Effects of phytochemical variation in quaking aspen Populus tremuloides clones on gypsy moth Lymantria dispar performance in the field and laboratory

Ecological Entomology

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 197-207

  Osier, Tod L ^a   Hwang, Shaw Y ^b   Lindroth, Richard L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE OF PLANT AND MICROBIAL BIOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Bottom up effects; Clonal growth habit; Intraspecific variation; Lymantria dispar; Phenolic glycosides; Plant insect interactions; Populus tremuloides

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL MODEL; CLONE; FERTILITY; FOOD QUALITY; GROWTH; HERBIVORE; LARVA; NITROGEN; PHENOLIC GLYCOSIDE; PHYTOCHEMISTRY; TANNIN;

CLONE; FECUNDITY; GROWTH; PHYTOCHEMISTRY; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION;

LEPIDOPTERA; LYMANTRIA DISPAR; LYMANTRIIDAE; POPULUS TREMULOIDES;

EID: 0034028511     PISSN: 03076946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2000.00245.x     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. 2 and light on tree phytochemistry and insect performance. Oikos, in press.
2. Ayres, M.P., Clausen, T.P., MacLean, S.F., Jr, Redman, A.M. & Reichardt, P.B. (1997) Diversity of structure and antiherbivore activity in condensed tannins. Ecology, 78, 1696-1712.
3. Barnes, B.V. (1966) The clonal growth habit of American aspens. Ecology, 47, 439-4147.
4. Barnes, B.V. (1969) Natural variation and delineation of clones of Populus tremuloides and P. grandidentata in Northern Lower Michigan. Silvae Genetica, 18, 130-142.
5. Barnes, B.V. & Han, F.Q. (1993) Phenotypic variation of Chinese aspens and their relationships to similar taxa in Europe and North America. Canadian Journal of Botany, 71, 799-815.
6. Berenbaum, M.R. (1995) The chemistry of defense - theory and practice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 92, 2-8.
7. Bernays, E.A. & Chapman, R.F. (1994). Host-plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects. Chapman & Hall, New York.
8. Bingman, B.R. & Hart, E.R. (1993) Clonal and leaf age variation in Populus phenolic glycosides: implications for host selection by Chrysomela scripta (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environmental Entomology, 22, 397-403.
9. Bowers, M.D. & Stamp, N.E. (1992) Chemical variation within and between individuals of Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 18, 985-995.
10. Bryant, J.P., Chapin, F.S., III & Klein, D.R. (1983) Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos, 40, 357-368.
11. Bryant, J.P., Clausen, T.P., Reichardt, P.B., McCarthy, M.C. & Werner, R.A. (1987) Effect of nitrogen-fertilization upon the secondary chemistry and nutritional-value of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx) leaves for the large aspen tortrix (Choristoneura conflictana Walker). Oecologia, 13, 513-517.
12. Dickmann, D.I. & Stuart, K.W. (1983) The Culture of Poplars in Eastern North America. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
13. Erlich, P.R. & Raven, P.H. (1964) Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution, 18, 586-608.
14. Hagerman, A.E. & Butler, L.G. (1980) Condensed tannin purification and characterization of tannin-associated proteins. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 28, 947-952.
15. Hemming, J.D.C. & Lindroth, R.L. (1995) Intraspecific variation in aspen phytochemistry: effects on performance of gypsy moths and forest tent caterpillars. Oecologia, 103, 79-88.
16. Hemming, J.D.C. & Lindroth, R.L. (1999) Effects of light and nutrient availability on aspen: growth, phytochemistry and insect performance. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 25, 1687-1714.
17. Herms, D.A. & Mattson, W.J., Jr (1992) The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Quarterly Review of Biology, 67, 283-335.
18. Hwang, S.Y. & Lindroth, R.L. (1997) Clonal variation in foliar chemistry of aspen: effects on gypsy moths and forest tent caterpillars. Oecologia, 111, 99-108.
19. Hwang, S.Y. & Lindroth, R.L. (1998) Consequences of clonal variation in aspen photochemistry for late season herbivores. Ecoscience, 4, 508-516.
20. - availability on deciduous trees: phytochemistry and insect performance. Ecology, 78, 215-230.
21. Krause, S.C. & Raffa, K.F. (1996) Defoliation tolerance affects the spatial and temporal distributions of larch sawfly and natural enemy populations. Ecological Entomology, 21, 259-269.
22. Krischik, V.A. & Denno, R.F. (1983) Individual, population, and geographic patterns in plant defense. Variable Plants and Herbivores in Natural and Managed Systems (ed. by R. F. Denno and M. S. McClure). pp. 463-512. Academic Press, New York.
23. Lang, C.A. (1958) Simple microdetermination of Kjeldahl nitrogen in biological materials. Analytical Chemistry, 30, 1692-1694.
24. Lavenseau, L. (1982) Determination of the sex of caterpillars without dissection. International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology, 11, 359-361.
25. Lechowicz, M.J. & Mauffette, Y. (1986) Host preference of the gypsy moth in eastern North America versus European forests. Revue d'Entomologie du Québec, 31, 43-51.
26. Leonard, D.E. (1981) Bioecology of the gypsy moth Lymantria dispar, life stages, host plants, parasites, pathogens, predators, climatic effects. Technical Bulletin of the United States Department of Agriculture, 1584, 9-29.
27. Lindroth, R.L. & Hemming, J.D.C. (1990) Responses of the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) to tremulacin, an aspen phenolic glycoside. Environmental Entomology, 19, 842-847.
28. Lindroth, R.L. & Hwang, S.-Y. (1996a) Clonal variation in foliar chemistry of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 24, 357-364.
29. Lindroth, R.L. & Hwang, S.-Y. (1996b) Diversity, redundancy, and multiplicity in chemical defense systems of aspen. Phytochemical Diversity and Redundancy in Ecological Interactions (ed. by J. T. Romeo, J. A. Saunders and P. Barbosa), pp. 25-56. Plenum, New York.
30. 2 and defoliation: chemistry and gypsy moth performance. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 24, 1677-1695.
31. Lindroth, R.L. & Koss, P.A. (1996) Preservation of Salicaceae leaves for phytochemical analyses: further assessment. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 22, 765-771.
32. Lindroth, R.L., Hsia, M.T.S. & Scriber, J.M. (1987) Characterization of phenolic glycosides from quaking aspen. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 15, 677-680.
33. - availability. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 19, 357-367.
34. Matsuki, M. & MacLean, S.F., Jr (1994) Effects of different leaf traits on growth rates of insect herbivores on willows. Oecologia, 100, 141-152.
35. Mattson, W.J., Jr (1980) Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11, 119-161.
36. Mattson, W.J., Jr & Palmer, S.R. (1988) Changes in levels of foliar minerals and phenolics in trembling aspen, Populus tremuloides, in response to artificial defoliation. Mechanisms of Woody Plant Defences against Insects: Search for Pattern (ed. by W. J. Mattson Jr, J. C. Levieux and B. Dagan), pp. 157-169. Springer, New York.
37. Mitton, J.B. & Grant, M.C. (1996) Genetic variation and the natural history of quaking aspen. Bioscience, 46, 25-31.
38. Orians, C.M. & Floyd, T. (1997) The susceptibility of parental and hybrid willows to plant enemies under contrasting soil nutrient conditions. Oecologia, 109, 407-413.
39. Orians, C.M., Huang, C.H., Wild, A., Dorfman, K.A., Zee, P., Dao et al. (1997) Willow hybridization differentially affects preference and performance of herbivorous beetles. Entomologia experimentalis et applicata, 83, 285-294.
40. Ostry, M.E. (1988) A Guide to Insect, Disease, and Animal Pests of Poplars. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington DC.
41. Parkinson, J.A. & Alien, S.E. (1975) A wet oxidation procedure suitable for the determination of nitrogen and mineral nutrients in biological material. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 6, 1-11.
42. Perala, D.A. (1990) Populus tremuloides Michx. Quaking aspen. Silvics of North America (ed. by R. M. Burns and B. H. Honkala). United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Washington DC.
43. Porter, L.J., Hrstich, L.N. & Chan, B.G. (1986) The conversion of procyanidins and prodelphinidins to cyanidin and delphinidin. Phytochemistry, 25, 223-230.
44. Price, P.W., Bouton, C.E., Gross, P., McPheron, B.A., Thompson, J.N. & Weis, A.E. (1980) Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11, 41-65.
45. Raupp, M.J. & Denno, R.F. (1983) Leaf age as a predictor of herbivore distribution and abundance. Variable Plants and Herbivores in Natural and Managed Systems (ed. by R. F. Denno and M. S. McClure), pp. 463-512. Academic Press, New York.
46. Rhoades, D.F. (1979) Evolution of plant chemical defense against herbivores. Herbivores, Their Interaction with Secondary Plant Metabolites (ed. by G. A. Rosenthal and D. H. Janzen), pp. 3-54. Academic Press, New York.
47. Roche, B.M. & Fritz, R.S. (1997) Genetics of resistance of Salix sericea to a diverse community of herbivores. Evolution, 51, 1490-1498.
48. 2 and defoliation: effects on tree chemistry and insect performance. Global Change Biology, 4, 419-430.
49. SAS Institute (1989) SAS User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
50. Schultz, J.C. (1983) Habitat selection and foraging tactics of caterpillars in heterogeneous trees. Variable Plants and Herbivores in Natural and Managed Systems (ed. by R. F. Denno and M. S. McClure), pp. 61-86. Academic Press, New York.
51. Schultz, J.C. (1988) Many factors influence the evolution of herbivore diets, but plant chemistry is central. Ecology, 69, 896-897.
52. Scriber, J.M. & Slansky, F., Jr (1981) The nutritional ecology of immature insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 26, 183-211.
53. Shen, C.S. & Bach, C.E. (1997) Genetic variation in resistance and tolerance to insect herbivory in Salix cordata. Ecological Entomology, 22, 335-342.
54. Slansky, F., Jr (1993) Nutritional ecology: the fundamental quest for nutrients. Caterpillars: Ecological and Evolutionary Constraints on Foraging (ed. by N. E. Stamp and T. M. Casey), pp. 29-91. Chapman & Hall, New York.
55. Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York.
56. Stamp, N.E. & Bowers, M.D. (1990) Phenology of nutritional differences between new and mature leaves and its effect on caterpillar growth. Ecological Entomology, 15, 447-454.
57. Suomela, J. & Ayres, M.P. (1994) Within-tree and among-tree variation in leaf characteristics of mountain birch and its implications for herbivory. Oikos, 70, 212-222.
58. Suomela, J. & Nilson, A. ( 1994) Within-tree and among-tree variation in growth of Epirrita autumnata on mountain birch leaves. Ecological Entomology 19, 45-56.
59. Suomela, J., Ossipov, V. & Haukioja, E. (1995) Variation among and within mountain birch trees in foliage phenols, carbohydrates, and amino-acids, and in growth of Epirrita autumnata larvae. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 21, 1421-1446.
60. Suomela, J., Suominen, O. & Torvi, M. (1997) Variation in quality of mountain birch and tea-leaved willow for mammal and insect herbivores: differences among trees, among sites and between tree species. Ecography, 20, 224-232.