In-vitro simulation of tooth mobility for static and dynamic load tests: A pilot study

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

Volumn 69, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 316-318

  Sterzenbach, Guido ^a   Kalberlah, Sven ^a   Beuer, Florian ^b   Frankenberger, Roland ^c   Naumann, Michael ^d  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Chewing simulation; thermocycling and mechanical loading; thermomechanical loading

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; ELASTOMER; MOLLOSIL PLUS; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; SILASTIC; SILOXANE;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL PROCEDURE; HUMAN; IMPREGUM; INSTRUMENTATION; MASTICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; PERIODONTAL LIGAMENT; PILOT STUDY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; BICUSPID; BITE FORCE; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTOMERS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PERIODONTAL LIGAMENT; PILOT PROJECTS; POLYURETHANES; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; SILICONE ELASTOMERS; SILOXANES; TOOTH MOBILITY;

EID: 80052080332     PISSN: 00016357     EISSN: 15023850     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2011.563244     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Naumann M, Metzdorf G, Fokkinga W, Watzke R, Sterzenbach G, Bayne S, et al. Influence of test parameters on in vitro fracture resistance of post-endodontic restorations: A structured review. J Oral Rehabil 2009;36:299-312.
2. Zhurov AI, Limbert G, Aeschlimann DP, Middleton J. A constitutive model for the periodontal ligament as a compressible transversely isotropic visco-hyperelastic tissue. Comput Meth Biomech Biomed Eng 2007;10:223-35.
3. Soares CJ, Pizi EC, Fonseca RB, Martins LR. Influence of root embedment material and periodontal ligament simulation on fracture resistance tests. Braz Oral Res 2005;19:11-16.
4. NaumannM, Rosentritt M, Preuss A, Dietrich T. The effect of alveolarbonelossonthe loadcapabilityof restored endodontically treated teeth: A comparative in vitro study. J Dent 2006;34:790-5. (Pubitemid 44764939)
5. Ona M, Wakabayashi N. Influence of alveolar support on stress in periodontal structures. J Dent Res 2006;85:1087-91. (Pubitemid 44935526)
6. Dittmer MP, Kohorst P, Borchers L, Stiesch M. Influence of the supporting structure on stress distribution in all-ceramic FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:63-8.
7. Scharnagl P, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Leibrock A, Lang R, Handel G. Simulation of physiological tooth mobility in in vitro stress examination of dental restorations in the masticator. J Dent Res 1997;IADR/CED abstracts 431:114.
8. Heydecke G,ButzF, Hussein A, Strub JR. Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems.JProsthetDent2002;87:438-45. (Pubitemid 40433973)
9. Butz F, Lennon AM, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: An in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:58-64. (Pubitemid 33671958)
10. Mühlemann HR. Periodontometry, a method for measuring tooth mobility. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1951;4: 1220-33.