The investigation of physics pre-service teachers' social learning styles in terms of various variables

Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 1689-1702

  Berber, Nilufer Cerit ^a   Oral, Imran ^a  

^a SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Differences; Learning styles; Physics education; Pre service; Science education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861141967     PISSN: 13087711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Oxford University Press, New York, 1993.
2. National Research Council. National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1996.
3. Abak A. Modeling the relationship between university students' selected affective characteristics and their physics achievement. Master Thesis, METU, Ankara, Turkey, 2003.
4. Ballone LM, Czerniak CM. Teacher's beliefs about accommodating students' learning styles in science classes. J Sci Educ 2001;6:1-40.
5. Boydak A. Ogrenme stilleri. Istanbul: Beyaz Publications, 2001 [in Turkish].
6. Grasha AF. Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhancing learning by understanding teaching and learning. Alliance, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996.
7. Cassidy S. Learning styles: an overview of theories, models and measures. Educ Psych 2004;24: 419-444.
8. Knowles E, Smith M. Boys and literacy: Practical strategies for librarians, teachers, and parents. Libraries Unlimited, Westport, CT, 2005.
9. Sonnenwald DH, Li B. Scientific collaboratories in higher education: Exploring learning style preferences and perceptions of technology. British J Educ Tech 2003;34:419-431.
10. Dunn R, Dunn K. Research with the Dunn and Dunn Model. Jamaica, NY: St. John's University's Center for the Study of Learning and Teaching Styles, 2002.
11. Felder RM, Soloman BA. Index of learning styles questionnaire. Retrieved January, 15, 2011, from http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html,2003.
12. Vermunt JD. 1998. The regulation of constructive learning processes. British J Educ Psych 1998;68:149-171.
13. Felder RM, Spurlin J. Applications, reliability and validity of the index of learning styles. Int J Engin Educ 2005;21:103-112.
14. Tiberghien A., Jossem EL, Barrojas J. (Eds.) Connecting research in Physics education with teacher education. I.C.P.E. Book, Inter Comm Phys Educ 1998.
15. Onder F. Fizik egitiminde ogrenme stillerine dayali ogretim yontemlerinin ogrenci basarisi uzerindeki etkileri. Master Thesis, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, 2006 [in Turkish].
16. Viennot L. Raisonner en physique, la part du sens commun. Ed. De Boeck, Bruxelles, 1996.
17. Karasar N. Bilimsel arastirma yontemi. Nobel Publications, Ankara1998 [in Turkish].
18. Cepni S. Arastirma ve proje calismalarina giris (5. Edition). Celepler Print House, Trabzon, 2010 [in Turkish].
19. Jonassen DH, Grabowski BL. Handbook of individual differences, learning and instruction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1993.
20. Grasha AF, Riechmann S. The Grasha-Riechmann student learning style scales: research findings and applications. In: Keefe, J. (ed.), Student learning styles and brain behavior, Reston, VA: NASSP, 1982.
21. Baykul Y, Gursel M, Sulak H, Ertekin E, Yazici E, Dulger O, Aslan Y, Buyukkarci K. A validity and reliability study of Grasha-Riechmann student learning style scale. Int J Human Soc Sci 2010;5:177-184.
22. Short GFL. Learning, teaching, and supervisory styles in field education: The working alliance. Doctoral Dissertation, University of South Carolina, 2001.
23. Plackett RL. Karl Pearson and the chi-squared test. Int Statis Rev (Int Statist Inst [ISI]) 1983;51:59-72.
24. Cayci B, Unal E. Sinif ogretmeni adaylarinin sahip olduklari ogrenme stillerinin cesitli degiskenlere gore incelenmesi, 2007. http://www.universite-toplum.org/pdf/pdf_UT_328.pdf, July 20, 2011 [in Turkish].
25. Celenk S, Karakis O. Bazi yuksekogretim kurumlarinda ogrenim goren ogrencilerin farkli ogrenme stillerine sahip olma duzeyleri, 16. Ulusal Egitim Bilimleri Kongresi. September 5-7, Tokat: Gaziosmanpasa University, 2007 [in Turkish].
26. Kaf-Hasirci O. Sinif ogretmenligi ogrencilerinin ogrenme stilleri: Cukurova Universitesi Ornegi. Egit Kur Uyg 2006;2:15-25 [in Turkish].
27. Oluk S, Sambur E, Can S. Farkli alanlarda ogrenim goren ogretmen adaylarinin ogrenme stillerinin belirlenmesi ve karsilastirilmasi. 16. Ulusal Egitim Bilimleri Kongresi. September, 5-7, Tokat: Gaziosmanpasa University, 2007 [in Turkish].
28. Ozbek O. Ilkogretim ogrencilerinin ogrenme stillerinin incelenmesi. 16. Ulusal Egitim Bilimleri Kongresi. 5-7 Eylul, Tokat: Gaziosmanpasa University, 2007 [in Turkish].
29. Yenice N, Saracalaoglu AS. Sinif ogretmeni adaylarinin ogrenme stilleri ile fen basarilari arasindaki iliski. Yuzuncu Yil Univ Egit Fak Derg 2009;6:162-173 [in Turkish].
30. Gurol A. Determining the reflective thinking skills of pre-service teachers in learning and teaching process. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:387-402.
31. Keser OF. Identifying mental models in physics. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:183-190.
32. Ames PC. Gender and learning style interactions in students' computer attitudes. J of Educ Comp Res 2003;28:231-244.
33. Arslan B, Babadogan C. Ilkogretim 7. ve 8. sinif ogrencilerinin ogrenme stillerinin akademik basari duzeyi, cinsiyet ve yas ile iliskisi. Egit Aras Derg 2005;21:35-48 [in Turkish].
34. Bahar HH, Ozen Y, Gulacti F. Egitim fakultesi ogrencilerinin cinsiyet ve kayitli olunan programa gore akademik basari durumlarinin ve ogrenme stillerinin incelenmesi. 16. Ulusal Egitim Bilimleri Kongresi. September 5-7, Tokat: Gaziosmanpasa University, 2007 [in Turkish].
35. Hallock D, Satava D, LeSage T. An exploratory investigation of the potential relationship between student learning styles, course grade, cumulative grade point average and selected demographics in on-line undergraduate businesscourses. Manage Res News 2003;26:21-28.
36. Jones C. Reichard C, Mokhtari K. Are students' learning styles disciplines specific? Community college. J Res Prac 2003;27:363-375.
37. Ozen R, Arsal Z. The learning style preferences of ELT teacher candidates, 2nd English Language Teaching Conference, ELT Profession: Challenges and Prospects. May 2-5, Near East University, Famagusta, 2006.
38. Sural S. Sinif Ogretmenligi Ogretmen Adaylarinin Ogrenme Stilleri ile Fen ve Teknoloji Ogretimi Dersindeki Akademik Basarilari Arasindaki Iliski. Master Thesis, Pamukkale University, Denizli, 2008 [in Turkish].
39. Askin O. Ogrenme stilleri ile ilgili elektronik ortamda yayimlanan calismalarin incelenmesi. Master Thesis, Ankara University, Ankara, 2006 [in Turkish].
40. Dincer T. Anadolu universitesi ogrencilerinin ogrenme stilleri ve fizik ogrenme stilleri. Master Thesis, Marmara University, Istanbul, 2007 [in Turkish].
41. Dunn R. Learning styles of the multiculturaly divers. Emerg Libr 1993;20:25-32.
42. Gursoy T. Ogretmen adaylarinin ogrenme stillerinin cesitli degiskenler acisindan incelenmesi. Master Thesis, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, 2008 [in Turkish].
43. Bilgin I, Durmus S. Ogrenme stilleri ile ogrenci basarisi arasindaki iliski uzerine karsilastirmali bir arastirma. Kur Uyg Egit Bil 2003;3:381-400 [in Turkish].
44. Boatman K, Courtney R, Lee W. See how they learn: The impact of faculty and student learning styles on student performance in introductory economics. Am Eco 2008;52:39-48.
45. Cano-Garcia F, Hewitt-Hughes E. Learning and thinking styles: An analysis of their interrelationship and influence on academic achievement. Educ Psych 2000;20:413-432.
46. Chiou W. College students' role models, learning style preferences and academic achievement in collaborative teaching: absolure versus relativistic thinking. Adoles 2008;43:129-142.
47. Collison E. A survey of elementary students learning style preferences and academic success. Contemp Educ 2000;71:42-49.
48. Kvan T, Yunyan J.Student's learning styles and their correlation with performance in architectural design studio. Des Stud 2005;26:19-34.
49. Lang HG, Stinson MS, Kavanagh F, Liu Y, Basile ML. Learning styles of deaf college students and instructors' teaching emphases. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ1999;4:16-27.
50. Matthews DB. An investigation of learning styles and perceived academic achievement for high school students. Clear Hou 1996;69:249-254.
51. Woolhouse M, Blaire T. Learning styles and retention and achievement on a two-year a-level programme in a further education college. J Furt High Educ 2003;27:257-269.
52. Uzuntiryaki E, Bilgin N, Geban O. The effect of learning styles on high school students' achievement and attitudes in chemistry. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Symposium. March 23-26, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 2003.
53. Tuysuz C, Tatar E. Ogretmen adaylarinin ogrenme stillerinin kimya dersine yonelik tutum ve basarilarina etkisi. Mustafa Kemal Univ J Soc Sci Inst 2008;5:97-107 [in Turkish].
54. Tatar E, Tuysuz C, Ilhan N. Kimya ogretmen adaylarinin ogrenme stillerinin akademik basariyla iliskisi. Mustafa Kemal Un Sos Bil Enst Derg 2008;5:185-192 [in Turkish].
55. Kolay B. Ogretim stillerinin farkli ogrenme stillerine sahip 6. sinif ogrencilerinin fen ve teknoloji dersi basarisi arasindaki iliski. Master Thesis, Abant Izzet Baysal Un Sos Bil Ens, Bolu, 2008 [in Turkish].
56. Alsan EU. Temel kimya laboratuari dersinde ogretmen adaylarinin basarilarina ogrenme stili tercihlerinin etkisi. Necatibey Fac Educ Elect J Sci Math Educ 2009;3:117-133 [in Turkish].
57. Metin M, Kaleli Yilmaz G, Birisci S, Coskun K. The investigating high school students? learning styles with respect to the different variable: a sample from Turkey. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:589-604.
58. Redish EF. The implications of cognitive studies for teaching physics. Am J Phys 1994;62:796-803.
59. Sevindik T. Determining the attitudes of the preservice teachers about distance education applications. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:527-534.
60. Erdogan A. Preservice mathematics teachers' conceptions of and approaches to learning: A phenomenographic study. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2012;4:21-30.
61. Piskin Tunc M, Durmus S. Pre-service elementary school classroom and mathematics teachers' interpretations about the definition of angle concept. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2012;4:131-140.
62. Altun Yalcin S. Investigating of pre service science teachers' views of the nature of science according to grade level and gender and determining effectuality of education faculties about developing nature of science. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2012;4:223-232.