Genetic variation in functional traits influences arthropod community composition in aspen (populus tremula L.)

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Robinson, Kathryn M ^a   Ingvarsson, Pär K ^a   Jansson, Stefan ^a   Albrectsen, Benedicte R ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTHOCYANIN; TANNIN DERIVATIVE;

ARTHROPOD COMMUNITY; ARTICLE; ASPEN; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL TRAIT; CANOPY; CLONE; COEVOLUTION; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; FOLIVORE; FUNCTIONAL TRAIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; GROWTH RATE; HERBIVORY; HERITABILITY; LEAF MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PETIOLE; PHYTOCHEMISTRY; PLANT DEFENSE; PLANT GROWTH; POPULATION ABUNDANCE; POPULUS TREMULA; SPECIES RICHNESS; SWEDEN; WILD SPECIES;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; ECOSYSTEM; GENETIC VARIATION; HERBIVORY; PHENOTYPE; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT STEMS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULUS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SWEDEN; TREES;

ARTHROPODA; POPULUS TREMULA;

EID: 84861475227     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037679     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Kuusinen M, (1996) Epiphyte flora and diversity on basal trunks of six old-growth forest tree species in southern and middle boreal Finland. Lichenologist 28: 443-463.
2. Hedenås H, Blomberg P, Ericson L, (2007) Significance of old aspen (Populus tremula) trees for the occurrence of lichen photobionts. Biological Conservation 135: 380-387.
3. Suominen O, Edenius L, Ericsson G, Resco de Dios V, (2003) Gastropod diversity in aspen stands in coastal northern Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management 175: 403-412.
4. Myking T, Bøhler F, Austrheim G, Solberg EJ, (2011) Life history strategies of aspen (Populus tremula L.) and browsing effects: a literature review. Forestry 84: 61-71.
5. Kouki J, Arnold K, Martikainen P, (2004) Long-term persistence of aspen - a key host for many threatened species - is endangered in old-growth conservation areas in Finland. Journal for Nature Conservation 12: 41-52.
6. Gustafsson L, Kouki J, Sverdrup-Thygeson A, (2010) Tree retention as a conservation measure in clear-cut forests of northern Europe: a review of ecological consequences. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 25: 295-308.
7. Mitton JB, Grant MC, (1996) Genetic variation and the natural history of quaking aspen. BioScience 46: 25-31.
8. Jelinski DE, Cheliak WM, (1992) Genetic diversity and spatial subdivision of Populus tremuloides (Salicaceae) in a heterogeneous landscape. American Journal of Botany 79: 728-736.
9. Lindroth RL, Hwang S-Y, (1996) Clonal variation in foliar chemistry of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 24: 357-364.
10. Mock KE, Rowe CA, Hooten MB, Dewoody J, Hipkins VD, (2008) Clonal dynamics in western North American aspen (Populus tremuloides). Molecular Ecology 17: 4827-4844.
11. Kanaga MK, Ryel RJ, Mock KE, Pfrender ME, (2008) Quantitative-genetic variation in morphological and physiological traits within a quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) population. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38: 1690-1694.
12. St Clair SB, Mock KE, LaMalfa EM, Campbell RB, Ryel RJ, (2010) Genetic contributions to phenotypic variation in physiology, growth, and vigor of Western Aspen (Populus tremuloides) clones. Forest Science 56: 222-230.
13. Smith EA, Collette SB, Boynton TA, Lillrose T, Stevens MR, et al. (2011) Developmental contributions to phenotypic variation in functional leaf traits within quaking aspen clones. Tree Physiology 31: 68-77.
14. Suvanto LI, Latva-Karjanmaa TB, (2005) Clone identification and clonal structure of the European aspen (Populus tremula). Molecular Ecology 14: 2851-2860.
15. De Carvalho D, Ingvarsson PK, Joseph J, Suter L, Sedivy C, Macaya-Sanz D, et al. (2010) Admixture facilitates adaptation from standing variation in the European aspen (Populus tremula L.), a widespread forest tree. Molecular Ecology 19: 1638-1650.
16. Hall D, Luquez V, Garcia VM, St Onge KR, Jansson S, et al. (2007) Adaptive population differentiation in phenology across a latitudinal gradient in European aspen (Populus tremula, L.): a comparison of neutral markers, candidate genes and phenotypic traits. Evolution 61: 2849-2860.
17. Luquez V, Hall D, Albrectsen BR, Karlsson J, Ingvarsson P, et al. (2008) Natural phenological variation in aspen (Populus tremula): the SwAsp collection. Tree Genetics and Genomes 4: 279-292.
18. Bylesjö M, Segura V, Soolanayakanahally RY, Rae AM, Trygg J, et al. (2008) LAMINA: a tool for rapid quantification of leaf size and shape parameters. BMC Plant Biology 8: 82.
19. Kleeman F, von Fragstein M, Vornam B, Müller A, Leuschner C, et al. (2011) Relating genetic variation of ecologically important tree traits to associated organisms in full-sib aspen families. European Journal of Forest Research 130: 707-716.
20. Abreu IN, Ahnlund M, Moritz T, Albrectsen BR, (2011) UHPLC-ESI/TOFMS Determination of salicylate-like phenolic gycosides in Populus tremula leaves. Journal of Chemical Ecology 37: 857-70.
21. Philippe RN, Bohlmann J, (2007) Poplar defense against herbivores. Canadian Journal of Botany 85: 1111-1126.
22. Antonovics J, (1992) Towards community genetics. In: Fritz RS, Simms EL, editors. Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: Ecology, evolution and resistance Chicago University of Chicago Press.
23. Whitham TG, Young WP, Martinsen GD, Gehring CA, Schweizer JA, et al. (2003) Community and ecosystem genetics: a consequence of the extended phenotype. Ecology 84: 559-573.
24. Dungey HS, Potts BM, Whitham TG, Li H-F, (2000) Plant genetics affects arthropod community richness and composition: evidence from a synthetic eucalypt hybrid population. Evolution 54: 1938-1946.
25. Hochwender CG, Fritz RS, (2004) Plant genetic differences influence community structure: evidence from a hybrid willow system. Oecologia 138: 547-557.
26. Tovar-Sanchez E, Oyama K, (2006) Community structure of canopy arthropods associated to Quercus crassifolia×Quercus crassipes complex. Oikos 112: 370-381.
27. Nakamura M, Asanuma M, Hiura T, (2010) Differential effects of host plant hybridization on herbivore community structure and grazing pressure on forest canopies. Oikos 119: 1445-1452.
28. Johnson MT, Agrawal AA, (2005) Plant genotype and environment interact to shape a diverse arthropod community on evening primrose (Oenothera biennis). Ecology 86: 874-885.
29. Crawford KM, Crutsinger GM, Sanders NJ, (2007) Genotypic diversity mediates the distribution of an ecosystem engineer. Ecology 88: 2114-2120.
30. Gols R, Wagenaar R, Bukovinszky T, Van Dam NM, Dicke M, et al. (2008) Genetic variation in defense chemistry in wild cabbages affects herbivores and their endoparasitoids. Ecology 89: 1616-1626.
31. Barbour RC, O'Reilly-Wapstra JM, DeLittle DW, Jordan GJ, Steane DA, et al. (2009) A geographic mosaic of genetic variation within a foundation tree species and its community-level consequences. Ecology 90: 1762-1772.
32. Utsumi S, Ohgushi, T, (2009) Community-wide impacts of herbivore-induced plant regrowth on arthropods in a multi-willow species system. Oikos 188: 1805-1815.
33. Keith AR, Bailey JK, Whitham, (2010) A genetic basis to community repeatability and stability. Ecology 91: 3398-3406.
34. Stevens MT, Kruger EL, Lindroth RL, (2008) Variation in tolerance to herbivory is mediated by differences in biomass allocation in aspen. Functional Ecology 22: 40-47.
35. Kearsley MJ, Whitham TG, (1997) The developmental stream of cottonwoods affects ramet growth and resistance to galling aphids. Ecology 79: 178-191.
36. Waltz AM, Whitham TG, (1997) Plant development affects arthropod communities: opposing impacts of species removal. Ecology 78: 2133-2144.
37. Albrectsen BR, Gardfjell H, Orians CM, Murray B, Fritz RS, (2004) Slugs, willow seedlings and nutrient fertilization: intrinsic vigor inversely affects palatability. Oikos 105: 268-278.
38. Boege K, (2005) Herbivore attack in Casearia nitida influenced by plant ontogenetic variation in foliage quality and plant architecture. Oecologia 143: 117-125.
39. Holeski LM, Kearsley MJC, Whitham TG, (2009) Separating ontogenetic and environmental determination of resistance to herbivory in cottonwood. Ecology 90: 2969-2973.
40. Rudgers JA, Whitney KD, (2006) Interactions between insect herbivores and a plant architectural dimorphism. Journal of Ecology 94: 1249-1260.
41. Marques ESD, Price PW, Cobb NS, (2000) Resource abundance and insect herbivore diversity on woody fabaceous desert plants. Environmental Entomology 29: 696-703.
42. Yarnes CT, Boecklen WJ, (2005) Abiotic factors promote plant heterogeneity and influence herbivore performance and mortality in Gambel's oak (Quercus gambelii). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 114: 87-95.
43. Auerbach M, Alberts JD, (1992) Occurrence and performance of the aspen blotch miner, Phyllonorycter salicifoliella, on three host-tree species. Oecologia 89: 1-9.
44. Osier TL, Hwang SY, Lindroth RL, (2000) Effects of phytochemical variation in quaking aspen Populus tremuloides clones on gypsy moth Lymantria dispar performance in the field and laboratory. Ecological Entomology 25: 197-207.
45. Peacock L, Lewis M, Powers S, (2001) Volatile Compounds from Salix spp. Varieties Differing in Susceptibility to Three Willow Beetle Species. Journal of Chemical Ecology 27: 1943-1951.
46. Hanley M, Lamont B, Fairbanks M, Rafferty C, (2007) Plant structural traits and their role in anti-herbivore defence. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 8: 157-178.
47. Stiling P, Bowdish TI, (2000) Direct and indirect effects of plant clone and local environment on herbivore abundance. Ecology 81: 281-285.
48. Valkama E, Koricheva J, Salminen J-P, Helander M, Saloniemi I, et al. (2005) Leaf surface traits: overlooked determinants of birch resistance to herbivores and foliar micro-fungi? Trees- Structure and Function 19: 191-197.
49. Bailey JK, Wooley SC, Lindroth RL, Whitham TG, (2006) Importance of species interactions to community heritability: a genetic basis to trophic-level interactions. Ecology Letters 9: 78-85.
50. Andrew R, Wallis I, Harwood C, Henson M, Foley W, (2007) Heritable variation in the foliar secondary metabolite sideroxylonal in Eucalyptus confers cross-resistance to herbivores. Oecologia 153: 891-901.
51. Schweitzer JA, Bailey JK, Rehill BJ, Martinsen GD, Hart SC, et al. (2004) Genetically based trait in a dominant tree affects ecosystem processes. Ecology Letters 7: 127-134.
52. Pasteels JM, Rowell-Rahier M, Braekman JC, Dupont A, (1983) Salicin from host plant as precursor of salicylaldehyde in defensive secretion of Chrysomeline larvae. Physiological Entomology 8: 307-314.
53. Rowell-Rahier M, (1984) The presence or absence of phenolglycosides in Salix (Salicaceae) leaves and the level of dietary specialisation of some of their herbivorous insects. Oecologia 62: 26-30.
54. Feeny P, (1976) Plant Apparency and Chemical Defense. In: Wallace JW, Nansel RL, editors. Biological Interactions Between Plants and Insects. Recent Advances in Phytochemistry, Vol 10 New York Plenum Press.
55. Rhoades DF, Coates RG, (1976) Toward a general theory of plant antiherbivore chemistry. In: Wallace JW, Mansell RL, editors. Recent Advances in Phytochemistry, Volume 10 New York Plenum Press.
56. Bryant JP, Chapin FS, Klein DR, (1983) Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40: 357-368.
57. Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS, (1985) Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230: 895-899.
58. Price PW, (1991) The plant vigor hypothesis and herbivore attack. Oikos 62: 244-251.
59. Herms DA, Mattson WJ, (1992) The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Quarterly Review of Biology 67: 283-335.
60. Jones CG, Hartley SE, (1999) A Protein Competition Model of Phenolic Allocation. Oikos 86: 27-44.
61. Agrawal AA, (2007) Macroevolution of plant defense strategies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22: 103-109.
62. Carmona D, Lajeunesse MJ, Johnson MT, (2011) Plant traits that predict resistance to herbivores. Functional Ecology 25: 358-367.
63. Turesson G, (1922) The genotypical response of the plant species to the habitat. Hereditas 3: 211-350.
64. Morgenstern EK, (1996) Geographic Variation in Forest Trees Vancouver UBC Press.
65. Albrectsen BR, Witzell J, Robinson KM, Wulff S, Luquez VMC, et al. (2010) Large scale geographic clines of parasite damage to Populus tremula L. Ecography 33: 483-493.
66. Hemming JDC, Lindroth RL, (1995) Intraspecific variation in aspen phytochemistry: effects on performance of gypsy moths and forest tent caterpillars. Oecologia 103: 79-88.
67. Smith DS, Bailey JK, Shuster SM, Whitham TG, (2010) A geographic mosaic of trophic interactions and selection: trees, aphids and birds. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24: 422-429.
68. Wimp GM, Wooley S, Bangert RK, Young WP, Martinsen GD, et al. (2007) Plant genetics predicts intra-annual variation in phytochemistry and arthropod community structure. Molecular Ecology 16: 5057-5069.
69. Delaplanque A, eds. (1998) Les insects associés aux peupliers Brussels Éditions Memor.
70. Coulianos C, Holmåsen I, (1991) Galler: En fälthandbok om gallbildningar på vilda och odlade växter Stockholm Interpublishing.
71. Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ, (2004) Image Processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International 11: 36-42.
72. Ossipova S, Ossipov V, Haukioja E, Loponen J, Pihlaja K, (2001) Proanthocyanidins of mountain birch leaves: quantification and properties. Phytochemical Analysis 12: 128-133.
73. R Development Core Team (2006) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org.
74. Hadfield J, (2010) MCMC methods for Multi-response Generalised Linear Mixed Models: The MCMCglmm R Package. Journal of Statistical Software 33: 1-22.
75. Lynch M, Walsh B, (1997) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits Sunderland Sinauer Associates Inc.
76. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, et al. (2011) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0-2.http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
77. Anderson MJ, (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26: 32-46.
78. López-de-Heredia U, Sierra-de-Grado R, Pando V, Cristóbal MD, Martínez-Zurimendi PMartínTA, (2004) Comparison of isozyme and morphological markers to assess the within population variation in small populations of European aspen (Populus tremula L.) in Spain. Silvae Genetica 53: 227-233.
79. Barnes BV, (1969) Natural Variation and Delineation of Clones of Populus tremuloides and P. grandidentata in Northern Lower Michigan. Silvae Genetica 18: 130-142.
80. Wu RL, Bradshaw HD, Stettler RF, (1997) Molecular genetics of growth and development in Populus (Salicaceae). V. Mapping quantitative trait loci affecting leaf variation. American Journal of Botany 84: 143-153.
81. Marron N, Dillen SY, Ceulemans R, (2007) Evaluation of leaf traits for indirect selection of high yielding poplar hybrids. Environmental and Experimental Botany 61: 103-116.
82. Wu RL, Stettler RF, (1994) Quantitative genetics of growth and development in Populus. I. A three-generation comparison of tree architecture during the first 2 years of growth. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89: 1046-1054.
83. Frewen BE, Chen THH, Howe GT, Davis J, Rohde A, et al. (2000) Quantitative trait loci and candidate gene mapping of bud set and bud flush in Populus. Genetics 154: 837-845.
84. Rae AM, Robinson KM, Street NR, Taylor G, (2004) Structural, morphological and biochemical traits linked to fast growth in short-rotation coppice poplar for biomass. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34: 1488-1498.
85. Strong DR, Lawton JH, Southwood TRE, (1984) Insects on plants: community patterns and mechanisms Oxford Blackwell.
86. Fukui A, (2001) Indirect interactions mediated by leaf shelters in animal-plant communities. Population Ecology 43: 31-40.
87. Peeters PJ, (2002) Correlations between leaf structural traits and the densities of herbivorous insect guilds. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 77: 43-65.
88. Chang SX, Robison DJ, (2003) Nondestructive and rapid estimation of hardwood foliar nitrogen status using the SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter. Forest Ecology and Management 181: 331-338.
89. Donaldson JR, Lindroth RL, (2007) Genetics, environment, and their interaction determine the efficacy of chemical defense in trembling aspen. Ecology 88: 729-739.
90. Winkel-Shirley B, (2001) Flavonoid biosynthesis. A colorful model for genetics, biochemistry, cell biology, and biotechnology. Plant Physiology 126: 485-493.
91. Tsai C-J, Harding SA, Tschaplinski TJ, Lindroth RL, Yuan Y, (2006) Genome-wide analysis of the structural genes regulating defense phenylpropanoid metabolism in Populus. New Phytologist 172: 47-62.
92. Chen F, Liu C-J, Tschaplinski TJ, Zhao N, (2009) Genomics of Secondary Metabolism in Populus: Interactions with Biotic and Abiotic Environments. Critical Reviews in Plant Science 28: 375-392.
93. Donaldson JR, Lindroth RL, (2007) Genetics, environment, and their interaction determine the efficacy of chemical defense in trembling aspen. Ecology 88: 729-739.
94. Campos RI, Vasconcelos HL, Ribeiro SP, Neves FS, Soares JP, (2006) Relationship between tree size and insect assemblages associated with Anadenanthera macrocarpa. Ecography 29: 442-450.
95. Santos JC, Fernandes GW, (2010) Mediation of herbivore attack and induced resistance by plant vigor and ontogeny. Acta Oecologica 36: 617-625.
96. Donaldson JR, Stevens MT, Barnhill HR, Lindroth RL, (2006) Age-Related shifts in leaf chemistry of clonal aspen (Populus tremuloides). Journal of Chemical Ecology 32: 1415-1429.
97. Barton KE, Koricheva J, (2010) The ontogeny of plant defense and herbivory: characterising general patterns using meta-analysis. American Naturalist 175: 481-493.
98. Boege K, Marquis RJ, (2005) Facing herbivory as you grow up: the ontogeny of resistance in plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20: 441-448.