The investigating high school students' learning styles with respect to the different variables: A sample from Turkey

Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 589-604

  Metin, Mustafa ^a   Yilmaz, Gul Kaleli ^b   Birisci, Salih ^a   Coskun, Kerem ^a  

^a ARTVIN CORUH UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b BAYBURT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

High school students; Kolb learning style; Learning styles

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861123957     PISSN: 13087711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ozden Y. Ogrenme ve Ogretme. Second Edition. Ankara, 1998 [in Turkish].
2. Baki A. Kuramdan Uygulamaya Matematik Egitimi. Harf Egitim Yayincilik, Ankara, 2008 [in Turkish]
3. Kolb DA. Learning Style Inventory (revisited edition). Boston: McBer, 1985.
4. Keefe JW. Learning style: An overview. In NASSP's Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 1-17). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals, 1979.
5. Reinert H. One picture is worth a thousand words? Not necessarily. Modern Language J., 60:160-168. http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/styles/reinert.htm, 1976.
6. Jonassen HD, Grobowski BL. Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning and Instruction. 1st Edn., Lawrance Erlbaum Associates, USA, 1993.
7. Honey P, Mumford A. The Manual of Learning Styles. Maidenhead: Peter Honey Publications, 1992.
8. Dunn, R., Dunn, K. Teaching secondary students through their individual learning styles: Practical approaches for grades 7-12. Allyn ve Bacon: Boston, 1993.
9. Legendre P, Legendre L. Numerical Ecology. 2nd Edn., Science BV Amsterdam, Elsevier, http://books.google.com/books?id=KBoHuoNRO5. MC&printsec=frontcover&hl=tr, 1998.
10. Boydak A. Ogrenme Stilleri, Beyaz Publishing, Istanbul, 2001 [in Turkish].
11. Guven M. Ogrenme Stilleri ile Ogrenme Stratejileri Arasindaki Iliski. PhD Thesis. Anadolu University. Eskisehir, Turkey, 2004 [in Turkish].
12. Carroll A. How to Study Better and Faster-Using Your Learning Styles and Strenghts-. J. Weston Walch Publisher, Portland, Maine, 1998.
13. Dunn R, Dunn K. Teaching students through their individual learning styles: A practical approach. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing Company, 1978.
14. Grasha AF, Riechrnann SW. Strident leaming styles qiiestioitnaire. Cincinatti, OH: University of Cincinatti Faculty Resource Center, 1975.
15. Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1984.
16. Grecorc AF. Gregorc Style Delineator. Maynard, MA: Gabriel Systems, 1982.
17. Hall AL. A Critical Exploration of Learning Style Preferences and The Mathematical Achievement of Chapter 1 Middle School Students Administrative and Instructional Implications, Thesis Oklahama State University, 1993.
18. Kolb DA, Rubin IM, McIntyre JM. Organizational Psychology, A Book of Readings, Third Edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 07632, Chapter 11: Personal Growth and Career Development, Career Development, Personal Growth, and Experiential Learning 1979:543-549.
19. Kolb DA. Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In The modern American college, edited by A. W. Chickering and Associates, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1981, 232-55.
20. Kolb DA. The Kolb Learning Style Inventory, Version 3. Boston: Hay Group, 1999.
21. Askar P, Akkoyunlu B. Kolb ogrenme stili envanteri. Egit Bilim 1993;87:37-47 [in Turkish].
22. Peker M. Ogrenme stilleri ve 4 MAT yonteminin ogrencilerin matematik tutum ve basarilarina etkisi. PhD. Thesis, Gazi University, Ankara, 2003 [in Turkish].
23. Riding R, Rayner S. Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies-Understanding Style Differences in Learning and Behaviour-. David Fulton Publishers, London, 1998.
24. Yazici E. Ogrenme Stilleri ile Ilkogretim Besinci Sinif Matematik Dersindeki Basari Arasindaki Iliski. Selcuk Universitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu, Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Konya, 2004 [in Turkish].
25. Veznedaroglu RL, Ozgur AO. Ogrenme stilleri: Tanimlamalar, modeller ve islevleri. ilkogretim-online 2005;4:1-16 [in Turkish].
26. Mathews DB. An investigation of learning styles and perceived academic achievement for high school student. Clear Hous 1996;249-255.
27. Fox RL, Ronkowski SA. Learning styles of political science students. PS: Politic Sci Politic 1997;30:732-737.
28. Ergur DO. Hacettepe Universitesi dort yillik lisans programlarindaki ogrenci ve ogretim uyelerinin ogrenme stillerinin karsilastirilmasi. PhD. Tehesis, HU Ankara, 1998 [in Turkish].
29. Lukow J. Learning styles as predictors of student attitudes toward the use of technology in recreation courses. Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington (UMI No. 3054366), 2002.
30. Oral B. Ortaogretim ogrencilerinin ogrenme stillerinin belirlenmesi. Kuram Uygul Egit Yon 2003;418-435 [in Turkish].
31. Ozsoy N, Yagdiran E, Ozturk G. Onuncu sinif ogrencilerinin ogrenme stilleri ve geometrik dusunme duzeyleri. Egitim Arast 2004;16:50-63 [in Turkish].
32. Numanoglu G, Sen B. Bilgisayar ve ogretim teknolojileri egitimi bolumu ogrencilerinin ogrenme stilleri. AEU Kirsehir Egit Fak Derg, 2007;8:129-148 [in Turkish].
33. Dincer T. Anadolu Lisesi Ogrencilerinin Ogrenme Stilleri ve Fizik Ogrenme Stilleri. Master Thesis, Marmara University, Istanbul, 2007 [in Turkish].
34. Palas Aktas I, Mirzeoglu DE. Ilkogretim II. Kademe ogrencilerinin ogrenme stillerinin okul basarilarina ve beden egitimi dersine yonelik tutumlarina etkisi. Spormet Beden Egit Spor Bil Derg 2009;VII(1): 1-8 [in Turkish].
35. Demir R. Dokuzuncu Sinif Ogrencilerinin Ogrenme Stilleri ve Coklu Zeka Alanlarinin Incelenmesi. Cukurova University, Master Thesis, Adana, 2010 [in Turkish].
36. Fraenkel JR, Wallen NE. How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: Mc Graw Hill, 2003.
37. Kaya F, Ozabaci N, Tezel O. Investigating primary school second grade students' learning styles according to the kolb learning style model in terms of demographic variables. J Turkish Sci Educ 2009;6:11-25.
38. Demirbas OO, Demirkan H. Learning styles of design students and the relationship of academic performance and gender in design education. Learn Instruc 2007;17:345-359 [in Turkish].
39. Cavas B. A study on pre-service science, class and mathematics teachers' learning styles in Turkey. Sci Educ Int 2010;21:47-61.
40. Koseoglu P. Ogretmen Adaylarinin Ogrenme Stilleri ile Biyoloji Ogretimine Yonelik Tutumlari Arasindaki Iliski, http://oc.eab.org.tr/egtconf/pdfkitap/pdf/552.pdf, 2009 [in Turkish].
41. Tuna S. Resim-i{dotless}s ogretmenligi ogrencilerinin ogrenme stilleri. Elekt Sosyal Bil Derg 2008;7:252-261 [in Turkish].
42. Oztas F, Bozkurt E. Biology teacher candidates' misconceptions about surface tension, adhesion and cohesion. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:75-85.
43. Ates A, Altun E. Bilgisayar ve ogretim teknolojileri egitimi ogrencilerinin ogrenme bicemleri ve ogrenme tercihleri. Eur J Educ Res 2008;30:1-16 [in Turkish].
44. Guven M, Kurum D. Teacher candidates' learning styles and critical thinking dipositions. elektronik sosyal bilimler dergisi 2007;6:60-90 [in Turkish].
45. Garland D, Martin, BN. Do gender and learning style play a role in how online courses should be designed? J Online Interact Learn 2005;4:67-81.
46. Magolda MBB. Gender differences in cognitive development: An analysis of cognitive complexity and learning styles. J College Stud Develop1989;213-20.
47. Collinson E. A survey of elementary students' learning style preferences and academic success. Contemp Educ 2000;71:42-46.
48. Dikmenli M, Cardak O, Oztas F, Yakisan M. High school students' images of an environmental scientist. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2010;2:187-210.
49. Prokop P, Tunnicliffe SD, Kubiatko M, Hornáčková A, Usak M. The role of teacher in students' attitudes to and achievement in palaeontology. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:29-45.
50. Inan HZ. Teaching science process skills in kindergarten. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:47-64.
51. Kubiatko M, Vaculová I. Project-based learning: characteristic and the experiences with application in the science subjects. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:65-74.