Distribution and fine-scale spatial-genetic structure in British wild cherry (Prunus avium L.)

Heredity

Volumn 98, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 274-283

  Vaughan, S P ^a,c   Cottrell, J E ^b   Moodley, D J ^a   Connolly, T ^b   Russell, K ^a  

^a EAST MALLING RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b FOREST RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^c ROTHAMSTED RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clonality; Prunus; Sexual reproduction; SGS; SSR

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA;

CLONAL GROWTH; CONSERVATION GENETICS; DICOTYLEDON; GENE FLOW; GENET; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC STRUCTURE; INTRAPOPULATION VARIATION; RAMET; RECRUITMENT; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

ARTICLE; ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DEMOGRAPHY; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION GENETICS; PRUNUS; VARIABLE NUMBER OF TANDEM REPEAT;

DEMOGRAPHY; DNA, PLANT; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; MINISATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; PRUNUS; REPRODUCTION, ASEXUAL; VARIATION (GENETICS);

PRUNUS; PRUNUS AVIUM;

EID: 34247618740     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800935     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Asuka Y, Tomaru N, Nisimura N, Tsumura Y, Yamamuto S (2004). Heterogeneous genetic structure in a Fagus crenata population in an old growth beech forest revealed by microsatellite markers. Mol Ecol 13: 1241-1250.
2. Chung MG, Epperson BK (2000). Clonal and spatial genetic structure in Eurya emarginata (Theaceae). Heredity 84: 170-177.
3. Cipriani G, Lot G, Huang WG, Marrazzo MT, Peterlunger E, Testolin R (1999). AC/GT and AG/CT microsatellite repeats in peach Prunus persica (L.) Batsch: isolation, characterisation and cross-species amplification in Prunus. Theor Appl Genet 99: 65-72.
4. Clark PJ, Evans FC (1954). Distance to nearest neighbour as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35: 445-453.
5. Cottrell JE, Munro RC, Tabbenner HE, Milner AD, Forrest GI, Lowe AJ (2003). Comparison of fine-scale genetic structure using microsatellites within two British oakwoods differing in population history. For Ecol Manage 176: 287-303.
6. Degen B, Petit R, Kremer A (2001). SGS-Spatial Genetic Software: a computer program for analysis of spatial genetic and phenotypic structures of individuals and populations. J Heredity 92: 447-448.
7. Dutech C, Seitier J, Petronelli P, Joly HI, Jarne P (2002). Evidence of low gene flow in a neotropical clustered tree species in two rainforest stands of French Guiana. Mol Ecol 11: 725-738.
8. Downey SL, Iezzoni AF (2000). Polymorphic DNA markers in black cherry (Prunus serotina) are identified using sequences from sweet cherry, peach and sour cherry. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 125: 76-80.
9. Epperson BK (2005). Mutation at high rates reduces spatial structure within populations. Mol Ecol 14: 703-710.
10. Frascaria N, Santi F, Gouyon PH (1993). Genetic differentiation within and among populations of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill) and wild cherry (Prunus avium L). Heredity 70: 634-641.
11. Garcia C, Arroyo JM, Godoy JA, Jordano P (2005). Mating patterns, pollen dispersal, and the ecological maternal eighbourhood in a Prunus mahaleb L. population. Mol Ecol 14: 1821-1830.
12. Godoy JA, Jordano P (2001). Seed dispersal by animals: exact identification of source trees with endocarp DNA microsatellites. Mol Ecol 10: 2275-2283.
13. Gömöry D, Paule L (2001). Spatial structure and mating system in wild cherry (Prunus avium) population. Biol Bratislava 56: 117-123.
14. Goudet J (1995). FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Heredity 86: 485-486.
15. Hardesty BD, Dick CW, Kremer A, Hubbell A, Bermingham E (2005). Spatial genetic structure of Simarouba amara Aubl. (Simaroubaceae), a dioecious, animal-dispersed Neotropical tree, on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Heredity 95: 290-297.
16. Hardy OJ, Maggia L, Bandou E, Breyne P, Caron H, Chevallier M-H et al. (2006). Fine-scale genetic structure and gene dispersal inferences in 10 Neotropical tree species. Mol Ecol 15: 559-571.
17. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002). SPAGeDI: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Primer Notes 2: 618.
18. Hedrick PW (2005). A standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution 59: 1633-1638.
19. Heuertz M, Hausman J-F, Hardy OJ, Vendramin GG, Frascaria-Lacoste N, Vekemans X (2004). Nuclear microsatellites reveal contrasting patterns of genetic structure between western and South-Eastern European populations of the common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.). Evolution 58: 976-988.
20. Heuertz M, Vekemans X, Hausman J-F, Palada M, Hardy OJ (2003). Estimating seed vs. pollen dispersal from spatial genetic structure in the common ash. Mol Ecol 12: 2483-2495.
21. Knight ME, Martin AP, Bishop S, Osbourne JL, Hale RJ, Sanderson RA et al. (2005). An interspecific comparison of foraging range and nest density of four bumblebee (Bombus) species. Mol Ecol 14: 1811-1820.
22. Loiselle BA, Sork Vl, nason J, Graham C (1995). Spatial genetic structure of tropical understory shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae). Am J Bot 82: 1420-1425.
23. Mariette S, Lefranc M, Legrand P, Taneyhill D, Frascaria-Lacoste N, Machon N (1997). Genetic variability in wild cherry populations in France. Effects of colonizing processes. Theor Appl Genet 94: 904-908.
24. Marquardt PE, Epperson BK (2004). Spatial and population genetic structure of microsatellites in white pine. Mol Ecol 13: 3305-3315.
25. Marshall T, Slate J, Kruuk L, Pemberton J (1998). Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7: 639-655.
26. Muranty H, Schermann N, Santi F, Dufour J (1998). Genetic parameters estimated from a wild cherry diallel: consequences for breeding. Silvae Genet 47: 249-257.
27. Nei M (1987). Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press: New York.
28. Oddou-Muratorio S, Demesure B, Pelissier R, Gouyon PH (2004). Impacts of gene flow and logging history on the local genetic structure of a scattered tree species, Sorbus torminalis L.Crantz. Mol Ecol 13: 3689-3702.
29. Russell K (2003). EUFORGEN Technical guidelines for genetic conservation and use for wild cherry (Prunus avium). International Plant Genetics Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, 6p.
30. Santi F (1988). Variabilité génétique intra et inter-populationns chez le merisier (Prunus avium L.). Thesis of the Institut National Agronomique Paris Grignon, 80p.
31. Siegel S (1956). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. McGraw-Hill: New York.
32. Schneider S, Kueffer J-M, Roessli D, Escoffier L (1997). Arlequin, Version 1.1: a software program for population genetic data analysis, Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
33. Silvertown J (2001). Plants stand still but their genes don't: non-trivial consequences of the obvious. In: Silvertown J, Antonovics J (eds), Integrating Evolution and Ecology in a Spatial Context. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. p 347.
34. Streiff R, Labbe T, Bacilieri R, Steinkellner H, Glassl J, Kremer A (1998). Within-population genetic structure in Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. assessed with isozymes and microsatellites. Mol Ecol 7: 317-328.
35. Turcek FJ (1968). The dissemination of Prunus avium L. by birds in forests. Waldhygiene 7: 129-132.
36. Vaughan SP, Russell K (2004). Characterization of novel microsatellites and development of multiplex PCR for large-scale population studies in wild cherry, Prunus avium. Mol Ecol Primer Notes 4: 429-431.
37. Vekemans X, Hardy OJ (2004). New insights from fine-scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations. Mol Ecol 13: 921-935.
38. Ward M, Dick CW, Gribel R, Lemes M, Caron H, Lowe AJ (2005). To self, or not to self. A review of outcrossing and pollen-mediated gene flow in neotropical trees. Heredity 95: 246-254.
39. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984). Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370.