Global analysis of chaperone effects using a reconstituted cell-free translation system

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 23, 2012, Pages 8937-8942

  Niwa, Tatsuya ^a   Kanamori, Takashi ^b,c   Ueda, Takuya ^b   Taguchi, Hideki ^a  

^a TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c GeneFrontier Corporation   (Japan)

Author keywords

Aggregates; Chaperonin; Hsp60; Hsp70; Proteome

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; CHAPERONIN; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEIN; PROTEIN DNAJ; PROTEIN DNAK; PROTEIN GRPE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL FREE SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN AGGREGATION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; SOLUBILITY;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BINDING SITES; CELL-FREE SYSTEM; CHAPERONIN 10; CHAPERONIN 60; CYTOPLASM; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; HSP40 HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; HSP70 HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; MOLECULAR CHAPERONES; PEPTIDYLPROLYL ISOMERASE; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEOMICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOLUBILITY;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

EID: 84861850079     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1201380109     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Dobson CM (2003) Protein folding and misfolding. Nature 426:884-890.
2. Anfinsen CB (1973) Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 181: 223-230.
3. Tyedmers J, Mogk A, Bukau B (2010) Cellular strategies for controlling protein aggregation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:777-788.
4. Hartl FU, Bracher A, Hayer-Hartl M (2011) Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature 475:324-332.
5. Ellis J (1987) Proteins as molecular chaperones. Nature 328:378-379.
6. Niwa T, et al. (2009) Bimodal protein solubility distribution revealed by an aggregation analysis of the entire ensemble of Escherichia coli proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:4201-4206.
7. Hoffmann A, Bukau B, Kramer G (2010) Structure and function of the molecular chaperone Trigger Factor. Biochim Biophys Acta 1803:650-661.
8. Mayer MP, Bukau B (2005) Hsp70 chaperones: Cellular functions and molecular mechanism. Cell Mol Life Sci 62:670-684.
9. Richter K, Haslbeck M, Buchner J (2010) The heat shock response: Life on the verge of death. Mol Cell 40:253-266.
10. Thirumalai D, Lorimer GH (2001) Chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 30:245-269. (Pubitemid 32566164)
11. Taguchi H (2005) Chaperonin GroEL meets the substrate protein as a "load" of the rings. J Biochem 137:543-549.
12. Horwich AL, Fenton WA, Chapman E, Farr GW (2007) Two families of chaperonin: Physiology and mechanism. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 23:115-145.
13. Deuerling E, Schulze-Specking A, Tomoyasu T, Mogk A, Bukau B (1999) Trigger factor and DnaK cooperate in folding of newly synthesized proteins. Nature 400:693-696.
14. Teter SA, et al. (1999) Polypeptide flux through bacterial Hsp70: DnaK cooperates with trigger factor in chaperoning nascent chains. Cell 97:755-765. (Pubitemid 29278049)
15. Deuerling E, et al. (2003) Trigger Factor and DnaK possess overlapping substrate pools and binding specificities. Mol Microbiol 47:1317-1328. (Pubitemid 36307854)
16. Gragerov A, et al. (1992) Cooperation of GroEL/GroES and DnaK/DnaJ heat shock proteins in preventing protein misfolding in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:10341-10344.
17. Vorderwülbecke S, et al. (2004) Low temperature or GroEL/ES overproduction permits growth of Escherichia coli cells lacking trigger factor and DnaK. FEBS Lett 559: 181-187. (Pubitemid 38186725)
18. Genevaux P, et al. (2004) In vivo analysis of the overlapping functions of DnaK and trigger factor. EMBO Rep 5:195-200. (Pubitemid 38401201)
19. Ying BW, Taguchi H, Kondo M, Ueda T (2005) Co-translational involvement of the chaperonin GroEL in the folding of newly translated polypeptides. J Biol Chem 280: 12035-12040. (Pubitemid 40418522)
20. Ying BW, Taguchi H, Ueda T (2006) Co-translational binding of GroEL to nascent polypeptides is followed by post-translational encapsulation by GroES to mediate protein folding. J Biol Chem 281:21813-21819. (Pubitemid 44181885)
21. Arifuzzaman M, et al. (2006) Large-scale identification of protein-protein interaction of Escherichia coli K-12. Genome Res 16:686-691.
22. Gong Y, et al. (2009) An atlas of chaperone-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Implications to protein folding pathways in the cell. Mol Syst Biol 5:275.
23. Masters M, et al. (2009) Protein folding in Escherichia coli: The chaperonin GroE and its substrates. Res Microbiol 160:267-277.
24. Azia A, Unger R, Horovitz A (2012) What distinguishes GroEL substrates from other Escherichia coli proteins? FEBS J 279:543-550.
25. Shimizu Y, et al. (2001) Cell-free translation reconstituted with purified components. Nat Biotechnol 19:751-755. (Pubitemid 32729537)
26. Shimizu Y, Kanamori T, Ueda T (2005) Protein synthesis by pure translation systems. Methods 36:299-304. (Pubitemid 41074961)
27. Ying BW, Taguchi H, Ueda H, Ueda T (2004) Chaperone-assisted folding of a single-chain antibody in a reconstituted translation system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 320:1359-1364. (Pubitemid 38916693)
28. Agashe VR, et al. (2004) Function of trigger factor and DnaK in multidomain protein folding: Increase in yield at the expense of folding speed. Cell 117:199-209. (Pubitemid 38496240)
29. Hoffmann A, et al. (2006) Trigger factor forms a protective shield for nascent poly-peptides at the ribosome. J Biol Chem 281:6539-6545. (Pubitemid 43847587)
30. Kerner MJ, et al. (2005) Proteome-wide analysis of chaperonin-dependent protein folding in Escherichia coli. Cell 122:209-220. (Pubitemid 41032985)
31. Fujiwara K, Ishihama Y, Nakahigashi K, Soga T, Taguchi H (2010) A systematic survey of in vivo obligate chaperonin-dependent substrates. EMBO J 29:1552-1564.
32. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C (1995) SCOP: A structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 247: 536-540.
33. Jain E, et al. (2009) Infrastructure for the life sciences: Design and implementation of the UniProt website. BMC Bioinformatics 10:136.
34. Van Durme J, et al. (2009) Accurate prediction of DnaK-peptide binding via homology modelling and experimental data. PLOS Comput Biol 5:e1000475.
35. Langer T, et al. (1992) Successive action of DnaK, DnaJ and GroEL along the pathway of chaperone-mediated protein folding. Nature 356:683-689.
36. Tartaglia GG, Dobson CM, Hartl FU, Vendruscolo M (2010) Physicochemical determinants of chaperone requirements. J Mol Biol 400:579-588.
37. Castillo V, Graña-Montes R, Ventura S (2011) The aggregation properties of Escherichia coli proteins associated with their cellular abundance. Biotechnol J 6:752-760.
38. Ewalt KL, Hendrick JP, Houry WA, Hartl FU (1997) In vivo observation of polypeptide flux through the bacterial chaperonin system. Cell 90:491-500. (Pubitemid 27347239)
39. Mogk A, et al. (1999) Identification of thermolabile Escherichia coli proteins: Prevention and reversion of aggregation by DnaK and ClpB. EMBO J 18:6934-6949. (Pubitemid 30000447)
40. Sakikawa C, Taguchi H, Makino Y, Yoshida M (1999) On the maximum size of proteins to stay and fold in the cavity of GroEL underneath GroES. J Biol Chem 274: 21251-21256.
41. Kitagawa M, et al. (2005) Complete set of ORF clones of Escherichia coli ASKA library (a complete set of E. coli K-12 ORF archive): Unique resources for biological research. DNA Res 12:291-299.
42. Riley M, et al. (2006) Escherichia coli K-12: A cooperatively developed annotation snapshot - 2005. Nucleic Acids Res 34:1-9. (Pubitemid 43160031)
43. Kazuta Y, et al. (2008) Comprehensive analysis of the effects of Escherichia coli ORFs on protein translation reaction. Mol Cell Proteomics 7:1530-1540.
44. Kubo Y, et al. (1999) Two distinct mechanisms operate in the reactivation of heatdenatured proteins by the mitochondrial Hsp70/Mdj1p/Yge1p chaperone system. J Mol Biol 286:447-464. (Pubitemid 29090162)
45. Motojima F, et al. (2000) Hydrophilic residues at the apical domain of GroEL contribute to GroES binding but attenuate polypeptide binding. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 267:842-849. (Pubitemid 30099411)
46. Koike-Takeshita A, Yoshida M, Taguchi H (2008) Revisiting the GroEL-GroES reaction cycle via the symmetric intermediate implied by novel aspects of the GroEL(D398A) mutant. J Biol Chem 283:23774-23781.
47. Madera M, Vogel C, Kummerfeld SK, Chothia C, Gough J (2004) The SUPERFAMILY database in 2004: Additions and improvements. Nucleic Acids Res 32(Database issue): D235-D239. (Pubitemid 38081646)