Addressing the wicked problem of quality in higher education: Theoretical approaches and implications

Higher Education Research and Development

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 285-297

  Krause, Kerri Lee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

quality; sensitizing concepts; theory building; wicked problems

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861549517     PISSN: 07294360     EISSN: 14698366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2011.634381     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Ackoff, R. 1999. Ackoff's best: His classic writings on management, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
2. Anderson, G. 2006. Assuring quality/resisting quality assurance: Academics' responses to 'quality' in some Australian universities. Quality in Higher Education, 12(2): 161-173.
3. Baird, J. 2008. Whose quality conventions? The application of convention theory in higher education. Tertiary Education and Management. 14(1): 67-79.
4. Ball, C. 1985. "What the hell is quality?". In Fitness for purpose: Essays in higher education, Edited by: Ball, C. 96-102. Guildford, UK: The Society for Research in Higher Education.
5. Ball, S. J. 1995. Intellectuals or technicians? The urgent role of theory in educational studies. British Journal of Educational Studies, 43: 255-271.
6. Bensimon, E. M. 1995. Total Quality Management in the academy: A rebellious reading. Havard Educational Review, 65(4): 593-611.
7. Blackman, T. 2006. Placing health: Neighbourhood renewal, health improvement and complexity, Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
8. Blackman, T., Hunter, D., Marks, L., Harrington, B., Elliott, E., Williams, G., Greene, A. and Mckee, L. 2010. Wicked comparisons: Reflections on cross-national research about health inequalities in the UK. Evaluation, 16(1): 43-57.
9. Blackmore, J. 2009. Academic pedagogies, quality logics and performative universities: Evaluating teaching and what students want. Studies in Higher Education, 34(8): 857-872.
10. Blumer, H. 1931. Science without concepts. American Journal of Sociology, 36(4): 515-533.
11. Blumer, H. 1954. What is wrong with social theory?. American Sociological Review, 19(1): 3-10.
12. Bore, A. and Wright, N. 2009. The wicked and complex in education: Developing a transdisciplinary perspective for policy formulation, implementation and professional practice. Journal of Education for Teaching, 35(3): 241-256.
13. Boyle, P. and Bowden, J. A. 1997. Educational quality assurance in universities: An enhanced model. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(2): 111-121.
14. Briggs, L. 2007. Tackling wicked problems: A public policy perspective, Canberra: Public Service Commission. Retrieved May 27, 2011, from http://www.apsc.gov.au/publications07/wickedproblems.htm
15. Charmaz, K. 2003. "Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods". In Strategies for qualitative inquiry, 2, Edited by: Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. 249-291. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Christie, M. and Stehlik, T. July 2002. The defining qualities of good assessment July, Paper presented at the Higher Education and Research Society of Australasia (HERDSA) Conference: Quality Conversations. Perth, Australia
17. Churchman, C. W. 1967. Wicked problems (guest editorial). Management Science, 14(4): B141-142.
18. Conklin, J. 2006. Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems, Chichester, UK: Wiley.
19. Cowen, R. 1996. Performativity: Postmodernity and the university. Comparative Education, 32(2): 245-257.
20. D'Andrea, V. 2007. "Improving teaching and learning in higher education: Can learning theory add value to quality reviews?". In Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation, Edited by: Westerheijden, D., Stensaker, B. and Rosa, M. J. 209-223. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
21. D'Andrea, V. and Gosling, D. 2005. Improving teaching and learning in higher education: A whole institution approach, Maidenhead, UK: SRHE & Open University Press.
22. Eisenhardt, K. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532-550.
23. Eisenhardt, K. and Graebner, M. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 25-32.
24. Harvey, L. (2002). The end of quality? Quality in Higher Education, 8(1), 5-22.
25. Harvey, L. and Green, D. 1993. Defining quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1): 9-34.
26. Harvey, L. and Williams, J. 2010. Editorial: Fifteen years of quality in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 16(1): 3-36.
27. Huber, J. 1973. Symbolic interaction as a pragmatic perspective: The bias of emergent theory. American Sociological Review, 38(2): 274-284.
28. Kelder, J. 2009. Investigating the role and impact of an information system in accrediting and delivering breastscreening services in Tasmania: A nexus between accreditation and practice (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tasmania, 2009). Retrieved April 22, 2011, from prints.utas.edu.au/8971/
29. Klijn, E. and Koppenjan, J. 2006. Changing institutional features of networks. Public Management Review, 8(1): 141-160.
30. Knight, P. and Trowler, P. 2000. Department-level cultures and the improvement of learning and teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1): 69-83.
31. Krause, K. 2009. "Interpreting changing academic roles and identities in higher education". In International handbook of higher education, Edited by: Tight, M. 413-426. London: Routledge.
32. Krause, K. 2011. "Using student survey data to shape academic priorities and approaches". In The effectiveness of academic development, Edited by: Stefani, L. 59-72. London: Routledge.
33. Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S. and Auld, G. February 2007. Playing it forward: Path dependency, progressive incrementalism, and the 'super wicked' problem of global climate change February, Article presented at the International Studies Association Convention, Chicago
34. Massy, W. 2003. Honoring the trust: Quality and cost containment in higher education, Bolton, MA: Anker.
35. Newton, J. 2002. Views from below: Academics coping with quality. Quality in Higher Education, 8(1): 39-61.
36. Newton, J. 2010. A tale of two 'qualitys': Reflections on the quality revolution in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 16(1): 51-53.
37. Padgett, D. K. 2004. "Coming of age: Theoretical thinking, social responsibility and a global perspective in qualitative research". In The qualitative research experience, Edited by: Padgett, D. K. 297-315. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
38. Pfeffer, J. 1982. Organisations and organisation theory, Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
39. Rittel, H. W.J. and Webber, M. M. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Science, 4(2): 155-169.
40. Roberts, N. 2000. Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution. International Public Management Review, 1(1): 1-19.
41. Rogers, K. 2006. The real river management challenge: Integrating scientists, stakeholders and service agencies. River Research and Applications, 22(2): 269-280.
42. Rosa, M. and Amaral, A. 2007. "A self-assessment of higher education institutions from the perspective of the EFQM Excellence Model". In Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation, Edited by: Westerheijden, D., Stensaker, B. and Rosa, M. J. 181-207. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
43. Seddon, J. 2008. Systems thinking in the public sector: The failure of the reform regime and a manifesto for a better way, Axminster, UK: Triarchy Press.
44. Senge, P. 2006. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organisation, New York: Doubleday.
45. Senge, P. M. 1999. The dance of change: The challenges of sustaining momentum in learning organizations, New York: Currency/Doubleday.
46. Shum, S. J.B. 2003. "The roots of computer supported argument visualization". In Visualizing argumentation: Tools for collaborative and educational sense-making, Edited by: Kirschner, P., Shum, S. J.B and Carr, C. S. 3-24. London: Springer-Verlag.
47. Srikanthan, G. and Dalrymple, J. 2002. Developing a holistic model for quality in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 8(3): 215-224.
48. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49. Trowler, P. 2012. Wicked issues in situating theory in close-up research. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(3): 273-284.
50. Van Bueren, E., Klijn, E. and Koppenjan, J. 2003. Dealing with wicked problems in networks: Analysing an environmental debate from a network perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2): 193-212.
51. van den Hoonaard, W. C. 1997. Working with sensitising concepts: Analytical field research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52. Van der Knapp, P. 2004. Theory-based evaluation and learning: Possibilities and challenges. Evaluation, 10(1): 16-34.
53. Vidovich, L. 2001. That chameleon 'quality: The multiple and contradictory discourses of 'quality' policy in Australian higher education. Discourse, 22(2): 249-261.
54. Watson, D. 2000. Managing in higher education: The 'wicked issues'. Higher Education Quarterly, 54(1): 5-21.