-774.
29. Bachrati C.Z., Borts R.H., Hickson I.D. Mobile D-loops are a preferred substrate for the Bloom's syndrome helicase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34(8):2269-2279.
30. Barber L.J., Youds J.L., Ward J.D., McIlwraith M.J., O'Neil N.J., Petalcorin M.I., Martin J.S., Collis S.J., Cantor S.B., Auclair M., Tissenbaum H., West S.C., Rose A.M., Boulton S.J. RTEL1 maintains genomic stability by suppressing homologous recombination. Cell 2008, 135(2):261-271.
31. Prakash R., Satory D., Dray E., Papusha A., Scheller J., Kramer W., Krejci L., Klein H., Haber J.E., Sung P., Ira G. Yeast Mph1 helicase dissociates Rad51-made D-loops: implications for crossover control in mitotic recombination. Genes Dev. 2009, 23(1):67-79.
32. Youds J.L., Mets D.G., McIlwraith M.J., Martin J.S., Ward J.D., NJ O.N., Rose A.M., West S.C., Meyer B.J., Boulton S.J. RTEL-1 enforces meiotic crossover interference and homeostasis. Science 2010, 327(5970):1254-1258.
33. De Muyt, A., L. Jessop, E. Kolar, and M. Lichten, BLM helicase ortholog Sgs1 is a central regulator of meiotic recombination intermediate metabolism. Mol. Cell, in press.
34. Jessop L., Rockmill B., Roeder G.S., Lichten M. Meiotic chromosome synapsis-promoting proteins antagonize the anti-crossover activity of sgs1. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2(9):e155.
35. Oh S.D., Lao J.P., Hwang P.Y., Taylor A.F., Smith G.R., Hunter N. BLM ortholog, Sgs1, prevents aberrant crossing-over by suppressing formation of multichromatid joint molecules. Cell 2007, 130(2):259-272.
36. Wu L., Hickson I.D. The Bloom's syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination. Nature 2003, 426(6968):870-874.
37. Martini E., Borde V., Legendre M., Audic S., Regnault B., Soubigou G., Dujon B., Llorente B. Genome-wide analysis of heteroduplex DNA in mismatch repair-deficient yeast cells reveals novel properties of meiotic recombination pathways. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7(9):e1002305.
38. Holloway K., Lawson V.E., Jeffreys A.J. Allelic recombination and de novo deletions in sperm in the human beta-globin gene region. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2006, 15(7):1099-1111.
39. Cole F., Keeney S., Jasin M. Comprehensive, fine-scale dissection of homologous recombination outcomes at a hot spot in mouse meiosis. Mol. Cell 2010, 39(5):700-710.
40. Parvanov E.D., Ng S.H., Petkov P.M., Paigen K. Trans-regulation of mouse meiotic recombination hotspots by Rcr1. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7(2):e36.
41. Mancera E., Bourgon R., Brozzi A., Huber W., Steinmetz L.M. High-resolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and non-crossovers in yeast. Nature 2008, 454(7203):479-485.
42. Hyppa R.W., Smith G.R. Crossover invariance determined by partner choice for meiotic DNA break repair. Cell 2010, 142(2):243-255.
43. Borde V., Goldman A.S., Lichten M. Direct coupling between meiotic DNA replication and recombination initiation. Science 2000, 290(5492):806-809.
44. Buhler C., Borde V., Lichten M. Mapping meiotic single-strand DNA reveals a new landscape of DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5(12):e324.
45. Chen S.Y., Tsubouchi T., Rockmill B., Sandler J.S., Richards D.R., Vader G., Hochwagen A., Roeder G.S., Fung J.C. Global analysis of the meiotic crossover landscape. Dev. Cell 2008, 15(3):401-415.