Types of student intertextuality and faculty attitudes

Journal of Second Language Writing

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 149-164

  Pecorari, Diane ^a   Shaw, Philip ^b  

^a LINNAEUS UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Academic writing; English; Faculty attitudes; Intertextuality; Plagiarism; Source use; Sweden

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861185626     PISSN: 10603743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Austen J. Pride and prejudice 1980, Octopus Books, London.
2. Biber D., Johansson S., Leech G., Conrad S., Finegan E. Longman grammar of spoken and written English 1999, Longman, Harlow, UK.
3. Borg E. Local plagiarisms. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2009, 34:415-426.
4. Bourdieu P., Passeron J.-C. Introduction: Langage et rapport au langage dans la situation pédagogique. Rapport pédagogique et communication 1965, 13-36. Mouton, Paris. P. Bourdieu, J.-C. Passeron, M. de Saint Martin (Eds.).
5. Crocker J., Shaw P. Research student and supervisor evaluation of intertextuality practices. Hermes 2002, 28:39-58.
6. Errey L. Plagiarism: Something fishy... or just a fish out of water?. Teaching Forum 2002, 50:17-20.
7. Flint A., Clegg S., Macdonald R. Exploring staff perceptions of student plagiarism. Journal of Further and Higher Education 2006, 30:145-156.
8. Flint A., Macdonald R., Clegg S. Emotion, practice, and plagiarism: Exploring the staff perspective. Plagiarism: Prevention, practice and policy conference 2005, 65-72. Northumbria University Press, Newcastle. A. Peden Smith, F. Duggan (Eds.).
9. Ha P.L. Plagiarism and overseas students: Stereotypes again?. ELT Journal 2006, 60:76-78.
10. Hoey M. Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language 2005, Routledge, London.
11. Hoey M., O'Donnell M.B. Lexicography, grammar, and textual position. International Journal of Lexicography 2008, 21:293-309.
12. Howard R.M. Plagiarisms, authorships, and the academic death penalty. College English 1995, 57:788-805.
13. Hunston S., Francis G. Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English 2000, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
14. Kachru B.B. Standards, codification, and sociolinguistic realm: The English language in the outer circle. English in the world 1985, 11-30. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. R. Quirk, H. Widdowson (Eds.).
15. Klitgård, I. (2009). From copy-and-paste to trace-and-learn: A qualitative survey of student perceptions of plagiarism. Zeitschrift schreiben. Retrieved from: . http://www.zeitschrift-schreiben.eu/cgi-bin/joolma/index.php%3Foption=com_frontpage%26Itemid=29.
16. Kubota R. Toward critical contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Second Language Writing 2004, 13:7-27.
17. Lillis T. Whose common sense? Essayist literacy and the institutional practice of mystery. Students writing in the university: Cultural and epistemological issues 1999, 127-147. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. C. Jones, J. Turner, B. Street (Eds.).
18. Liu D. Plagiarism in ESOL students: Is cultural conditioning truly the major culprit?. ELT Journal 2005, 59:234-241.
19. Marsh R.L., Bower G.H. Eliciting cryptomnesia: Unconscious plagiarism in a puzzle task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition 1993, 19:673-688.
20. Patrides G.A. The 'universall and publik manuscript' of commonplaces. Neophilologus 1963, 47(1):217-220.
21. Pecorari D. Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 2003, 12:317-345.
22. Pecorari D. Academic writing and plagiarism: A linguistic analysis 2008, Continuum, London.
23. Pecorari D. Repeated language in academic discourse: The case of biology background statements. Nordic Journal of English Studies 2008, 7(3):9-33.
24. Pecorari D. Formulaic language in biology: A topic-specific investigation. Academic writing: At the interface of corpus and discourse 2009, 91-104. Continuum, London. M. Charles, D. Pecorari, S. Hunson (Eds.).
25. Roig M. Can undergraduate students determine whether a text has been plagiarized?. Psychological Record 1997, 47:113-122.
26. Roig M. Plagiarism and paraphrasing criteria of college and university professors. Ethics and Behavior 2001, 11:307-323.
27. Shaw, P., & Pecorari, D. (in preparation). Types of Intertextuality in Chairman's Statements.
28. Shi L. Textual borrowing in second-language writing. Written Communication 2004, 21:171-200.
29. Shi L. Cultural backgrounds and textual appropriation. Language Awareness 2006, 15:264-282.
30. Sinclair McH.J. The nature of the evidence. Looking up: An account of the COBUILD project in lexical computing 1987, 150-159. Collins, London. J. Sinclair (Ed.).
31. Smith J.A., Eatough V. Interpretive phenomenological analysis. Research methods in psychology 2006, 322-341. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 3rd ed. G. Breakwell, S.M. Hammond, C. Fife-Schaw, J.A. Smith (Eds.).
32. Sowden C. Plagiarism and the culture of multilingual students in higher education abroad. ELT Journal 2005, 59:226-233.
33. Sutherland-Smith W. Pandora's box: Academic perceptions of student plagiarism in writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2005, 4:83-95.
34. Swales J.M. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
35. Timm, A. (2007a). Educational practices at undergraduate level in Greece. Paper presented at the International Students, Academic Writing and Plagiarism Conference, Lancaster University, 5-7 September.
36. Timm, A. (2007b). Educational practices at undergraduate level in India. Paper presented at the International Students, Academic Writing and Plagiarism Conference, Lancaster University, 5-7 September.
37. White H.D. Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied Linguistics 2004, 25:89-116.