Picture superiority doubly dissociates the ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1247-1262

  Curran, Tim ^a   Doyle, Jeanne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BRAIN; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; EXPERIMENT; HUMAN; MEMORY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; MALE; PARIETAL LOBE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VOCABULARY;

EID: 79551666960     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21464     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Alain, C., Achim, A., & Woods, D. L. (1999). Separate memory-related processing for auditory frequency and patterns. Psychophysiology, 36, 737-744. (Pubitemid 29498331)
2. Ally, B. A., & Budson, A. E. (2007). The worth of pictures: Using high density event-related potentials to understand the memorial power of pictures and the dynamics of recognition memory. Neuroimage, 35, 378-395.
3. Azimian-Faridani, N., & Wilding, E. L. (2006). The influence of criterion shifts on electrophysiological correlates of recognition memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1075-1086. (Pubitemid 44066112)
4. Berry, C. J., Shanks, D. R., & Henson, R. N. (2008). A unitary signal-detection model of implicit and explicit memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 367-373.
5. Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 657-668.
6. Boldini, A., Russo, R., Punia, S., & Avons, S. E. (2007). Reversing the picture superiority effect: A speed-accuracy tradeoff study of recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 35, 113-123.
7. Brockdorff, N., & Lamberts, K. (2000). A feature-sampling account of the time course of old-new recognition judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 77-102.
8. Budson, A. E., Droller, D. B., Dodson, C. S., Schacter, D. L., Rugg, M. D., Holcomb, P. J., et al. (2005). Electrophysiological dissociation of picture versus word encoding: The distinctiveness heuristic as a retrieval orientation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1181-1193.
9. Butler, L. T., & Berry, D. C. (2001). Implicit memory: Intention and awareness revisited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 192-197.
10. Curran, T. (2000). Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 28, 923-938.
11. Curran, T. (2004). Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1088-1106.
12. Curran, T., & Cleary, A. M. (2003). Using ERPs to dissociate recollection from familiarity in picture recognition. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 191-205. (Pubitemid 35335788)
13. Curran, T., DeBuse, C., Woroch, B., & Hirshman, E. (2006). Combined pharmacological and electrophysiological dissociation of familiarity and recollection. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 1979-1985.
14. Curran, T., & Dien, J. (2003). Differentiating amodal familiarity from modality-specific memory processes: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 40, 979-988. (Pubitemid 37428932)
15. Curran, T., & Hancock, J. (2007). The FN400 indexes familiarity-based recognition of faces. Neuroimage, 36, 464-471. (Pubitemid 46710447)
16. Curran, T., Tepe, K. L., & Piatt, C. (2006). ERP explorations of dual processes in recognition memory. In H. D. Zimmer, A. Mecklinger, & U. Lindenberger (Eds.), Binding in human memory: A neurocognitive approach (pp. 467-492). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17-22.
18. Dewhurst, S. A., & Conway, M. A. (1994). Pictures, images, and recollective experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1088-1098.
19. Dien, J. (1998). Issues in the application of the average reference: Review, critiques, and recommendations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 30, 34-43.
20. Dunn, J. C. (2004). Remember-know: A matter of confidence. Psychological Review, 111, 524-542.
21. Dunn, J. C., & Kirsner, K. (1988). Discovering functionally independent mental processes: The principal of reversed association. Psychological Review, 95, 91-101.
22. Dunn, J. C., & Kirsner, K. (2003). What can we infer from double dissociations? Cortex, 39, 1.
23. Düzel, E., Yonelinas, A. P., Mangun, G. R., Heinze, H. J., & Tulving, E. (1997). Event-related potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 94, 5973-5978.
24. Ecker, U. K., Zimmer, H. D., & Groh-Bordin, C. (2007a). Color and context: An ERP study on intrinsic and extrinsic feature binding in episodic memory. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1483-1501.
25. Ecker, U. K., Zimmer, H. D., & Groh-Bordin, C. (2007b). The influence of object and background color manipulations on the electrophysiological indices of recognition memory. Brain Research, 1185, 221-230.
26. Eichenbaum, H., Yonelinas, A. P., & Ranganath, C. (2007). The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 123-152.
27. Finnigan, S., Humphreys, M. S., Dennis, S., & Geffen, G. (2002). ERP "old/new" effects: Memory strength and decisional factor(s). Neuropsychologia, 40, 2288-2304.
28. Friedman, D., & Johnson, R., Jr. (2000). Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: A selective review. Microscopy Research and Technique, 51, 6-28.
29. Gallo, D. A. (2006). Associative illusions of memory: False memory research in DRM and related tasks. New York: Psychology Press.
30. Gallo, D. A., Cotel, S. C., Moore, C. D., & Schacter, D. L. (2007). Aging can spare recollection-based retrieval monitoring: The importance of event distinctiveness. Psychology and Aging, 22, 209-213.
31. Gallo, D. A., Weiss, J. A., & Schacter, D. L. (2004). Reducing false recognition with criterial recollection tests: Distinctiveness heuristic versus criterion shifts. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 473-493.
32. Geisser, S., & Greenhouse, S. W. (1958). An extension of Box's results on the use of the F distribution in multivariate analyses. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29, 885-891.
33. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468-484. (Pubitemid 13112654)
34. Groh-Bordin, C., Zimmer, H. D., & Ecker, U. K. (2006). Has the butcher on the bus dyed his hair? When color changes modulate ERP correlates of familiarity and recollection. Neuroimage, 32, 1879-1890.
35. Hamilton, M., & Geraci, L. (2006). The picture superiority effect in conceptual implicit memory: A conceptual distinctiveness hypothesis. American Journal of Psychology, 119, 1-20.
36. Hintzman, D. L., & Curran, T. (1994). Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 1-18.
37. Hirshman, E. (1995). Decision processes in recognition memory: Criterion shifts and the list-strength paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 302-313.
38. Hockley, W. E. (2008). The picture superiority effect in associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1351-1359.
39. Hornberger, M., Morcom, A. M., & Rugg, M. D. (2004). Neural correlates of retrieval orientation: Effects of study-test similarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1196-1210. (Pubitemid 39274447)
40. Jager, T., Mecklinger, A., & Kipp, K. H. (2006). Intraand inter-item associations doubly dissociate the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity and recollection. Neuron, 52, 535-545.
41. Junghöfer, M., Elbert, T., Tucker, D. M., & Braun, C. (1999). The polar average reference effect: A bias in estimating the head surface integral in EEG recording. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 1149-1155.
42. Kishiyama, M. M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2006). Stimulus novelty effects on recognition memory: Behavioral properties and neuroanatomical substrates. In R. R. Hunt & J. B. Worthen (Eds.), Distinctiveness and memory (pp. 381-404). New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Laeng, B., Overvoll, M., & Steinsvik, O. (2007). Remembering 1500 pictures: The right hemisphere remembers better than the left. Brain and Cognition, 63, 136-144.
44. Lucas, H. D., Voss, J. L., & Paller, K. A. (2010). Familiarity or conceptual priming? Good question! Comment on Stenberg, Hellman, Johansson, and Rosén (2009). Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 615-617.
45. Madigan, S. (1983). Picture memory. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Imagery, memory, and cognition: Essays in honor of Allan Paivio (pp. 65-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Marsolek, C. J., Squire, L. R., Kosslyn, S. M., & Lulenski, M. E. (1994). Form-specific explicit and implicit memory in the right cerebral hemisphere. Neuropsychology, 8, 588-597.
47. McBride, D. M., & Anne Dosher, B. (2002). A comparison of conscious and automatic memory processes for picture and word stimuli: A process dissociation analysis. Consciousness & Cognition, 11, 423-460.
48. McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 62, 203-208. (Pubitemid 15036868)
49. McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., III (1996). Exact and conceptual repetition dissociate conceptual memory tests: Problems for transfer appropriate processing theory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 57-71.
50. McElree, B., Dolan, P. O., & Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: A time-course analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 563-582.
51. Mecklinger, A. (2000). Interfacing mind and brain: A neurocognitive model of recognition memory. Psychophysiology, 37, 565-582.
52. Mecklinger, A. (2006). Electrophysiological measures of familiarity memory. Journal of Clinical EEG & Neuroscience, 37, 292-299.
53. Metcalfe, J., Funnell, M., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (1995). Right-hemisphere memory superiority: Studies of a split-brain patient. Psychological Science, 6, 157-164.
54. Mintzer, M. Z., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1999). The picture superiority effect: Support for the distinctiveness model. American Journal of Psychology, 112, 113-146.
55. Nelson, D. L., Reed, V. S., & Walling, J. R. (1976). Pictorial superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 25, 523-528.
56. Nyhus, E., & Curran, T. (2009). Semantic and perceptual effects on recognition memory: Evidence from ERP. Brain Research, 1283, 102-114.
57. Paivio, A. (1976). Imagery in recall and recognition. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recall and recognition. New York: Wiley.
58. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representation: A dual coding approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Paller, K. A., Voss, J. L., & Boehm, S. G. (2007). Validating neural correlates of familiarity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 243-250.
60. Picton, T. W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S. A., Johnson, R., Jr., et al. (2000). Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology, 37, 127-152.
61. Rajaram, S. (1996). Perceptual effects on remembering: Recollective processes in picture recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 365-377.
62. Reder, L. M., Donavos, D. K., & Erickson, M. A. (2002). Perceptual match effects in direct tests of memory: The role of contextual fan. Memory & Cognition, 30, 312-323.
63. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814.
64. Rugg, M. D., Allan, K., & Birch, C. S. (2000). Electrophysiological evidence for the modulation of retrieval orientation by depth of study processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 664-678.
65. Rugg, M. D., & Curran, T. (2007). Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 251-257.
66. Rugg, M. D., Schloerscheidt, A. M., & Mark, R. E. (1998). An electrophysiological comparison of two indices of recollection. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 47-69.
67. Schacter, D. L., Israel, L., & Racine, C. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 1-24.
68. Schacter, D. L., & Wiseman, A. L. (2006). Reducing memory errors: The distinctiveness heuristic. In R. R. Hunt & J. B. Worthen (Eds.), Distinctiveness and memory (pp. 89-107). New York: Oxford University Press.
69. Schloerscheidt, A. M., & Rugg, M. D. (2004). The impact of change in stimulus format on the electrophysiological indices of recognition. Neuropsychologia, 42, 451-466.
70. Senkfor, A. J., & Van Petten, C. (1998). Who said what? An event-related potential investigation of source and item memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1005-1025.
71. Smith, M. E. (1993). Neurophysiological manifestations of recollective experience during recognition memory judgments. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 1-13.
72. Snodgrass, J. G., & McClure, P. (1975). Studied storage and retrieval properties of pictures and words within a recognition memory paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1, 521-529.
73. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
74. Srinivasan, R., Nunez, P. L., Silberstein, R. B., Tucker, D. M., & Cadusch, P. J. (1996). Spatial sampling and filtering of EEG with spline-Laplacians to estimate cortical potentials. Brain Topography, 8, 355-366. (Pubitemid 26252696)
75. Stenberg, G., Hellman, J., Johansson, M., & Rosén, I. (2009). Familiarity or conceptual priming: Event-related potentials in name recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 447-460.
76. Stenberg, G., Johansson, M., Hellman, J., & Rosén, I. (2010). "Do you see yonder cloud?" - On priming concepts, a new test and a familiar outcome. Reply to Lucas et al.: "Familiarity or conceptual priming? Good question! Comment on Stenberg, Hellman, Johansson, and Rosén (2009)". Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 618-620.
77. Stenberg, G., Radeborg, K., & Hedman, L. R. (1995). The picture superiority effect in a cross-modality recognition task. Memory & Cognition, 23, 425-441.
78. Stretch, V., & Wixted, J. T. (1998). On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 1379-1396.
79. Szekely, A., Jacobsen, T., D'Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Andonova, E., Herron, D., et al. (2004). A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 247-250.
80. Trott, C. T., Friedman, D., Ritter, W., Fabiani, M., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1999). Episodic priming and memory for temporal source: Event-related potentials reveal age-related differences in prefrontal functioning. Psychology & Aging, 14, 390-413.
81. Vaidya, C. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2000). Picture superiority in conceptual memory: Dissociative effects of encoding and retrieval tasks. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1165-1172.
82. Vilberg, K. L., Moosavi, R. F., & Rugg, M. D. (2006). The relationship between electrophysiological correlates of recollection and amount of information retrieved. Brain Research, 1122, 161-170.
83. Weldon, M. S., & Coyote, K. C. (1996). Failure to find the picture superiority effect in implicit conceptual memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 670-686.
84. Weldon, M. S., & Roediger, H. L. (1987). Altering retrieval demands reverses the picture superiority effect. Memory & Cognition, 15, 269-280.
85. Weldon, M. S., Roediger, H. L., & Challis, B. H. (1989). The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect. Memory & Cognition, 17, 95-105.
86. Wilding, E. L. (2000). In what way does the parietal ERP old/new effect index recollection? International Journal of Psychophysiology, 35, 81-87.
87. Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1996). An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. Brain, 119, 889-905.
88. Wixted, J. T. (2007). Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 114, 152-176.
89. Woodruff, C. C., Hayama, H. R., & Rugg, M. D. (2006). Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity. Brain Research, 1100, 125-135.
90. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517.