ERP effects of change localization, change identification, and change blindness

NeuroReport

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 371-375

  Busch, Niko A ^a,b   Dürschmid, Stefan ^c   Herrmann, Christoph S ^c  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention; Awareness; Change detection; Change positivity; EEG; ERP; Selection negativity; Visual working memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CHANGE BLINDNESS; CHANGE THEORY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESSING; RECOGNITION; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77949484432     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283378379     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Fernandez-Duque D, Thornton IM. Change detection without awareness: Do explicit reports underestimate the representation of change in the visual system? Visual Cogn 2000; 7:323-344.
2. Rensink RA. Visual sensing without seeing. Psychol Sci 2004; 15:27-32.
3. Busch NA, Fründ I, Herrmann CS. Electrophysiological evidence for different types of change detection and change blindness. J Cogn Neurosci 2009 [Epub ahead of print].
4. Galpin A, Underwood G, Chapman P. Sensing without seeing in comparative visual search. Conscious Cogn 2008; 17:672-687.
5. Watanabe K. Differential effect of distractor timing on localizing versus identifying visual changes. Cognition 2003; 88:243-257.
6. Rossion B, Pourtois G. Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: the role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception 2004; 33:217-236.
7. Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 2004; 134:9-21.
8. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian J Stat 1979; 6:65-70.
9. Goodale MA, Milner AD. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 1992; 15:20-25.
10. Koivisto M, Revonsuo A. An ERP study of change detection, change blindness, and visual awareness. Psychophysiology 2003; 40:423-429.
11. Wilenius-Emet M, Revonsuo A, Ojanen V. An electrophysiological correlate of human visual awareness. Neurosci Lett 2004; 354:38-41.
12. Kimura M, Katayama J, Murohashi H. Neural correlates of pre-attentive and attentive processing of visual changes. Neuroreport 2005; 16:2061-2064.
13. Kimura M, Katayama J, Murohashi H. Effects of feature and spatial attention on visual change detection. Neuroreport 2008; 19:389-392.
14. Luck SJ, Hillyard SA. Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1994; 20:1000-1014.
15. Eimer M. The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996; 99:225-234.
16. Eimer M, Mazza V. Electrophysiological correlates of change detection. Psychophysiology 2005; 42:328-342.
17. Schankin A, Wascher E. Electrophysiological correlates of stimulus processing in change blindness. Exp Brain Res 2007; 183:95-105.
18. Heinze HJ, Luck SJ, Mangun GR, Hillyard SA. Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. I. Evidence for early selection. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990; 75:511-527.