The significance of traceability in consumer decision making towards Karoo lamb

Food Research International

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 210-217

  du Plessis, Henriëtta J ^a   du Rand, Gerrie E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Conjoint analysis; Consumer decision making; Karoo lamb; Place of origin; Traceability

Indexed keywords

CONJOINT ANALYSIS; CONSUMER DECISION MAKING; KAROO LAMB; PLACE OF ORIGIN; TRACEABILITY;

MEATS; SUPPLY CHAINS;

DECISION MAKING;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

EID: 84861722215     PISSN: 09639969     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.05.029     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Babbie E. The practice of social research 2010, Wadsworth. 12th Ed.
2. Bless C., Higson-Smith C. Social research methods 1995, Juta, Cape Town. South Africa. 2nd Ed.
3. Bertoloni M., Bevilacqua M., Massini R. FMECA approach to product traceability in the food industry. Food Control 2006, 17:137-145.
4. Green P.E., Srinivasan V. Conjoint analyses in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. The Journal of Marketing 1990, 54(4). -19.
5. Hair J., Bush R., Ortinau D. Marketing research within the changing environment 2006, McGraw Hill, New York. 3rd Ed.
6. Kirsten J., Troskie D., Vermeulen H., Schönfeldt H., Bramley C. The potential for Karoo lamb as origin based meat and a geographical indication. Research report 2008, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development. University of Pretoria, South Africa.
7. Koo L.C., Tao F.K.C., Yeung J.H.C. Preferential segmentation of restaurant attributes through conjoint analysis. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 1999, 11(5):242-250.
8. Kuznesof S., Tregear A., Moxey A. Regional foods: A consumer perspective. British Food Journal 1997, 99(6):199-206.
9. Leedy P.D., Ormrod J.E. Practical research: Planning and design. Pearson Education International 2010, 9th Ed.
10. McGivern Y. The practice of marketing research 2009, Prentice Hall, Edinburg. 3rd Ed.
11. Neuman W.L. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approach 2000, Allyn & Bacon, Boston. 4th Ed.
12. North E., De Vos R. The use of conjoint analysis to determine consumer buying preferences: A literature review. Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences 2002, 30:32-39.
13. Orme B. Getting started with conjoint analysis: Strategies for project design and pricing research 2010, Research Publishers LLC, Madison, Wis. 2nd Ed.
14. Rabiee F. Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 2004, 63:655-660.
15. Smith G.C., Tatum J.D., Belk K.E., Scanga J.A., Grandin T., Sofos J.N. Traceability from a US perspective. Meat science 2005, 71:174-193.
16. Van Ittersum K. The role of region of origin in consumer decision making and choice 2002, Mansholt Graduate School of Social Sciences, Wageningen. The Netherlands.
17. Verbeke W., Ward R.W. Consumer interest in information cues denoting quality, traceability and origin: An application of ordered probit models to beef labels. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17:453-467.
18. Verbeke W. The emerging role of traceability and information in demand-oriented livestock production. Outlook on Agriculture 2001, 30(4):249-255.