Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 1.5 tesla: Does a blood-pool contrast agent improve diagnostic accuracy?

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 152-159

  Wagner, Moritz ^a   Rösler, Roberta ^a   Lembcke, Alexander ^a   Butler, Craig ^b   Dewey, Marc ^a   Laule, Michael ^a   Huppertz, Alexander ^a   Schwenke, Carsten ^c   Warmuth, Carsten ^a   Rief, Matthias ^a   Hamm, Bernd ^a   Taupitz, Matthias ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c SCO:SSiS Statistical Consulting   (Germany)

Author keywords

blood pool; contrast agent; coronary angiography; gadofosveset trisodium; humans; magnetic resonance

Indexed keywords

GADOFOSVESET;

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSENSUS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY ARTERY CIRCUMFLEX BRANCH; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; KAPPA STATISTICS; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; LEFT CORONARY ARTERY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STEADY STATE; WHOLE HEART CORONARY MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY;

EID: 79751538916     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181fac6ef     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 1999;99:2345-2357.
2. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Busch S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:684-691. (Pubitemid 351325900)
3. Mowatt G, Cook JA, Hillis GS, et al. 64-slice computed tomography angiog-raphy in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2008;94:1386-1393.
4. Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M, et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiog-raphy for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1863-1869. (Pubitemid 33716560)
5. Sakuma H, Ichikawa Y, Chino S, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenosis with whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1946-1950. (Pubitemid 44738453)
6. Manning WJ, Li W, Edelman RR. A preliminary report comparing magnetic resonance coronary angiography with conventional angiography. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:828-832. (Pubitemid 23084336)
7. Kefer J, Coche E, Legros G, et al. Head-to-head comparison of three-dimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:92-100. (Pubitemid 40905135)
8. Dewey M, Teige F, Schnapauff D, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:407-415. (Pubitemid 46768571)
9. Schuetz GM, Zacharopoulou NM, Schlattmann P, et al. Meta-analysis: noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:167-177.
10. Weber OM, Martin AJ, Higgins CB. Whole-heart steady-state free precession coronary artery magnetic resonance angiography. Magn Reson Med. 2003; 50:1223-1228. (Pubitemid 37494023)
11. Deshpande VS, Shea SM, Laub G, et al. 3D magnetization-prepared true-FISP: a new technique for imaging coronary arteries. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46:494-502. (Pubitemid 32831324)
12. Maintz D, Aepfelbacher FC, Kissinger KV, et al. Coronary MR angiography: comparison of quantitative and qualitative data from four techniques. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:515-521. (Pubitemid 38116604)
13. Shea SM, Deshpande VS, Chung YC, et al. Three-dimensional true-FISP imaging of the coronary arteries: improved contrast with T2-preparation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;15:597-602. (Pubitemid 34461556)
14. Spuentrup E, Bornert P, Botnar RM, et al. Navigator-gated free-breathing three-dimensional balanced fast field echo (TrueFISP) coronary magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol. 2002;37:637-642. (Pubitemid 35231699)
15. Fink C, Goyen M, Lotz J. Magnetic resonance angiography with blood-pool contrast agents: future applications. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(suppl 2):38-44.
16. Lauffer RB, Parmelee DJ, Dunham SU, et al. MS-325: albumintargeted contrast agent for MR angiography. Radiology. 1998;207:529-538. (Pubitemid 28259074)
17. Bremerich J, Bilecen D, Reimer P. MR angiography with blood pool contrast agents. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:3017-3024. (Pubitemid 350142325)
18. Scheffler K, Hennig J. T1 quantification with inversion recovery TrueFISP. Magn Reson Med. 2001;45:720-723.
19. van der Zwet PM, Reiber JH. A new approach for the quantification of complex lesion morphology: the gradient field transform; basic principles and validation results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:216-224. (Pubitemid 24202801)
20. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1975;51:5-40.
21. Dewey M, Teige F, Schnapauff D, et al. Combination of free-breathing and breathhold steady-state free precession magnetic resonance angiography for detection of coronary artery stenoses. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;23:674-681.
22. Yang Q, Li K, Liu X, et al. Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0-T: a comparative study with X-ray angiography in a single center. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:69-76.
23. Bluemke DA, Achenbach S, Budoff M, et al. Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography: a scientific statement for the American heart association committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention of the council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and the councils on clinical cardiology and cardiovascular disease in the young. Circulation. 2008;118:586-606.
24. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ, et al. Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography. Am Heart J. 2006;151:404-411. (Pubitemid 43144743)
25. Jahnke C, Paetsch I, Nehrke K, et al. Rapid and complete coronary arterial tree visualization with magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility and diagnostic performance. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:2313-2319. (Pubitemid 41541397)
26. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1475-1497.
27. Port M, Corot C, Violas X, et al. How to compare the efficiency of albumin-bound and nonalbumin-bound contrast agents in vivo: the concept of dynamic relaxivity. Invest Radiol. 2005;40:565-573. (Pubitemid 41208633)
28. Kelle S, Thouet T, Tangcharoen T, et al. Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography with MS-325 (Gadofosveset). Med Sci Monit. 2007; 13:469-474.
29. Stuber M, Botnar RM, Danias PG, et al. Contrast agent-enhanced, free-breathing, three-dimensional coronary magnetic resonance angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:790-799. (Pubitemid 29519783)
30. Goyen M, Shamsi K, Schoenberg SO. Vasovist-enhanced MR angiography. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(suppl 2):9-14.
31. Wagner M, Rief M, Asbach P, et al. Gadofosveset trisodium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the left atrium-A feasibility study. Eur J Radiol. 2010;75:166-172.
32. Prompona M, Cyran C, Nikolaou K, et al. Contrast-enhanced whole-heart MR coronary angiography at 3.0 T using the intravascular contrast agent gado-fosveset. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:369-374.
33. Pflederer T, Schmid M, Ropers D, et al. Interobserver variability of 64-slice computed tomography for the quantification of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque. Rofo. 2007;179:953-957. (Pubitemid 47596420)
34. Hackenbroch M, Nehrke K, Gieseke J, et al. 3D motion adapted gating (3D MAG): a new navigator technique for accelerated acquisition of free breathing navigator gated 3D coronary MR-angiography. Eur Radiol. 2005;15: 1598-1606. (Pubitemid 41102354)
35. Jahnke C, Nehrke K, Paetsch I, et al. Improved bulk myocardial motion suppression for navigator-gated coronary magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:780-786. (Pubitemid 350194605)
36. Tangcharoen T, Jahnke C, Koehler U, et al. Impact of heart rate variability in patients with normal sinus rhythm on image quality in coronary magnetic angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28:74-79. (Pubitemid 351956468)
37. Schar M, Kozerke S, Fischer SE, et al. Cardiac SSFP imaging at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51:799-806. (Pubitemid 38420458)
38. Stuber M, Botnar RM, Fischer SE, et al. Preliminary report on in vivo coronary MRA at 3 Tesla in humans. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48:425-429. (Pubitemid 34951319)
39. Liu X, Bi X, Huang J, et al. Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 T: comparison with steady-state free precession technique at 1.5 T. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:663-668.
40. Bhat H, Yang Q, Zuehlsdorff S, et al. Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3 T using interleaved echo planar imaging. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:458-464.