Load-bearing capacity of handmade and computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing-fabricated three-unit fixed dental prostheses of particulate filler composite

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 144-150

  Göncü Başaran, Emine ^a   Ayna, Emrah ^a   Vallittu, Pekka K ^b   Lassila, Lippo V J ^b  

^a DICLE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Experimental composite; fixed dental prostheses; load bearing capacity

Indexed keywords

BARIUM DERIVATIVE; BARIUM OXIDE; NANOPARTICLE; OXIDE; RESIN; SILICATE; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PARTICLE SIZE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; WEIGHT BEARING;

BARIUM COMPOUNDS; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; NANOPARTICLES; OXIDES; PARTICLE SIZE; SILICATES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; WEIGHT-BEARING; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 79955021844     PISSN: 00016357     EISSN: 15023850     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2010.545034     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Mante F, Saleh N, Mante M. Softening patterns of post-cure heattreated dental composites. Dent Mater 1993;9:325-31.
2. Sarrett DC. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21:9-20. (Pubitemid 40135726)
3. Van Nieuwenhuysen JP, D'Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent 2003;31:395-405. (Pubitemid 36870889)
4. Mjör IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 2000;58:97-101.
5. Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:185-94. (Pubitemid 33771574)
6. Lutz F, Phillips RW. A classification and evaluation of composite resin systems. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:480-8.
7. Bayne SC, Thompson JY. Mechanical property analysis of two admixed PRIMM-modified commercial dental composites. Trans Acad Dent Mater 1996;9:238.
8. Ferracane JL, Berge HX, Condon JR. In vitro aging of dental composites in waterDeffect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filler/matrix coupling. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;42:465-72. (Pubitemid 28452524)
9. Asmussen E. Restorative resins: hardness and strength vs. quantity of remaining double bonds. Scand J Dent Res 1982;90:484-9. (Pubitemid 13178111)
10. van Heumen CC, van Dijken JW, Tanner J, Pikaar R, Lassila LV, Creugers NH, et al. Five-year survival of 3-unit fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures in the anterior area. Dent Mater 2009;25:820-7.
11. Bagis B, Ustaomer S, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Provisional repair of a zirconia fixed partial denture with fibre-reinforced restorative composite: a clinical report. J Canadian Dent Assoc 2009;75:133-7.
12. Uctasli S, Tezvergil A, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. The degree of conversion of fiber-reinforced composites polymerized using different light-curing sources. Dent Mater 2005;21:469-75. (Pubitemid 40467037)
13. Vallittu PK. Survival rates of resin-bonded, glass fiber reinforced composite fixed partial dentures with a mean follow-up of 42 months: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:241-7.
14. Ritter AV. Direct resin-based composites: Current recommendations for optimal clinical results. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2005;26:481-2.
15. Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative dental materials, 11th ed. Mosby: St. Louis, MO; 2002. p. 237.
16. Darvell BW. Material science for dentistry, 7th ed. Hong Kong, PRC: University of Hong Kong; 2002. p. 1-5.
17. Baltzer A, Kaufmann-Jinoian V. VITA CAD-Temp for in Lab and Cerec 3D. Int J Comput Dent 2007;10:99-103.
18. Dyer SR, Lassila LV, Jokinen M, Vallittu PK. Effect of fiber position and orientation on fracture load of fiber-reinforced composite. Dent Mater 2004;20:947-55. (Pubitemid 40146124)
19. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. The application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1382-90. (Pubitemid 38019463)
20. Howard NY. Advanced use of an esthetic indirect posterior resin system. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1997;18:1044-54.
21. Touati B, Aidan N. Second generation laboratory composite resins for indirect restorations. J Esthet Dent 1997;9:108-18. (Pubitemid 127789552)
22. Mörmann WH. The evaluation of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:7-13.
23. Vanoorbeek S, Vandamme K, Lijnen I, Naert I. Computeraided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study. Int J Prost 2010;23:223-30.
24. Curtis AR, Palin WM, Fleming GJP, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. The mechanical properties of nanofilled Filler composite 149 resin-based composites: The impact of dry and wet cyclic pre-loading on bi-axial flexure strength. Dent Mater 2009;25:188-97.
25. Curtis AR, Palin WM, Fleming GJP, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites. Characterising discrete filler particles and nanoclusters using a novel micromanipulation technique. Dent Mater 2009;25:180-7.
26. Curtis AR, Shortall AC, Marquis PM, Palin WM. Water uptake characteristics of a nano-filled resin-based composite. J Dent 2008;36:186-93.
27. Da Fonte Porto Carreiro A, Dos Santos Cruz CA, Vergani CE. Hardness and compressive strength of indirect composite resins: effects of immersion in distilled water. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:1085-9. (Pubitemid 39540390)
28. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties of new composite restorative materials. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:353-61. (Pubitemid 30608799)
29. Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Strength and fatigue performance versus filler fraction of different types of direct dental restoratives. J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater 2006;76:114-20. (Pubitemid 43062751)
30. Calheiros F, Kawano Y, Stansbury JW, Braga RR. Influence of radiant exposure on concentration stress, degree of conversion and mechanical properties of resin composites. Dent Mater 2006;22:799-803. (Pubitemid 44148806)
31. de Moraes RR, Gonçalves Lde S, Lancellotti AC, Consani S, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA. Nanohybrid resin composites: nanofiller loaded materials or traditional microhybrid resins? Oper Dent 2009;34:551-7.
32. Beun S, Glorieux T, Devaux J, Vreven J, Leloup G. Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. Dent Mater 2007;23:51-9. (Pubitemid 44880065)
33. Lassila LVJ, Nohrström T, Vallittu PK. The influence of short-term water storage on the flexural properties of unidirectional glass fiber-reinforced composite. Biomaterials 2002;23:2221-9. (Pubitemid 34226582)
34. Jones M, Bayne SC, Thompson JY. Effects of branched-fiber filler additions on dental composite mechanical properties. J Dent Res 1997;76:76.
35. Rapp MM, Thompson JY, Bayne SC, Rathbun K. Development of pre-polymerized branched-fiber filler particles. J Dent Res 1998;77:518.
36. Ruddle DE, Maloney MM, Thompson IY. Effect of novel filler particles on the mechanical and wear properties of dental composites. Dent Mater 2002;18:72-80. (Pubitemid 40072303)
37. Keulemans F, Lassila LV, Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. The influence of framework design on the load-bearing capacity of laboratory-made inlayretained fibre-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses. J Biomech 2009;42:844-9.
38. Fischer H, Weber M, Eck M, Erdrich A, Marx R. Finite element and experimental analyses of polymer-based dental bridges reinforced by ceramic bars. J Biomech 2004;37:289-94. (Pubitemid 38156076)
39. Scherrer SS, de Rijk WG. The fracture resistance of allceramic crowns on supporting structures with different elastic moduli. Int J Prost 1993;6:462-7.
40. Tinschert J, Natt G, Doose B, Fischer H, Marx R. High performance ceramic posterior bridges. Dtsch Zahnarztliche Z 1999;54:545-50.