An exploration of gender diversity in engineering programs: A curriculum and instructionbased perspective

Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 55-78

  Knight, David B ^a   Lattuca, Lisa R ^b   Yin, Alexander ^a   Kremer, Gul ^c   York, Travis ^a   Ro, Hyun Kyoung ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate; Curricular emphases; Disciplinary differences; Educational experiences; Pedagogy; Recruitment retention of women; Women in engineering

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860993143     PISSN: 10728325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2012003702     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Abu El-Haj, T.R.A., Practicing for equity from the standpoint of the particular: Exploring the work of one urban teacher network, Teach. Coll. Rec., vol. 105, pp. 817-845, 2003.
2. Amelink, C.T. and Creamer, E.G., Gender differences in elements of the undergraduate experience that influence satisfaction with the engineering major and the intent to pursue engineering as a career, J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 81-92, 2010.
3. Ancis, J.R., Sedlacek, W.E., and Mohr, J.J., Student perceptions of the campus cultural climate by race, J. Couns. Devel., vol. 78, pp. 180-185, 2000.
4. Armor, D.J., Theta Reliability and Factor Scaling, in H. Costner, ed., Sociological Methodology: 1973-1974, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 17-50, 1974.
5. Astin, A.W., What Matters in College: Four Critical Years Revisited, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1993.
6. Astin, A.W. and Astin, H.S., Undergraduate Science Education: The Impact of Different College Environments on the Educational Pipeline in the Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Graduate School of Education, Higher Education Research Institution, 1993.
7. Barber, L.A., US Women in science and engineering, 1960-1990: Progress toward equity?, J. Higher Educ., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 213-234, 1995.
8. Baruch, Y., Response rate in academic studies-A comparative analysis, Hum. Relat., vol. 52, pp. 421-438, 1999.
9. Baxter Magolda, M.B., Gender differences in cognitive development: An analysis of cognitive complexity and learning styles, J. Coll. Stud. Devel., vol. 30, no.3, pp. 213-220, 1989.
10. Baxter Magolda, M.B., Learning and gender: Complexity and possibility, Higher Educ., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 351-355, 1998.
11. Belenky, M.F., Clinchy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R., and Tarule, J.M., Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice and Mind, Tenth Anniversary edition, Basic Books, New York, 1998.
12. Borrego, M.J., Padilla, M.A., Zhang, G., Ohland, M.W., and Anderson, T.J., Graduation rates, gradepoint average, and changes of major of female and minority students entering engineering, Proc. 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Educ. Conf., 2005. October 19-22, Indianapolis, IN.
13. Bradburn, E.M., Engineering gender roles: A self-efficacy model of occupational choice and persistence, Diss. Abstr. Intl. Sec. A: Hum. Soc. Sci., vol. 55, no. 7, p. 2146A, 1995.
14. Brainard, S.G., Student ownership: The key to successful intervention programs, Initiatives, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 23-30, 1993.
15. Brainard, S.G. and Carlin, L., A longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science, Proc. 27th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Educ. Conf., 1997. November 5-8, Pittsburgh, PA.
16. Brotman, J.S. and Moore, F.M., Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature, J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 971-1002, 2008.
17. Busch-Vishniac, I.J. and Jarosz, J.P., Can diversity in the undergraduate engineering population be enhanced through curricular change?, J. Wom. Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 255-281, 2004.
18. Camacho, M.M., Lord, S.M., Brawner, C.E., and Ohland, M.W., Climate in undergraduate engineering education from 1995 to 2009, Proc. 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Educ. Conf., 2010. October 27-30, Washington, DC.
19. Campbell, P.B., Jolly, E., Hoey, L., and Perlman, L.K., Upping the numbers: Using research based decision making to increase diversity in the quantitative disciplines, GE Foundation Report, 2002.
20. Cebula, R.J. and Lopes, J., Determinants of student choice of undergraduate major field, Am. Educ. Res. J., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 303-312, 1982.
21. Chang, M.J., Does racial diversity matter? The educational impact of a racially diverse undergraduate population, J. Coll. Stud. Devel., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 377-395, 1999.
22. Chang, M.J., The Positive Educational Effects of Racial Diversity on Campus, in G. Orfield and M. Kurlaender, eds., Diversity Challenged: Evidence on the Impact of Affirmative Action, The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, pp. 175-186, 2001.
23. Davies, S. and Guppy, N., Fields of study, college selectivity, and student inequalities in higher education, Social Forces, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 1415-1436, 1997.
24. De Courten-Myers, G.M., The human cerebral cortex: Gender differences in structure and function, J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 217-226, 1999.
25. Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., and Rubin, D.B., Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm, J. R. Stat. Soc., Ser. B, vol. 39, pp. 1-38, 1977.
26. Dickie, L.O., Dedic, H., Rosenfield, S., Rosenfield, E., and Simon, R.A., Success and persistence in science: The influence of classroom climate, Arxiv preprint physics/0610243, 2006.
27. Donald, J.G., Learning to Think: Disciplinary Perspectives, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 2002.
28. Farrell, E., Engineering a warmer welcome for female students, Leadership Manage. Eng., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 19-22, 2002.
29. Felder, R.M., Felder, G.N., Mauney, M., Hamrin Jr., C.E., and Dietz, E.J., A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention. III. Gender differences in student performance and attitudes, J. Eng. Educ., vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 151-174, 2005.
30. Fouad, N.A. and Singh, R., Stemming the Tide: Why Women Leave Engineering, The University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 2011.
31. Frehill, L., Javurek-Humig, A., and Jesser-Cannavale, C., Women in engineering: A review of the 2005 literature, Mag. Soc. Wom. Eng., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 34-63, 2006.
32. Graham, J.W., Missing data: Making it work in the real world, Ann. Rev. Psych., vol. 60, pp. 549-576, 2009.
33. Haines, V.A., Wallace, J.E., and Cannon, M.E., Exploring the gender gap in engineering: A re-specification and test of the hypothesis of cumulative advantages and disadvantages, J. Eng. Educ., vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 677-684, 2001.
34. Hartman, H. and Hartman, M., Leaving engineering: Lessons from Rowan University's College of Engineering, J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 49-61, 2006.
35. Haüssler, P. and Hoffmann, L., An intervention study to enhance girls' interest, self-concept, and achievement in physics classes, J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 870-888, 2002.
36. Hill, C., Corbett, C., and St. Rose, A., Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, American Association of University Women, Washington, DC, 2010.
37. Hilton, T.L., Hsia, J., Solorzano, D.G., and Burton, N.L., Persistence in Science of High-ability Minority Students, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ, 1989.
38. Hughes, J.W., Perceived gender interaction and course confidence among undergraduate science, mathematics, and technology majors, J. Wom. Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 155-167, 2000.
39. Hutchison, M.A., Follman, D.K., Sumpter, M., and Bodner, G.M., Factors influencing the self-efficacy beliefs of first-year engineering students, J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 39-47, 2006.
40. Jackson, L.A., Gardner, P.D., and Sullivan, L.A., Engineering persistence: Past, present, and future factors and gender differences, Higher Educ, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 227-246, 1993.
41. Jacobs, J.A., The sex-segregation of fields of study: Trends during the college years, J. Higher Educ., vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 134-154, 1986.
42. Jacobs, J.A., Gender and academic specialties: Trends among recipients of college degrees in the 1980s, Sociol. Educ., vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 81-98, 1995.
43. Jacobs, J.E. and Rossi Becker, J., Creating a gender-equitable multicultural classroom using feminist pedagogy, in J. Trentacosta and M. Kenney, eds., Multicultural and Gender Equity in the Mathematics Classroom: The Gift of Diversity (1997 Yearbook), National Council of Teachers in Mathematics, Reston, VA, pp. 107-114, 1997.
44. Jenkins, M. and Keim, R.G., Gender trends in engineering education, Proc. 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Educ. Conf., 2004. October 20-23, Savannah, GA.
45. Jessup, E., Sumner, T., and Barker, L., Report from the trenches: Implementing curriculum to promote the participation of women in computer science, J. Wom. Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 11, pp. 273-294, 2005.
46. Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T., The socialization and achievement crisis: Are cooperative learning experiences the solution?, Appl. Soc. Psychol. Ann., vol. 4, pp. 119-164, 1983.
47. Kadlowec, J., Bhatia, K., Chandrupatla, T.R., Chen, J.C., Constans, E., and Hartman, H., Design integrated in the mechanical engineering curriculum: Assessment of the engineering clinics, J. Mech. Des., vol. 129, no. 7, pp. 682-691, 2007.
48. Kardash, C.M. and Wallace, M. L, The perceptions of science classes survey: What undergraduate science reform efforts really need to address, J. Educ. Psych., vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 199-210, 2001.
49. Knight, D.B., Mappen, E.F., and Knight, S.L., A review of the literature on increasing the representation of women undergraduates in STEM disciplines through civic engagement pedagogies, Sci. Educ. Civic Engage., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 36-47, 2011.
50. Kuh, G.D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J.H., Whitt, E.J., et al., Student Success in College: Creating Conditions that Matter, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 2005.
51. Lattuca, L.R., Interdisciplinary competence: A learning goal for students-and faculty?, Keynote Address, 23rd Annual Teaching and Learning Innovations Conf., University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 2010.
52. Lattuca, L.R. and Stark, J.S., Shaping the College Curriculum: Academic Plans in Context, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 2009.
53. Lattuca, L.R., Terenzini, P.T., Harper, B.J., and Yin, A.C., Academic environments in detail: Holland's theory at the subdiscipline level, Res. Higher Educ., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 21-39, 2010.
54. Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D., Sheu, H-B, Schmidt, J., Brenner, B.R., Gloster, C.S., Wilkins, G., Schmidt, L.C., Lyons, H., and Treistman, D., Social cognitive predictors of academic interests and goals in engineering: Utility for women and students at historically black universities, J. Couns. Psychol., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 84-92, 2005.
55. Leppel, K., Williams, M.L., and Waldauer, C., The impact of parental occupation and socioeconomic status on choice of college major, J. Fam. Econ. Iss., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 373-394, 2001.
56. Lord, S. M, Brawner, D.E., Camacho, M.M., Layton, R. A, Ohland, M.W., and Wasburn, M.H., Engineering Students' Disciplinary Choices: Do Race and Gender Matter?, Proc. 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Educ. Conf., 2009. October 18-21, San Antonio, TX.
57. Marra, R. and Bogue, B., Engineering classroom environments: Examining differences by gender and departments, Proc. 115th Amer. Soc. Eng. Educ. Conf., 2008. June 22-24, Pittsburgh, PA.
58. Meinholdt, C. and Murray, S.L., Why aren't there more women engineers?, J. Wom. Minor. Eng., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 239-263, 1999.
59. Milem, J. and Hakuta, K., The benefits of racial and ethnic diversity in higher education, in D. Wilds, ed., Minorities in Higher Education: Seventeenth Annual Status Report, American Council on Education, Washington, DC, pp. 39-67, 2000.
60. National Academy of Sciences, Committee on Science, Engineering & Public Policy, Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007.
61. National Research Council, Committee on Women in Science and Engineering, Women in Science and Engineering: Increasing Their Numbers in the 1990s, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1991.
62. National Research Council, Committee on Women in Science and Engineering, To Recruit and Advance: Women Students and Faculty in Science and Engineering, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2006.
63. National Science Board, Higher education in science and engineering, in Science and Engineering Indicators: 2010, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, 2010.
64. Nora, A., Cabrera, A., Hagedom, L.S., and Pascarella, E., Differential impacts of academic and social experiences on college-related behavioral outcomes across different ethnic and gender groups at four-year institutions, Res. Higher Educ., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 427-451, 1996.
65. Obama, B., State of the Union Address, United States Congress, United States Capitol, Washington, DC, 2011.
66. Ogunfunmi, T., Impact and results of minority engineering student advising and mentoring for career advancement, Proc. 115th Amer. Soc. Eng. Educ. Conf., 2008. June 22-25, Pittsburgh, PA.
67. Pajares, F., Self-efficacy information, in T. Urden and F. Pajares, eds., Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC, pp. 339-367, 2007.
68. Pascarella, E.T. and Terenzini, P.T., How College Affects Students, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 2005.
69. Pawley, A.L., The feminist engineering classroom: A vision for future educational innovations, Proc. 111th Amer. Soc. Eng. Educ. Conf., 2004. June 20-23, Salt Lake City, UT.
70. Porter, S.R. and Umbach, P.D., What works best? Collecting alumni data with multiple technologies, Ann. Conf. of the Assoc. for Inst. Res., 2001. June 3-6, Long Beach, CA.
71. Porter, S.R. and Umbach, P.D., Student survey response rates across institutions: Why do they vary?, Res. Higher Educ., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 229-247, 2006.
72. Schunk, D.H. and Pajares, F., The Development of Academic Self-efficacy, Academic Press, San Diego, 2002.
73. Seymour, E., The loss of women from science, mathematics, and engineering undergraduate majors: An explanatory account, Sci. Educ., vol. 79, pp. 437-473, 1995.
74. Seymour, E., Tracking the processes of change in US undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology, Sci. Educ., vol. 86, pp. 79-105, 2001.
75. Seymour, E. and Hewitt, N., Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1997.
76. Sheppard, S., Gilmartin, S., Chen, H.L., Donaldson, K., Lichtenstein, G., Eriş, Ö., Lande, M., and Toye, G., Exploring the Engineering Student Experience: Findings from the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey (APPLES) (CAEE-TR-10-01), Center for the Advancement for Engineering Education, Seattle, WA, 2010, Retrieved August 31, 2011, from http://www.engr.washington.edu/ caee/APPLES_report.html.
77. Simpson, J.C., Segregated by subject: Racial differences in the factors influencing academic major between European Americans, Asian Americans, and African, Hispanic, and Native Americans, J. Higher Educ., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 63-100, 2001.
78. Smart, J.C., Feldman, K.A., and Ethington, C.A., Academic Disciplines: Holland's Theory and the Study of College Students and Faculty, Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville, TN, 2000.
79. Stake, J.E. and Nickens, S.D., Adolescent girls' and boys' science peer relationships and perceptions of the possible self as scientist, Sex Roles, vol. 52, pp. 1-12, 2005.
80. Takahira, S., Goodings, D.J., and Byrnes, J., Retention and performance of male and female engineering students: An examination of academic and environmental variables, J. Am. Soc. Eng. Educ., vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 397-404, 1998.
81. Thomas, G.E., College major and career inequality: Implications for black students, J. Negro Educ., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 537-547, 1985.
82. Thompson, J.J. and Windschitl, M., Failing girls: Understanding connections among identity negotiation, personal relevance, and engagement in science learning from underachieving girls, J. Wom. Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-26, 2005.
83. Tobias, S., They're Not Dumb, They're Different: Stalking the Second Tier, Research Corporation, Tucson, AZ, 1990.
84. US Department of Education, A Test of Leadership: Charting the Future of US Higher Education, Education Publications Center, Washington, DC, 2006.
85. US Government Accountability Office, Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Trends and the Role of Federal Programs, US Government, Washington, DC, 2006.
86. Valian, V., Beyond gender schemas: Improving the advancement of women in academia, Hypatia, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 198-213, 2005.
87. Van Horn, P.S., Green, K.E., and Martinussen, M., Survey response rates and survey administration in counseling and clinical psychology: A meta-analysis, Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 69, pp. 389-403, 2009.
88. Ware, N.C., Steckler, N.A., and Leserman, J., Undergraduate women: Who chooses a science major?, J. Higher Educ., vol. 56, pp. 73-84, 1985.
89. Whitt, E.J., Pascarella, E.T., Neisheim, B.S.E., Marth, B.P., and Pierson, C.T., Differences between women and men in objectively measured outcomes, and the factors that influence those outcomes, in the first three years of college, J. Coll. Stud. Devel., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 587-610, 2003.
90. Zafar, B., College major choice and the gender gap. Federal Reserve Bank of New York State Reports, 364, 2009, Retrieved August 31, 2011 from www.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/sr364.pdf.
91. Zastavker, Y.V., Ong, M., and Page, L., Women in engineering: Exploring the effects of project-based learning in a first-year undergraduate engineering program, Proc. 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Educ. Conf., 2006. October 27-31, San Diego, CA.