Evaluating prior scholarship in literature reviews of research articles: A comparative study of practices in two research paradigms

English for Specific Purposes

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 188-201

  Kwan, Becky S C ^a   Chan, Hang ^a   Lam, Colin ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Academic evaluations; Behavioural science research; Design science research; Information Systems; Literature reviews; Research articles

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861770950     PISSN: 08894906     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2012.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. (October 24, 2008). Editorial charter. <>. http://tois.acm.org/charter.html.
2. Ahmad U.K. Research article introductions in Malay: Rhetoric in an emerging research community. Culture and styles of academic discourse 1997, 273-303. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany. A. Duszak (Ed.).
3. Anthony L. Writing research article introductions in software engineering: How accurate is a standard model?. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 1999, 42:38-46.
4. Balocco A.E. Who's afraid of literature? Rhetorical routines in literary research Articles. ESPecialist 2000, 21(2):207-223.
5. Bazerman C. Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science 1988, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.
6. Becher T., Trowler P.R. Academic tribes and territories 2001, The Society for Research and Higher Education & Open University Press, Buckingham, England. 2nd ed.
7. Belcher D. The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes 1994, 13:23-34.
8. Berkenkotter C., Huckin T.N. Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition, culture, power 1995, L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
9. Boote D., Beile P. Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher 2005, 34:3-15.
10. Bunton, D. (2002). Generic moves in Ph.D. Thesis introductions. In Flowerdew, J. (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 57-75). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
11. Burgess S. Packed houses and intimate gatherings: Audience and rhetorical structure. Academic discourse 2002, 196-215. Pearson Education, London. J. Flowerdew (Ed.).
12. Cheng A. ESP classroom research: Basic consideration and future research questions. New directions in English for specific purposes 2011, 44-72. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MN. D. Belcher, A.M. Johns, B. Paltridge (Eds.).
13. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. 2nd ed.
14. Creswell J.W. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach 2009, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
15. Dressen D. Geologists' implicit persuasive strategies and the construction of evaluative evidence. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2003, 2:273-290.
16. Duszak A. Academic discourse and intellectual styles. Journal of Pragmatics 1994, 21:291-313.
17. Flowerdew J. Attitudes of journal editors to nonnative speaker contributions. TESOL Quarterly 2001, 35:121-150.
18. Fredrickson K.M., Swales J.M. Competition and discourse community: Introductions from Nysvenska studier. Text and talk in professional contexts: Selected papers from the International Conference " Discourse and the Professions" 26/29 August, 1992 1994, 9-22. ASLA, Sweden. B.L. Gunnarsson, P. Linell, B. Nordberg (Eds.).
19. Giannoni D.S. Mapping academic values in the disciplines: A corpus-based approach 2010, Peter Lang, Bern, Switzerland.
20. Hart C. Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination 1998, Sage, London.
21. Hevner A.R., March S.T., Park J. Design. Science research in information systems. MIS Quarterly 2004, 28(1):75-105.
22. Huff A.S. Designing research for publication 2009, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
23. Hunston S. Evaluation and ideology in scientific writing. Register and analysis: Theory and practice 1993, 57-73. Printers Publishers, London. M. Ghadessy (Ed.).
24. Hunston S. Professional conflict: Disagreement in academic discourse. Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair 1993, 115-134. John Benjamins, Philadelphia, PA. M. Baker, G. Francis, E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.).
25. Hunston S. Evaluation and planes of discourse: Status and values in persuasive texts. Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse 2000, 176-205. Oxford University Press, Philadelphia, PA. S. Hunston, G. Thompson (Eds.).
26. Hunston S., Thompson G. Evaluation: An introduction. Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse 2000, 1-27. Oxford University Press, Philadelphia, PA. S. Hunston, G. Thompson (Eds.).
27. Hyland K. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies VII 2005, 2:173-191.
28. Hyland K., Diani G. Introduction: Academic evaluation and review genres. Academic evaluation: Review genres in university settings 2009, 1-16. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY. K. Hyland, G. Diani (Eds.).
29. Information and Management (2010). Information and management: The international journal of information systems applications. Retrieved from: <>. http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505553/description#description.
30. Kaufer D.S., Geisler C. Novelty in academic writing. Written Communication 1989, 6(3):286-311.
31. Kwan, B. S. C. (2005). A genre analysis of literature reviews in doctoral theses. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
32. Kwan B.S.C. The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes 2006, 25(1):30-55.
33. Kwan B.S.C. The nexus of reading, writing and researching in the doctoral undertaking of humanities and social sciences: Implications for literature reviewing. English for Specific Purposes 2008, 27(1):42-56.
34. Kwan B.S.C. Reading in preparation for writing a PhD dissertation: Case studies of experiences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2009, 3(3):180-191.
35. Lee S. A contrastive rhetorical study on Korean and English research paper introductions. Journal of Pan Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics 2000, 4(2):316-336.
36. Lewin B.A., Fine J., Young L. Expository discourse: A genre-based approach to social science research texts 2001, Continuum, New York, NY.
37. Lyons P., Doueck H.J. The dissertation: From beginning to end 2010, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
38. Machi L.A., McEvoy B.T. The literature review 2009, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
39. MAXQDA. (2006). VERBI software. Berlin, Germany.
40. Melander B. Culture or genres? Issues in the interpretation of cross-cultural differences in scientific articles. Genre studies in English for academic purposes 1998, 211-226. Universitat Jaume I, Castello de la Plana, Spain. I. Fortanet, S. Posteguillo, J.C. Palmer, J.F. Coll (Eds.).
41. MIS Quarterly. (2010-2011). About MIS Quarterly. Retrieved from: <>. http://www.misq.org/mission.
42. Myers G. Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge 1990, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WN.
43. Nwogu K.N.N. The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes 1997, 16(2):129-138.
44. Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2010). A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 10 (26). Retrieved from: <>. http://sprouts.aisnet.org/10-26.
45. Pique J., Andreu-Beso J.V. Bridging the gap in scientific articles. Genre studies in English for academic purposes 1998, 173-191. Universitat Jaume I, Castello de la Plana, Spain. I. Fortanet, S. Posteguillo, J.C. Palmer, J.F. Coll (Eds.).
46. Posteguillo S. The schematic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes 1999, 18:139-160.
47. Samraj B. Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 2002, 21:1-17.
48. Ridley D. The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students 2008, Sage, Los Angeles, CA.
49. Shaw P. Evaluation and promotion across languages. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2003, 2:343-357.
50. Soler-Monreal, C., Carbonell-Olivares, M., & Gil-Salom, L. (2011). A contrastive study of the rhetorical organisation of English and Spanish. PhD thesis introductions. English for Specific Purposes 30, 4-17.
51. Stotesbury H. Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2003, 2:327-341.
52. Swales J.M. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
53. Swales J.M., Feak C.B. Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills 2004, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MN.
54. Thompson P. Literature reviews in applied PhD theses: Evidence and problems. Academic evaluation: Review genres in university settings 2009, 50-67. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY. K. Hyland, G. Diani (Eds.).
55. Transactions On Knowledge And Data Engineering. (2011). About TDKE. Retrieved from: <>. http://www.computer.org/portal/web/tkde/about.
56. Tucker P. Evaluation in the art-historical research article. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2003, 2:291-312.
57. Weissberg R., Buker S. Writing up research: Experimental research report writing for students of English 1990, Prentice-Hall Regents, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
58. Western S., Roy M., Kim C. Cross-fertilization of knowledge: The case of MIS and its reference discipline. Information Resources Management Journal 1994, 7(2):24-34.
59. Zuengler J., Carroll H. Reflections on the steady increase in submissions. Modern Language Journal 2010, 94(4):637-638.