Comparison of 3D free-breathing coronary MR angiography and 64-MDCT angiography for detection of coronary stenosis in patients with high calcium scores

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 189, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1326-1332

  Liu, Xin ^a   Zhao, Xihai ^b   Huang, Jie ^a   Francois, Christopher J ^a   Tuite, David ^a   Bi, Xiaoming ^c   Li, Debiao ^a,d   Carr, James C ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CHINESE PLA GENERAL HOSPITAL   (China)

^c SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

^d Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

Coronary angiography; Coronary arteries; Coronary artery disease; Coronary artery stenosis; MDCT angiography; MR angiography

Indexed keywords

BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; GLYCERYL TRINITRATE; IOHEXOL; METOPROLOL;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY CALCIFICATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTIFACTS; CALCINOSIS; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESPIRATORY MECHANICS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 36448936032     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2805     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. American Heart Association, American Stroke Association. 2002 heart and stroke statistical update. Dallas, TX: The American Heart Association, 2002
2. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ, et al. Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography. Am Heart J 2006; 151:404-411
3. Gerber BL, Coche E, Pasquet A, et al. Coronary artery stenosis: direct comparison of four-section multi-detector row CT and 3D navigator MR imaging for detection-initial results. Radiology 2005; 234:98-108
4. Kefer J, Coche E, Legros G, et al. Head-to-head comparison of three-dimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:92-100
5. Dewey M, Teige F, Schnapauff D, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145:407-415
6. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005; 112:2318-2323
7. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:147-154
8. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:552-557
9. Ong TK, Chin SP, Liew CK, et al. Accuracy of 64-row multidetector computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease in 134 symptomatic patients: influence of calcification. Am Heart J 2006; 151:1323.e1-e6
10. Wang L, Jerosch-Herold M, Jacobs DR, Shahar E, Detrano R, Folsom AR. Coronary artery calcification and myocardial perfusion in asymptomatic adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48:1018-1026
11. Ramakrishna G, Breen JF, Mulvagh SL, McCully RB, Pellikka PA. Relationship between coronary artery calcification detected by electron-beam computed tomography and abnormal stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48:2125-2131
12. Dewey M, Teige F, Schnapauff D, et al. Combination of free-breathing and breathhold steady-state free precession magnetic resonance angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 23:674-681
13. Sakuma H, Ichikawa Y, Chino S, Hirano T, Makino K, Takeda K. Detection of coronary artery stenosis with whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48:1946-1950
14. Cheng L, Gao Y, Guaricci AI, et al. Breath-hold 3D steady-state free precession coronary MRA compared with conventional X-ray coronary angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 23:669-673
15. Bi X, Deshpande V, Carr J, Li D. Coronary artery magnetic resonance angiography (MRA): a comparison between the whole-heart and volume-targeted methods using a T2-prepared SSFP sequence. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006; 8:703-707
16. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hindner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 15:827-832
17. Rumberger JA, Brundage BH, Rader DJ, Kondos G. Electron beam computed tomographic coronary calcium scanning: a review and guidelines for use in asymptomatic persons. Mayo Clin Proc 1999; 74:243-252
18. Kajinami K, Seki H, Takekoshi N, Mabuchi H. Coronary calcification and coronary atherosclerosis: site by site comparative morphologic study of electron beam computed tomography and coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29:1549-1556
19. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975; 51[suppl 4]:5-40
20. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al.; Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. AJR 2003; 181:51-55
21. Mason SJ, Graham NE. Areas beneath the relative operating characteristics (ROC) and relative operating levels (ROL) curves: statistical significance and interpretation. QJR Meteorol Soc 2002; 128:2145-2166
22. Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiologic ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989; 24:234-235
23. Beiden SV, Wagner RF, Campbell G. Components-of-variance models and multiple-bootstrap experiments: an alternative method for randomeffects, receiver operating characteristic analysis. Acad Radiol 2000; 7:341-349
24. Dwyer AJ. Matchmaking and McNemar in the comparison of diagnostic modalities. Radiology 1991; 178:328-330
25. Burke AP, Weber DK, Kolodgie FD, Farb A, Taylor AJ, Virmani R. Pathophysiology of calcium deposition in coronary arteries. Herz 2001; 26:239-244
26. Yang CW, Carr JC, Francois CJ, et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography using magnetization-prepared contrast-enhanced breath-hold volume-targeted imaging. Invest Radiol 2006; 41:639-644
27. Morgan-Hughes GJ, Roobottom CA, Owens PE, Marshall AJ. Highly accurate coronary angiography with submillimetre, 16 slice computed tomography. Heart 2005; 91:308-313
28. Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury RC, et al. Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary disease: patient- versus segment-based analysis. Circulation 2004; 110:2638-2643
29. Heuschmid M, Kuettner A, Schroeder S, et al. ECG-gated 16-MDCT of the coronary arteries: assessment of image quality and accuracy in detecting stenoses. AJR 2005; 184:1413-1419
30. Cordeiro MA, Miller JM, Schmidt A, et al. Non-invasive half millimetre 32 detector row computed tomography angiography accurately excludes significant stenoses in patients with advanced coronary artery disease and high calcium scores. Heart 2006; 92:589-597