Predicting protein-ATP binding sites from primary sequence through fusing bi-profile sampling of multi-view features

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Zhang, Ya Nan ^a   Yu, Dong Jun ^b   Li, Shu Sen ^a   Fan, Yong Xian ^a   Huang, Yan ^c   Shen, Hong Bin ^a  

^a Department of Automation   (China)

^b NANJING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF TECHNICAL PHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

Bi profile sampling; Cross validation; Position specific position matrix; Protein atp binding site prediction

Indexed keywords

ATP BINDING; BENCHMARK DATASETS; BINDING RESIDUES; BINDING SITE PREDICTIONS; CELL BIOLOGY; CROSS VALIDATION; CROSS-VALIDATION TESTS; DESCRIPTORS; FUNCTIONAL RESIDUES; LEAVE-ONE-OUT; MULTI-VIEWS; MULTIPLE SOURCE; NEGATIVE SAMPLES; POSITION MATRIX; PREDICTION PERFORMANCE; PRIMARY SEQUENCES; SECONDARY STRUCTURES; SOLVENT ACCESSIBILITY; STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; STRUCTURAL FEATURE; TRAINING DATA SETS; TRIPHOSPHATE;

BINDING SITES; CYTOLOGY; FORECASTING;

PROTEINS;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN DATABASE; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; PROTEINS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 84861592844     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-118     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Shapiro L, Harris T. Finding function through structural genomics. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2000, 11(1):31-35. 10.1016/S0958-1669(99)00064-6, 10679341.
2. Ofran Y, Punta M, Schneider R, Rost B. Beyond annotation transfer by homology: novel protein-function prediction methods to assist drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 2005, 10(21):1475-1482. 10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03621-4, 16243268.
3. Kurgan L, Cios K, Chen K. SCPRED: accurate prediction of protein structural class for sequences of twilight-zone similarity with predicting sequences. BMC Bioinforma 2008, 9:226.
4. Gromiha MM. Protein bioinformatics: from sequence to function 2010, Academic Press/Elsevier, Amsterdam; Boston.
5. Juncker AS, Jensen LJ, Pierleoni A, Bernsel A, Tress ML, Bork P, von Heijne G, Valencia A, Ouzounis CA, Casadio R, et al. Sequence-based feature prediction and annotation of proteins. Genome Biol 2009, 10(2):206. 10.1186/gb-2009-10-2-206, 2688272, 19226438.
6. Bergamini CM, Dondi A, Lanzara V, Squerzanti M, Cervellati C, Montin K, Mischiati C, Tasco G, Collighan R, Griffin M, et al. Thermodynamics of binding of regulatory ligands to tissue transglutaminase. Amino Acids 2010, 39(1):297-304. 10.1007/s00726-009-0442-5, 20033238.
7. Talavera D, Robertson DL, Lovell SC. Characterization of protein-protein interaction interfaces from a single species. PLoS One 2011, 6(6):e21053. 10.1371/journal.pone.0021053, 3124478, 21738603.
8. Bartoli L, Martelli PL, Rossi I, Fariselli P, Casadio R. The prediction of protein-protein interacting sites in genome-wide protein interaction networks: the test case of the human cell cycle. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2010, 11(7):601-608. 10.2174/138920310794109157, 20887257.
9. Zhao H, Yang Y, Zhou Y. Structure-based prediction of RNA-binding domains and RNA-binding sites and application to structural genomics targets. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39(8):3017-3025. 10.1093/nar/gkq1266, 3082898, 21183467.
10. Gromiha MM, Yabuki Y, Suresh MX, Thangakani AM, Suwa M, Fukui K. TMFunction: database for functional residues in membrane proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37(Database issue):D201-204. 2686444, 18842639.
11. Gromiha MM. Protein folding, stability and interactions. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2010, 11(7):497. 10.2174/138920310794109102, 20887266.
12. Chen K, Mizianty MJ, Kurgan L. Prediction and analysis of nucleotide-binding residues using sequence and sequence-derived structural descriptors. Bioinformatics 2012, 28(3):331-341. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr657, 22130595.
13. Firoz A, Malik A, Joplin KH, Ahmad Z, Jha V, Ahmad S. Residue propensities, discrimination and binding site prediction of adenine and guanine phosphates. BMC Biochem 2011, 12:20. 10.1186/1471-2091-12-20, 3113737, 21569447.
14. Glaser F, Pupko T, Paz I, Bell RE, Bechor-Shental D, Martz E, Ben-Tal N. ConSurf: identification of functional regions in proteins by surface-mapping of phylogenetic information. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(1):163-164. 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.1.163, 12499312.
15. Lichtarge O, Bourne HR, Cohen FE. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J Mol Biol 1996, 257(2):342-358. 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0167, 8609628.
16. Thornton JM, George RA, Spriggs RV, Bartlett GJ, Gutteridge A, MacArthur MW, Porter CT, Al-Lazikani B, Swindells MB. Effective function annotation through catalytic residue conservation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102(35):12299-12304. 10.1073/pnas.0504833102, 1178014, 16037208.
17. Yeates TO, Pellegrini M, Marcotte EM, Thompson MJ, Eisenberg D. Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: Protein phylogenetic profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999, 96(8):4285-4288. 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4285, 16324, 10200254.
18. Thibert B, Bredesen DE, del Rio G. Improved prediction of critical residues for protein function based on network and phylogenetic analyses. BMC Bioinforma 2005, 6:213.
19. Todd AE, Orengo CA, Thornton JM. Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective. J Mol Biol 2001, 307(4):1113-1143. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4513, 11286560.
20. Tian W, Skolnick J. How well is enzyme function conserved as a function of pairwise sequence identity?. J Mol Biol 2003, 333(4):863-882. 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.08.057, 14568541.
21. Ezkurdia I, Bartoli L, Fariselli P, Casadio R, Valencia A, Tress ML. Progress and challenges in predicting protein-protein interaction sites. Brief Bioinform 2009, 10(3):233-246.
22. de Vries SJ, Bonvin AM. Intramolecular surface contacts contain information about protein-protein interface regions. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(17):2094-2098. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl275, 16766554.
23. Nooren IM, Thornton JM. Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. J Mol Biol 2003, 325(5):991-1018. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01281-0, 12527304.
24. Moreira IS, Fernandes PA, Ramos MJ. Hot spots-a review of the protein-protein interface determinant amino-acid residues. Proteins 2007, 68(4):803-812. 10.1002/prot.21396, 17546660.
25. DeLano WL. Unraveling hot spots in binding interfaces: progress and challenges. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002, 12(1):14-20. 10.1016/S0959-440X(02)00283-X, 11839484.
26. Ma B, Elkayam T, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Protein-protein interactions: structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100(10):5772-5777. 10.1073/pnas.1030237100, 156276, 12730379.
27. Burgoyne NJ, Jackson RM. Predicting protein interaction sites: binding hot-spots in protein-protein and protein-ligand interfaces. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(11):1335-1342. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl079, 16522669.
28. Bartlett GJ, Porter CT, Borkakoti N, Thornton JM. Analysis of catalytic residues in enzyme active sites. J Mol Biol 2002, 324(1):105-121. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01036-7, 12421562.
29. Chea E, Livesay DR. How accurate and statistically robust are catalytic site predictions based on closeness centrality?. BMC Bioinforma 2007, 8:153.
30. Amitai G, Shemesh A, Sitbon E, Shklar M, Netanely D, Venger I, Pietrokovski S. Network analysis of protein structures identifies functional residues. J Mol Biol 2004, 344(4):1135-1146. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.10.055, 15544817.
31. Bate P, Warwicker J. Enzyme/non-enzyme discrimination and prediction of enzyme active site location using charge-based methods. J Mol Biol 2004, 340(2):263-276. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.04.070, 15201051.
32. Ben-Shimon A, Eisenstein M. Looking at enzymes from the inside out: the proximity of catalytic residues to the molecular centroid can be used for detection of active sites and enzyme-ligand interfaces. J Mol Biol 2005, 351(2):309-326. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.06.047, 16019028.
33. Zhang H, Zhang T, Chen K, Kedarisetti KD, Mizianty MJ, Bao Q, Stach W, Kurgan L. Critical assessment of high-throughput standalone methods for secondary structure prediction. Brief Bioinform 2011, 12(6):672-688. 10.1093/bib/bbq088, 21252072.
34. Gromiha MM, Yokota K, Fukui K. Sequence and structural analysis of binding site residues in protein-protein complexes. Int J Biol Macromol 2010, 46(2):187-192. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2009.11.009, 20026105.
35. Volkamer A, Griewel A, Grombacher T, Rarey M. Analyzing the topology of active sites: on the prediction of pockets and subpockets. J Chem Inf Model 2010, 50(11):2041-2052. 10.1021/ci100241y, 20945875.
36. Sankararaman S, Sha F, Kirsch JF, Jordan MI, Sjolander K. Active site prediction using evolutionary and structural information. Bioinformatics 2010, 26(5):617-624. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq008, 2828116, 20080507.
37. Hirokawa N, Takemura R. Biochemical and molecular characterization of diseases linked to motor proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 2003, 28(10):558-565. 10.1016/j.tibs.2003.08.006, 14559185.
38. Bustamante C, Chemla YR, Forde NR, Izhaky D. Mechanical processes in biochemistry. Annu Rev Biochem 2004, 73:705-748. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161542, 15189157.
39. Chauhan JS, Mishra NK, Raghava GP. Identification of ATP binding residues of a protein from its primary sequence. BMC Bioinforma 2009, 10:434.
40. Chen Ke MJM, Kurgan L. ATPsite: sequence-based prediction of ATP-binding residues. Proteome Science 2011, 9(Suppl 1):S4. 10.1186/1477-5956-9-S1-S4, 3289083, 22165846.
41. Shao J, Xu D, Tsai SN, Wang Y, Ngai SM. Computational identification of protein methylation sites through bi-profile Bayes feature extraction. PLoS One 2009, 4(3):e4920. 10.1371/journal.pone.0004920, 2654709, 19290060.
42. Bauer RA, Gunther S, Jansen D, Heeger C, Thaben PF, Preissner R. SuperSite: dictionary of metabolite and drug binding sites in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37(Database issue):D195-200. 2686477, 18842629.
43. Li W, Godzik A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(13):1658-1659. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158, 16731699.
44. Chen K, Mizianty MJ, Kurgan L. ATPsite: sequence-based prediction of ATP-binding residues. Proteome Sci 2011, 9(Suppl 1):S4. 10.1186/1477-5956-9-S1-S4, 3289083, 22165846.
45. Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 1999, 292(2):195-202. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3091, 10493868.
46. Ward JJ, Sodhi JS, McGuffin LJ, Buxton BF, Jones DT. Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. J Mol Biol 2004, 337(3):635-645. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.02.002, 15019783.
47. Cheng J, Randall AZ, Sweredoski MJ, Baldi P. SCRATCH: a protein structure and structural feature prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33(Web Server issue):W72-76. 1160157, 15980571.
48. Song J, Tan H, Shen H, Mahmood K, Boyd SE, Webb GI, Akutsu T, Whisstock JC. Cascleave: towards more accurate prediction of caspase substrate cleavage sites. Bioinformatics 2010, 26(6):752-760. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq043, 20130033.
49. Smialowski P, Schmidt T, Cox J, Kirschner A, Frishman D. Will my protein crystallize? A sequence-based predictor. Proteins 2006, 62(2):343-355.
50. Smialowski P, Martin-Galiano AJ, Mikolajka A, Girschick T, Holak TA, Frishman D. Protein solubility: sequence based prediction and experimental verification. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(19):2536-2542. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl623, 17150993.
51. Song J, Tan H, Takemoto K, Akutsu T. HSEpred: predict half-sphere exposure from protein sequences. Bioinformatics 2008, 24(13):1489-1497. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn222, 18467349.
52. Zhang H, Zhang T, Chen K, Shen S, Ruan J, Kurgan L. Sequence based residue depth prediction using evolutionary information and predicted secondary structure. BMC Bioinforma 2008, 9:388.
53. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines Chang CC, Lin CJ, Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm; 2001.
54. Vapnik VN. The nature of statistical learning theory 2000, New York: Springer, 2.
55. Haibo H, Garcia EA. Learning from Imbalanced Data. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on 2009, 21(9):1263-1284.
56. Jo T, Japkowicz N. Class Imbalances versus Small Disjuncts. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 2004, 6(1):40-49.
57. Tompa P. Unstructural biology coming of age. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2011, 21(3):419-425. 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.03.012, 21514142.
58. Dosztanyi Z, Tompa P. Prediction of protein disorder. Methods Mol Biol 2008, 426:103-115. 10.1007/978-1-60327-058-8_6, 18542859.
59. Hegyi H, Tompa P. Intrinsically disordered proteins display no preference for chaperone binding in vivo. PLoS Comput Biol 2008, 4(3):e1000017. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000017, 2265518, 18369417.
60. Faraggi E, Xue B, Zhou Y. Improving the prediction accuracy of residue solvent accessibility and real-value backbone torsion angles of proteins by guided-learning through a two-layer neural network. Proteins 2009, 74(4):847-856. 10.1002/prot.22193, 2635924, 18704931.