Orchestrating learning activities on the social and the cognitive level to foster CSCL

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn 8, Issue PART 1, 2007, Pages 36-45

  Weinberger, Armin ^a   Clark, Douglas ^b   Dillenbourg, Pierre ^c   Diziol, Dejana ^d   Sampson, Victor ^b   Stegmann, Karsten ^a   Rummel, Nikol ^d   Hong, Fabrice ^c   Spada, Hans ^d   McLaren, Bruce ^e   Brahm, Taiga ^f   Fischer, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c EPFL   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^e Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ST GALLEN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE LEVELS; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COLLABORATIVE PROCESS; EFFECTIVE MECHANISMS; LEARNING ACTIVITY; SOCIOCOGNITIVE;

MAMMALS;

EID: 84861027318     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167-207.
2. Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (Eds.). (2003). Arguing to learn. Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. Baker, M. (2003). Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (Vol. 1, pp. 1-25). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4. Berg, K. F. (1993). Structured cooperative learning and achievement in a high school mathematics class. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
5. Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. (2006, April). Characteristics of Students' Argumentation Practices When Supported by Online Personally-Seeded Discussions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, California.
6. Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. (2007). Personally-seeded discussions to scaffold online argumentation. To be published in 2007 in the International Journal of Science Education.
7. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61-91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
8. Dillenbourg, P., & Fischer, F. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: The basics.
9. Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, H. Mandl, J. Haake & I. Kollar (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge - cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 275-301). New York: Springer.
10. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-313.
11. Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. (Eds.). (2007). Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning. New York: Springer.
12. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
13. Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, P., et al. (in press). Specifying Computer-Supported Collaboration Scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.
14. Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30-43.
15. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts - a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159-185.
16. Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(3), 319-337.
17. Leitão, S. (2000). The potential of argument in knowledge building. Human Development, 43, 332-360.
18. Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to Collaborate: An Instructional Approach to Promoting Collaborative Problem Solving in Computer-Mediated Settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201-241.
19. Slavin, R. E. (1993). Synthesis of research on cooperative learning. In A. E. Woolfolk (Ed.), Readings & cases in educational psychology (pp. 170-178). Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
20. Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). Collaborative argumentation and cognitive processing - An empirical study in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment.
21. Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Jochems, W. M. G., & Broers, N. J. (2004). The effects of functional roles on group efficiency: Using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research, 35(2), 195-229.
22. Teasley, S. D. (1995). The role of talk in children's peer collaborations. Developmental Psychology, 31(2), 207-220.
23. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46, 71-95.
25. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.