Improved motor recovery after stroke and massive cortical reorganization following Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America

Volumn 14, Issue 1 SUPPL., 2003, Pages

  Taub, Edward ^a,b   Uswatte, Gitendra ^a   Morris, David M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b BIRMINGHAM VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADOLESCENT; AGED; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; APHASIA; ARM; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN INJURY; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DEPRESSION; CEREBRAL PALSY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONDITIONING; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSTRAINT INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DYSTONIA; ELECTROMYOGRAM; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FORELIMB; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMMOBILIZATION STRESS; LEARNING; LIFE; LOCOMOTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MONKEY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT THERAPY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM PAIN; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PLASTER CAST; PLASTICITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REINFORCEMENT; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TECHNIQUE; TRAINING; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANIMALS; APHASIA; BRAIN INJURIES; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DYSTONIA; ELECTROMAGNETICS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HAND; HAPLORHINI; HUMANS; MOTOR CORTEX; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 0037328030     PISSN: 10479651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1047-9651(02)00052-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (58)

1. Broca P. Nouvelle observation d'aphemie produite parune lesion de la motie posterieure des deuxieme et troissieme circonvulutions frontales. Bull Soc Anat Paris 1861;6:398-407.
2. Mott FW, Sherrington CS. Experiments upon the influence of sensory nerves upon movement and nutrition of limbs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 1895; 57:481-8.
3. Taub E, Berman AJ. Movement and learning in the absence of sensory feedback. In: Freedman SJ, editor. The neuropsychology of spatially oriented behavior. Homewood (IL): Dorsey Press; 1968. p. 173-92.
4. Taub E. Movement in nonhuman primates deprived of somatosensory feedback. In: Exercise and sports science reviews. Santa Barbara (CA): Journal Publishing Affiliates; 1977. p. 335-74.
5. Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medicine. In: Ince LP, editor. Behavioral psychology in rehabilitation medicine: clinical applications. New York: Williams & Wilkins; 1980. p. 371-401.
6. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:347-54.
7. Taub E, Burgio L, Miller NE, et al. An operant approach to overcoming learned nonuse after CNS damage in monkeys and man: the role of shaping. J Exp Anal Behav 1994;61: 281-93.
8. Taub E, Crago JE. Behavioral plasticity following central nervous system damage in monkeys and man. In: Julesz B, Kovacs I, editors. Maturational windows and adult cortical plasticity. SFI studies in the sciences of complexity. Redwood City (CA): Addison-Wesley; 1995. p. 201-15.
9. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti RD. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation-a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999;36:237-51.
10. Taub E, Uswatte G, Elbert T. New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002;3:228-36.
11. Morris D, Crago J, DeLuca S, et al. Constraint-induced (CI) movement therapy for motor recovery after stroke. NeuroRehabilitation 1997;9:29-43.
12. Morgan WG. The shaping game: a teaching technique. Behav Res Ther 1974;5:271-2.
13. Panyan MV. How to use shaping. Lawrence (KS): H & H Enterprises; 1980. p. 1-26.
14. Skinner BF. The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1938.
15. Skinner BF. The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1968.
16. Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM, Ochs MT, et al. Functional reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in adult owl monkeys after behaviorally controlled tactile stimulation. J Neurophysiol 1990;63:82-104.
17. Recanzone GH, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. Progressive improvement in discriminative abilities in adult owl monkeys performing a tactile frequency discrimination task. J Neurophysiol 1992;67:1015-30.
18. Recanzone GH, Merzenich MM, Jenkins WM. Frequency discrimination training engaging a restricted skin surface results in emergence of a cutaneous response zone in cortical area 3a. J Neurophysiol 1992;67:1057-70.
19. Recanzone GH, Merzenich MM, Jenkins WM, et al. Topographic reorganization of the hand representation in area 3b of owl monkeys trained in a frequency discrimination task. J Neurophysiol 1992;67:1031-56.
20. Elbert T, Pantev C, Wienbruch C, et al. Increased use of the left hand in string players associated with increased cortical representation of the fingers. Science 1995;220: 21-3.
21. Sterr A, Mueller MM, Elbert T, et al. Changed perceptions in Braille readers. Nature 1988;391:134-5.
22. Pons TP, Garraghty AK, Ommaya AK, et al. Massive cortical reorganization after sensory deafferentation in adult macaques. Science 1990;252:1857-60.
23. Flor H, Elbert T, Knecht S, et al. Phantom limb pain as a perceptual correlate of massive reorganization in upper limb amputees. Nature 1995;375:482-4.
24. Mühlnickel W, Elbert T, Taub E, et al. Reorganization or primary auditory cortex in tinnitus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:10340-43.
25. Elbert T, Candia B, Altenmüller E, et al. Alteration of digital representations in somatosensory cortex in focal hand dystonia. Neuroreport 1998;9:3571-5.
26. Elbert T, Flor H, Birbaumer N, et al. Extensive reorganization of the somatosensory cortex in adult humans after nervous system injury. Neuroreport 1994;5:2593-7.
27. Yang TT, Gallen C, Schwartz B, et al. Sensory maps in the human brain. Nature 1994; 368:592-3.
28. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, Sifuentes F, et al. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery following ischemic infarct. Science 1996;272:1791-4.
29. Liepert J, Bauder H, Sommer M, et al. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 1998;250:5-8.
30. Liepert J, Bauder H, Miltner WHR, et al. Treatment-induced massive cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stoke 2000;31:1210-6.
31. Kopp B, Kunkel A, Mühlnickel W, et al. Plasticity in the motor system related to therapy-induced improvement of movement after stroke. Neuroreport 1999;10:807-10.
32. Levy CE, Nichols DS, Schmalbrock PM, et al. Functional MRI evidence of cortical reorganization in upper-limb stroke hemiplegia treated with constraint-induced movement therapy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:4-12.
33. Bauder H, Sommer M, Taub E, et al. Effects of CI therapy on movement-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 1999;36:S31.
34. Ostendorf CG, Wolf SL. Effect of forced use of the upper extremity of a hemiplegic patient on changes in function. Phys Ther 1981;61:1022-8.
35. Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, et al. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol 1989;104:125-32.
36. Taub E, Crago JE, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new approach to treatment in physical rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology 1998;43:152-70.
37. Taub E, Uswatte G. A new approach to treatment and measurement in physical rehabilitation: constraint-induced (CI) movement therapy. In: Frank RG, Elliot TR, editors. Handbook of rehabilitation psychology. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2000. p. 215-29.
38. Butefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Kensler P, et al. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 1995;130:59-68.
39. Hesse S, Bertelt C, Schaffrin A, et al. Restoration of gait in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients by treadmill training with partial body-weight support. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:1087-93.
40. Miltner WHR, Bauder H, Sommer M, et al. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on chronic stroke patients: a replication. Stroke 1999;30:586-92.
41. Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a powerful new technique to induce motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:624-8.
42. Sterr A, Elbert T, Berthold I, et al. CI therapy in chronic hemiparesis: the more the better? Arch Phys Med Rehabil, in press.
43. Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Halhn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke 2000;82:2984-8.
44. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press; 1997.
45. Shaw SE, Morris DM, Yakley SR, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy to improve upper extremity function in subjects following traumatic brain injury. Poster presentation at the American Physical Therapy Association Combined Sections Meeting. San Antonio, Texas, February 14-18, 2001.
46. Echols K, DeLuca SC, Taub E. Constraint-induced movement therapy in young children: a protocol and outcomes compared to traditional measures. Poster presentation at the American Physical Therapy Association Combined Sections Meeting, San Antonio, Texas, February 14-18, 2001.
47. Taub E, DeLuca S: Constraint-induced (CI) therapy: applied to pediatric patients with neuromotor disorders. Presented at the American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine. New Orleans, September 11-14, 2002.
48. Candia V, Elbert T, Altenmüller E, et al. A constraint-induced movement therapy for focal hand dystonia in musicians. Lancet 1999;42:353.
49. Candia V, Taub E, Rau H, et al. Sensory motor retuning (SMR): a behavioral treatment for focal hand dystonia of pianists and guitarists. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, in press.
50. Weiss T, Miltner WHR, Adler T, et al. Decrease in phantom limb pain associated with prosthesis-induced increased use of an amputation stump. Neurosci Lett 1999;272:131-4.
51. Pulvermüller F, Genkinger B, Elbert T, et al. Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke 2001;32:1621-6.
52. Taub E, Uswatte G, King DK, et al. CI therapy extended from upper to lower extremity in stroke patients. Neuroscience Abstracts 1999;25:320.
53. Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark V, et al. CI therapy extended from stroke to spinal cord injured patients. Neuroscience Abstracts 2000;26:544.
54. Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark V, et al. CI therapy for lower extremities extended from CNS damage to fractured hip. Neuroscience Abstracts 2001;27:2208.
55. Elbert T, Candia V, Altenmüller E, et al. Alteration of digital representations in somatosensory cortex in focal hand dystonia. Neuroreport 1998;9:3571-5.
56. Bara-Jiminez W, Catalan MJ, Hallett M, et al. Abnormal somatosensory homunculus in dystonia of the hand. Ann Neurol 1998;44:828-31.
57. Byl NN, Merzenich MM, Cheung S, et al. A primate model for studying focal hand dystonia and repetitive strain injury: effects on the primary somatosensory cortex. Phys Ther 1997;77:269-84.
58. Birbaumer NP, Lutzenberger W, Montoya P, et al. Effects of regional anesthesia on phantom limb pain are mirrored in changes in cortical reorganization. J Neurosci 1997; 17:5503-8.