Evaluation in the art-historical research article

Journal of English for Academic Purposes

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 291-312

  Tucker, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF URBINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Art history; Disciplinary writing; Evaluation; Introduction section; Reporting verbs; Research article

Indexed keywords

EID: 23744462798     PISSN: 14751585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00047-X     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Baxandall, M. (1979). The language of art history. New Literary History, 10, 453-465.
2. Baxandall, M. (1985). Patterns of intention. On the historical explanation of pictures. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
3. Baxandall, M. (1991). The language of art criticism. In S. Kemal, & I. Gaskell (Eds.), The language of art history (pp. 67-75). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed). London/New York/Sydney/Auckland: Arnold.
5. Hunston, S. (1993). Professional conflict. Disagreement in academic discourse. In M. Baker, et al. (Eds.), Text and technology. In honour of John Sinclair (pp. 115-134). Philadelphia/Amsterdam: Benjamins.
6. Hunston, S. (2000). Evaluation and the planes of discourse: status and value in persuasive texts. In S. Hunston, & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text. Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 176-207). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Hunston, S., & Sinclair, J. (2000). A local grammar of evaluation. In S. Hunston, & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text. Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 74-101). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Hunston, S., Thompson, G. (Eds.). (2000). Evaluation in text. Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses. Social interaction in academic writing. Harlow: Pearson Education.
10. Kemal, S., Gaskell, I. (Eds.). (1991). The language of art history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English. In S. Hunston, & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text. Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 142-175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Matthiessen, C. (1995). Lexicogrammatical cartography: English systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers.
13. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis. English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Thompson, G., & Ye, Y. (1991). Evaluation in reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12, 365-382.