Surgical strategies to achieve a custom-fit TKA with standard implant technique

Orthopedics

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2010, Pages

  Davis, Jason J ^a   Bono, James V ^a  

^a NEW ENGLAND BAPTIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMETRIC PARAMETERS; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; IMPLANT; INSTRUMENT; KINEMATICS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE ENDOPROSTHESIS; LEG MOVEMENT; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATELLA; PELVIS; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; REVIEW; ROTATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROSTHESIS; STANDARD;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 77955601625     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20100625-19     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Conley S, Rosenberg A, Crowninshield R. The female knee: anatomic variations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007; 15(Suppl 1):S31-36.
2. Theis KA, Helmick CG, Hootman JM. Arthritis burden and impact are greater among U.S. women than men: intervention opportunities. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007; 16(4):441-453.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation - United States, 2003-2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006; 55(40):1089-1092.
4. DeFrances CJ, Hall MJ. 2005 National Hospital Discharge Survey. Adv Data. 2007; (385):1-19.
5. Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC, et al. Determining the need for hip and knee arthroplasty: the role of clinical severity and patients' preferences. Med Care. 2001; 39(3):206-216.
6. Karlson EW, Daltroy LH, Liang MH, Eaton HE, Katz JN. Gender differences in patient preferences may underlie differential utilization of elective surgery. Am J Med. 1997; 102(6):524-530.
7. Katz JN, Wright EA, Guadagnoli E, Liang MH, Karlson EW, Cleary PD. Differences between men and women undergoing major orthopedic surgery for degenerative arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1994; 37(5):687-694. (Pubitemid 24145072)
8. Zalzal P, Papini M, Petruccelli D, de Beer J, Winemaker MJ. An in vivo biomechanical analysis of the soft-tissue envelope of osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19(2):217-223. (Pubitemid 38228804)
9. DeFrances CJ, Lucas CA, Buie VC, Golosinskiy A. 2006 National Hospital Discharge Survey. Natl Health Stat Report. 2008; (5):1-20.
10. Hitt K, Shurman JR II, Greene K, et al. Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(Suppl 4):115-122. (Pubitemid 37377433)
11. Chin KR, Dalury DF, Zurakowski D, Scott RD. Intraoperative measurements of male and female distal femurs during primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2002; 15(4):213-217.
12. Rosenstein AD, Veazey B, Shephard D, Xu KT. Gender differences in the distal femur dimensions and variation patterns in relation to TKA component sizing. Orthopedics. 2008; 31(7):652.
13. Mahfouz M, Booth R Jr, Argenson J, Merkl BC, Abdel Fatah EE, Kuhn MJ. Analysis of variation of adult femora using sex-specific statistical atlases. Paper presented at: Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Conference; March 22-25, 2006; Antibes, France.
14. Bengs BC, Scott RD. The effect of patellar thickness on intraoperative knee flexion and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21(5):650-655. (Pubitemid 44108559)
15. Merchant AC, Arendt EA, Dye SF, et al. The female knee: anatomic variations and the female-specific total knee design. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(12):3059-3065.
16. Fehring TK, Odum SM, Hughes J, Springer BD, Beaver WB Jr. Differences between the sexes in the anatomy of the anterior condyle of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(10):2335-2341.
17. Grelsamer RP, Dubey A, Weinstein CH. Men and women have similar Q angles: a clinical and trigonometric evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(11):1498-1501.
18. Mensch JS, Amstutz HC. Knee morphology as a guide to knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975; (112):231-241.
19. Font-Rodriguez DE, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997; (345):79-86. (Pubitemid 28007489)
20. Rand JA, Ilstrup DM. Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty. Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991; 73(3):397-409.
21. Wright RJ, Sledge CB, Poss R, Ewald FC, Walsh ME, Lingard EA. Patient-reported outcome and survivorship after Kinemax total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86(11):2464-2470. (Pubitemid 39473088)
22. Brander VA, Stulberg SD, Adams AD, et al. Predicting total knee replacement pain: a prospective, observational study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (416):27-36.
23. Dalury DF, Mason JB, Murphy JA, Adams MJ. Analysis of the outcome in male and female patients using a unisex total knee replacement system. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91(3):357-360.
24. MacDonald SJ, Charron KD, Bourne RB, Naudie DD, McCalden RW, Rorabeck CH. The John Insall Award: gender-specific total knee replacement: prospectively collected clinical outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(11):2612-2616.
25. Whiteside LA. The effect of patient age, gender, and tibial component fixation on pain relief after cementless total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991; (271):21-27.
26. Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Adams JB. Patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2008; 31(9):927-930.
27. Klatt BA, Goyal N, Austin MS, Hozack WJ. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23(1):26-29. (Pubitemid 350299760)
28. Bellemans J, Carpentier K, Vandenneucker H, Vanlauwe J, Victor J. The John Insall Award: Both morphotype and gender influence the shape of the knee in patients undergoing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(1):29-36.
29. Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A. Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84(1):50-53.
30. Greene KA. Gender-specific design in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(7 Suppl 3):27-31. (Pubitemid 47494614)
31. Harwin SF, Greene KA, Hitt K. Early experience with a new total knee implant: maximizing range of motion and function with gender-specific sizing. Surg Technol Int. 2007; (16):199-205.
32. Kadoya Y, Kobayashi A, Komatsu T, Nakagawa S, Yamano Y. Effects of posterior cruciate ligament resection on the tibiofemoral joint gap. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; (391):210-217. (Pubitemid 32954066)
33. Mihalko WM, Krackow KA. Posterior cruciate ligament effects on the flexion space in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (360):243-250. (Pubitemid 29140955)
34. Mahoney OM, Clarke HD, Mont MA, et al. Primary total knee arthroplasty: the impact of technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(Suppl 5):59-61.
35. Lesh ML, Schneider DJ, Deol G, Davis B, Jacobs CR, Pellegrini VD Jr. The consequences of anterior femoral notching in total knee arthroplasty. A biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82(8):1096-1101. (Pubitemid 30624967)
36. Ritter MA, Thong AE, Keating EM, et al. The effect of femoral notching during total knee arthroplasty on the prevalence of postoperative femoral fractures and on clinical outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(11):2411-2414. (Pubitemid 41546370)
37. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; (286):40-47.
38. Griffin FM, Math K, Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Poilvache PL. Anatomy of the epicondyles of the distal femur: MRI analysis of normal knees. J Arthroplasty. 2000; 15(3):354-359. (Pubitemid 30208353)
39. Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; (331):35-46. (Pubitemid 26357685)
40. Nagamine R, Miura H, Inoue Y, et al. Reliability of the anteroposterior axis and the posterior condylar axis for determining rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 1998; 3(4):194-198. (Pubitemid 28345580)
41. Fehring TK. Rotational malalignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000; (380):72-79.
42. Kinzel V, Ledger M, Shakespeare D. Can the epicondylar axis be defined accurately in total knee arthroplasty? Knee. 2005; 12 (4):293-296. (Pubitemid 40981804)
43. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Kim RH, Sharma A. Gap balancing versus measured resection technique for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(1):102-107.
44. Uehara K, Kadoya Y, Kobayashi A, Ohashi H, Yamano Y. Bone anatomy and rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (402):196-201. (Pubitemid 35006591)