Wide variation in spatial genetic structure between natural populations of the European beech (Fagus sylvatica) and its implications for SGS comparability

Heredity

Volumn 108, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 633-639

  Jump, A S ^a,b   Rico, L ^b   Coll, M ^b   Peuelas J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

AFLP; gene flow; intraspecific variation; population density; population structure

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA;

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DECIDUOUS TREE; GENE FLOW; GENETIC RESOURCE; GENETIC STRUCTURE; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SPATIAL VARIATION; STANDARDIZATION;

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; ARTICLE; BEECH; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; PLANT GENOME;

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS; DNA, PLANT; FAGUS; GENE FLOW; GENETIC STRUCTURES; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, PLANT;

FAGUS; FAGUS SYLVATICA;

EID: 84861346657     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2012.1     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Asuka Y, Tomaru N, Nisimura N, Tsumura Y, Yamamoto S (2004). Heterogeneous genetic structure in a Fagus crenata population in an old-growth beech forest revealed by microsatellite markers. Mol Ecol 13: 1241-1250.
2. Bacilieri R, Labbe T, Kremer A (1994). Intraspecific genetic structure in a mixed population of Quercus petraea (Matt) Leibl and Quercus robur L. Heredity 73: 130-141.
3. Cavers S, Degen B, Caron H, Lemes MR, Margis R, Salgueiro F et al. (2005). Optimal sampling strategy for estimation of spatial genetic structure in tree populations. Heredity 95: 281-289.
4. Chung MY, Epperson BK, Chung MG (2003). Genetic structure of age classes in Camellia japonica (Theaceae). Evolution 57: 62-73.
5. Chybicki IJ, Trojankiewicz M, Oleksa A, Dzialuk A, Burczyk J (2009). Isolation-by-distance within naturally established populations of European beech (Fagus sylvatica). Botany 87: 791-798.
6. De Knegt HJ, van Langevelde F, Coughenour MB, Skidmore AK, De Boer WF, Heitkönig IMA et al. (2010). Spatial autocorrelation and the scaling of species-environment relationships. Ecology 91: 2455-2465.
7. Gapare WJ, Aitken SN (2005). Strong spatial genetic structure in peripheral but not core populations of Sitka spruce [Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.]. Mol Ecol 14: 2659-2667.
8. Gaudeul M, Till-Bottraud I, Barjon F, Manel S (2004). Genetic diversity and differentiation in Eryngium alpinum L. (Apiaceae): comparison of AFLP and microsatellite markers. Heredity 92: 508-518.
9. Gregorius H-R, Kownatzki D (2005). Spatiogenetic characteristics of beech stands with different degrees of autochthony. BMC Ecol 5:8 (doi:10.1186/1472- 6785-5-8)
10. Hampe A, El Masri L, Petit RJ (2010). Origin of spatial genetic structure in an expanding oak population. Mol Ecol 19: 459-471.
11. Hardesty BD, Dick DW, Kremer A, Hubbell S, Bermingham E (2005). Spatial genetic structure of Simarouba amara Aubl. (Simaroubaceae), a dioecious, animal-dispersed Neotropical tree, on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Heredity 95: 290-297.
12. Hardy OJ (2003). Estimation of pairwise relatedness between individuals and characterization of isolation-by-distance processes using dominant genetic markers. Mol Ecol 12: 1577-1588.
13. Hardy OJ, Maggia L, Bandou E, Breyne P, Caron H, Chevallier MH et al. (2006). Fine-scale genetic structure and gene dispersal inferences in 10 Neotropical tree species. Mol Ecol 15: 559-571.
14. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002). SPAGeDi: A versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes 2: 618-620.
15. Heuertz M, Vekemans X, Hausman JF, Palada M, Hardy OJ (2003). Estimating seed vs. pollen dispersal from spatial genetic structure in the common ash. Mol Ecol 12: 2483-2495.
16. Hollingsworth PM, Ennos RA (2004). Neighbour joining trees, dominant markers and population genetic structure. Heredity 92: 490-498.
17. Jolivet C, Holtken AM, Liesebach H, Steiner W, Degen B (2011). Spatial genetic structure in wild cherry (Prunus avium L.): I. variation among natural populations of different density. Tree Genet Genomes 7: 271-283.
18. Jump AS, Peñuelas J (2007). Extensive spatial genetic structure revealed by AFLP but not SSR molecular markers in the wind-pollinated tree, Fagus sylvatica. Mol Ecol 16: 925-936.
19. Kunstler G, Thuiller W, Curt T, Bouchaud M, Jouvie R, Deruette F et al. (2007). Fagus sylvatica L. recruitment across a fragmented Mediterranean Landscape, importance of long distance effective dispersal, abiotic conditions and biotic interactions. Diversity Distrib 13: 799-807.
20. Legendre P (1993). Spatial autocorrelation: Trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74: 1659-1673.
21. Leonardi S, Menozzi P (1996). Spatial structure of genetic variability in natural stands of Fagus sylvatica L (beech) in Italy. Heredity 77: 359-368.
22. Maguire TL, Peakall R, Saenger P (2002). Comparative analysis of genetic diversity in the mangrove species Avicennia marina (Forsk.) Vierh. (Avicenniaceae) detected by AFLPs and SSRs. Theor Appl Genet 104: 388-398.
23. Mariette S, Cottrell J, Csaikl UM, Goikoechea P, Konig A, Lowe AJ et al. (2002). Comparison of levels of genetic diversity detected with AFLP and microsatellite markers within and among mixed Q. petraea (MATT.) LIEBL. and Q. robur L. stands. Silvae Genet 51: 72-79.
24. Merzeau D, Comps B, Thiebaut B, Cuguen J, Letouzey J (1994). Genetic structure of natural stands Of Fagus sylvatica L (beech). Heredity 72: 269-277.
25. Nilsson SG (1985). Ecological and evolutionary interactions between reproduction of beech Fagus sylvatica and seed eating animals. Oikos 44: 157-164.
26. Oddou-Muratorio S, Bontemps A, Klein EK, Chybicki I, Vendramin GG, Suyama Y (2010). Comparison of direct and indirect genetic methods for estimating seed and pollen dispersal in Fagus sylvatica and Fagus crenata. Forest Ecol Manag 259: 2151-2159.
27. Oddou-Muratorio S, Demesure-Musch B, Pelissier R, Gouyon PH (2004). Impacts of gene flow and logging history on the local genetic structure of a scattered tree species, Sorbus torminalis L. Crantz. Mol Ecol 13: 3689-3702.
28. Pompanon F, Bonin A, Bellemain E, Taberlet P (2005). Genotyping errors: causes, consequences and solutions. Nat Rev Genet 6: 847-859.
29. Poska A, Pidek I (2010). Pollen dispersal and deposition characteristics of Abies alba, Fagus sylvatica and Pinus sylvestris, Roztocze region (SE Poland). Veg Hist Archaeobotany 19: 91-101.
30. Rousset F (2000). Genetic differentiation between individuals. J Evol Biol 13: 58-62.
31. Scalfi M, Piovani P, Piotti A, Leonardi S, Menozzi P. (2005). Effects of habitat fragmentation on genetic structure of beech populations in central Italy. In: The Role of Biotechnology for the Characterisation and Conservation of Crop, Forestry, Animal and Fishery Genetic Resources, FAO electronic forum on biotechnology in food and agriculture, Turin, Italy, http://www.fao.org/ biotech/torino05.htm. Skrede I, Borgen L, Brochmann C (2009). Genetic structuring in three closely related circumpolar plant species: AFLP versus microsatellite markers and high-arctic versus arctic-alpine distributions. Heredity 102: 293-302.
32. Smouse PE, Peakall R (1999). Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure. Heredity 82: 561-573.
33. Streiff R, Labbe T, Bacilieri R, Steinkellner H, Glossl J, Kremer A (1998). Withinpopulation genetic structure in Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. assessed with isozymes and microsatellites. Mol Ecol 7: 317-328.
34. Takahashi M, Mukouda M, Koono K (2000). Differences in genetic structure between two Japanese beech (Fagus crenata Blume) stands. Heredity 84: 103-115.
35. Vaughan SP, Cottrell JE, Moodley DJ, Connolly T, Russell K (2007). Distribution and finescale spatial-genetic structure in British wild cherry (Prunus avium L.). Heredity 98: 274-283.
36. Vekemans X, Beauwens T, Lemaire M, Roldan-Ruiz I (2002). Data from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers show indication of size homoplasy and of a relationship between degree of homoplasy and fragment size. Mol Ecol 11: 139-151.
37. Vekemans X, Hardy OJ (2004). New insights from fine-scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations. Mol Ecol 13: 921-935.
38. Vornam B, Decarli N, Gailing O (2004). Spatial distribution of genetic variation in a natural beech stand (Fagus sylvatica L. based on microsatellite markers. Conserv Genet 5: 561-570.
39. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, Vandelee T, Hornes M et al. (1995). AFLP - a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23: 4407-4414.
40. Wagner S, Collet C, Madsen P, Nakashizuka T, Nyland RD, Sagheb-Talebi K (2010). Beech regeneration research: From ecological to silvicultural aspects. For Ecol Manag 259: 2172-2182.
41. Woodhead M, Russell J, Squirrell J, Hollingsworth PM, Mackenzie K, Gibby M et al. (2005). Comparative analysis of population genetic structure in Athryium distentifolium (Pteridophyta) using AFLPs and SSRs from anonymous and transcribed genomic regions. Mol Ecol 14: 1681-1695.
42. Zeng LY, Xu LL, Tang SQ, Tersing T, Geng YP, Zhong Y (2010). Effect of sampling strategy on estimation of fine-scale spatial genetic structure in Androsace tapete (Primulaceae), an alpine plant endemic to Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. J Syst Evol 48: 257-264.