The perceptions of science classes survey: What undergraduate science reform efforts really need to address

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 199-210

  Kardash, CarolAnne M ^a   Wallace, Michael L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035581514     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.199     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Adair, R. K. (1991). Using quantitative measures to predict persistence in the natural sciences. College and University, 66, 73-79.
2. Bae, Y., & Smith, T. M. (1996). Issues in focus: Women in mathematics and science. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
3. Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1983). The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 23, 329-345.
4. Chipman, S. F., & Thomas, V. G. (1987). The participation of women and minorities in mathematical, scientific, and technical fields. Review of Research in Higher Education, 14, 387-430.
5. Ferreira, M. M. (1998, April). Gender issues related to student attrition from two graduate science departments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
6. Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
7. Heller, J. F., Puff, C. R., & Mills, C. J. (1985). Assessment of the chilly college climate for women. Journal of Higher Education, 56, 446-461.
8. Higher Education Research Institute. (1996). The American freshman: National norms for Fall, 1996. Los Angeles: University of California, Graduate School of Education and Information Studies.
9. Kardash, C. M. (1999). Students' perceptions of learning outcomes in an inquiry-driven, introductory-level, undergraduate science class. Unpublished manuscript.
10. Kardash, C. M. (2000). Evaluation of an undergraduate research expertence: Perceptions of undergraduate interns and their faculty mentors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 191-201.
11. Leslie, L. L., McClure, G. T., & Oaxaca, R. L. (1998). Women and minorities in science and engineering: A life sequence analysis. Journal of Higher Education, 69, 250-276.
12. Linn, M. C., & Hyde, J. S. (1989). Gender, mathematics, and science. Educational Researcher, 18, 17-19, 22-27.
13. Mannis, J. D., Thomas, N. G., Sloat, B. F., & Davis, C. (1989). An analysis of factors affecting choices of majors in science, mathematics, and engineering at the University of Michigan (Research Report No. 23). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Education of Women.
14. National Research Council. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
15. National Science Foundation. (1996). Shaping the future: New expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology (NSF Publication No. 96-139). Arlington, VA: Author.
16. Pearson, W., Jr., & Fechter, A. (Eds.). (1994). Who will do science? Educating the next generation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17. Peterson, P. (1988). Teachers' and students' cognitional knowledge for classroom teaching and learning. Educational Researcher, 17, 5-14.
18. Rosser, S. V. (1990). Female-friendly science: Applying women's study methods and theories to attract students. New York: Pergamon Press.
19. Seymour, E. (1992). "The problem iceberg" in science, mathematics, and engineering education: Student explanations for high attrition rates. Journal of College Science Teaching, 21, 230-238.
20. Seymour, E. (1995). The loss of women from science, mathematics, and engineering undergraduate majors: An explanatory account. Science Education, 79, 437-473.
21. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
22. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
23. SPSS, Inc. (1998). SPSS: SPSS advanced statistics 9.0. Chicago, IL: Author.
24. Strenta, A. C., Elliott, R., Adair, R., Matier, M., & Scott, J. (1994). Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions. Research in Higher Education, 35, 513-547.
25. Stumpf, H., & Stanley, J. (1996). Gender related differences on the College Board's Advanced Placement and Achievement tests, 1982-1992. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 353-364.
26. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarpersCollins College Publishers.
27. Tobias, S. (1990). They're not dumb, they're different: Stalking the second tier. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.
28. Ulku-Steiner, B., Kurtz-Costes, B., & Kinlaw, C. R. (2000). Doctoral student experiences in gender-balanced and male-dominated graduate programs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 296-307.
29. Ware, N. C., & Dill, D. (1986, April). Persistence in science among mathematically able male and female college students with pre-college plans for a scientific major. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California.