Modeling and simulation methods for design of engineering systems

Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 84-91

  Sinha, Rajarishi ^a   Paredis, Christiaan J J ^b   Liang, Vei Chung ^a   Khosla, Pradeep K ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860775864     PISSN: 15309827     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.1344877     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Ascher, U. M. and Petzold, L. R., 1998, Computer Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations and Differential-Algebraic Equations, Siam. Philadelphia. Pennsylvania.
2. Zeigler, B. P., Praehofer, H., and Kim, T. G., 2000, Theory of Modeling and Simulation: Integrating Discrete Event and Continuous Complex Dynamic Systems, 2nd ed. Academic Press.
3. Fishwick, P. A., 1998. “A Taxonomy for Simulation Modeling Based on Programming Language Principles.” HE Transactions. 30. pp. 811-20.
4. Histand, M. B., and Alciatore, D. G., 1998, Introduction to Mechatronics and Measurement Systems, McGraw-Hill, Boston.
5. Seshu, S., and Reed, M. B., 1961, Linear Graphs and Electrical Networks, Addison-Wesley, Reading. Massachusetts.
6. Triengo, M. J. L., and Bos, A. M., 1985. “Modeling the Dynamics and Kinematics of Mechanical Systems with Multibond Graphs. “ J. Franklin Inst., 319. pp. 37-50.
7. Paynter, H. M., 1961, Analysis and Design of Engineering Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge. MA.
8. Rosenberg, R. C., and Kamopp, D. C., 1983, Introduction to Physical System Dynamics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
9. Edstrom, K., 1999, “Simulation of Newton’s Pendulum Using Switched Bond Graphs,” 1999 Western MultiConference, San Francisco. California.
10. Ferris, J. B., and Stein, J. L., 1995, “Development of Proper Models of Hybrid Systems: A Bond Graph Formulation.” International Conference on Bond Graph Modeling and Simulation, Las Vegas, Nevada.
11. Breunese, A. P. J., and Broenink, J. F., 1997, “Modeling Mechatronic Systems Using the SIDOPS+ Language. “ ICBGM ‘97. Phoenix. AZ, pp. 301-306.
12. Trent, H. M., 1955, “Isomorphisms between Oriented Linear Graphs and Lumped Physical Systems,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 27, pp. 500-527.
13. Branin, F. H., 1966, “The Algebraic-Topological Basis for Network Analogies and the Vector Calculus.” Symposium on Generalized Networks, Brooklyn. New York, pp. 453-491.
14. Durfee, W. K., Wall, W. B., Rowell, D., and Abbott, F. K., 1991, “Interactive Software for Dynamic System Modeling Using Linear Graphs,” IEEE Control Syst. Mag., 11, pp. 60-66.
15. McPhee, J. J., 1996, “On the Use of Linear Graph Theory in Multibody System Dynamics,” Nonlinear Dyn., 9, pp. 73-90.
16. Baciu, G., and Kesavan, H. K., 1997, “From Particle-Mass to Multibody Systems: Graph-Theoretic Modeling,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 27, pp. 244-250.
17. Muegge, B. J., 1996, “Graph-Theoretic Modeling and Simulation of Planar Mechatronic Systems,” thesis, University of Waterloo, Systems Design Engineering, Waterloo.
18. Elmqvist, H., Mattsson, S. E., and Otter, M., 1998, “Modelica: The New Object-Oriented Modeling Language,” The 12th European Simulation Multiconference, Manchester, UK.
19. Zeigler, B. P., 1990, Object-Oriented Simulation with Hierarchical, Modular Models, Academic Press.
20. Strauss, J. C., et al., 1967, “The SCI Continuous System Simulation Language (CSSL),” Simulation, 9, pp. 281-303.
21. Maffezzoni, C., and Girelli, R., 1998, “Moses: Modular Modeling of Physical Systems in an Object-Oriented Database,” Math. Comput. Modell., 4, pp. 121-147.
22. Kloas, M., Friesen, V., and Simons, M., 1995, “Smile: A Simulation Environment for Energy Systems,” 5th International IMACS-Symposium on Systems Analysis and Simulation, Berlin, Germany, pp. 503-506.
23. Mattsson, M. E., and Otter, S., 1998, “Physical System Modeling with Modelica,” Control Eng. Prac., 6, pp. 501-510.
24. Piela, P. C., Epperly, T. G., Westerberg, K. M., and Westerberg, A. W., 1991, “ASCEND: An Object Oriented Computer Environment for Modeling and Analysis. 1-the Modeling Language,” Comput. Chem. Eng., 15, pp. 53-72.
25. Cellier, F. E., 1991, Continuous System Modeling, Springer-Verlag.
26. Glynn, P. W., 1992, “A GSMP Formalism for Discrete Event Systems,” in Discrete Event Dynamic Systems: Analyzing Complexity and Performance in the Modern World, Y.-C. Ho, ed., IEEE Press, pp. 11-20.
27. Koenig, H. E., Tokad, Y., Kesavan, H. K., and Hedges, H. G., 1967, Analysis of Discrete Physical Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York.
28. Banks, J., 1998, Handbook of Simulation: Principles, Methodology, Advances, Applications, and Practice, Wiley, New York.
29. Barton, P. I., and Pantelides, C. C., 1994, “Modeling of Combined Discrete/Continuous Processes,” AIChE J., 40, pp. 966-979.
30. Fishwick, P. A., 1997, “Integrating Continuous and Discrete Models with Object Oriented Physical Modeling,” 1997 Western Simulation Multiconference, Phoenix, Arizona.
31. Cellier, F. E., 1996, “Object-Oriented Modeling: Means for Dealing with System Complexity,” 15th Benelux Meeting on Systems and Control, Mierlo, Netherlands.
32. Diaz-Calderon, A., Paredis, C. J. J., and Khosla, P. K., 2000, “Reconfigurable Models: A Modeling Paradigm to Support Simulation-Based Design,” 2000 Summer Computer Simulation Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
33. Zhang, G., and Zeigler, B. P., 1989, “The System Entity Structure: Knowledge Representation for Simulation Modeling and Design,” in Artificial Intelligence, Simulation and Modeling, L. E. Widman, K. A. Loparo, and N. R. Nielsen, eds., Wiley, New York, pp. 47-73.
34. Zeigler, B. P., and Luh, C.-J., 1991, “Model Based Management for Multifacetted Systems,” ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul., 1, pp. 195-218.
35. Anderson, M., 1994, “Object-Oriented Modeling and Simulation of Hybrid Systems,” thesis, Lund Institute of Technology, Department of Automatic Control, Lund, Sweden.
36. Diaz-Calderon, A., Paredis, C. J. J., and Khosla, P. K., 2000, “Automatic Generation of System-Level Dynamic Equations for Mechatronic Systems,” J. Comput.-Aided Mater. Des., 32, pp. 339-354.
37. Kubler, R., and Schiehlen, W., 1999, “Modular Modeling and Simulation of Multibody Systems,” ASME DETC 1999 17th Biennial Conference on Mechanical Vibration and Noise, Las Vegas, Nevada, pp. DETC99/VIB-8227.
38. Otter, M., Elmqvist, H., and Cellier, F., 1996, “Modeling of Multibody Systems with the Object-Oriented Modeling Language Dymola,” Nonlinear Dyn., 9, pp. 91-112.
39. Luckel, J., Junker, F., and Toepper, S., 1993, “Block-Oriented Modeling of Rigid Multibody Systems with Regard to Subsystem Techniques,” in Advanced Multibody System Dynamics Simulation and Software Tools, W. Schiehlen, ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 49-66.
40. Sinha, R., Paredis, C. J. J., and Khosla, P. K., 2000, “Integration of Mechanical CAD and Behavioral Modeling,” IEEE/ACM Workshop on Behavioral Modeling and Simulation, Orlando, FL.
41. Crolla, D. A., Horton, D., and Firth, G. R., 1993, “VDAS-a Toolkit Approach to Vehicle System Simulation,” in Advanced Multibody System Dynamics Simulation and Software Tools, W. Schiehlen, ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 367-372.
42. Wittenburg, J., and Wolz, U., 1985, “MESA VERDE: A Symbolic Program for Nonlinear Articulated-Rigid-Body Dynamics,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Cincinnati, OH.
43. Schiehlen, W., 1997, “Multibody System Dynamics: Roots and Perspectives,” Multibody Syst. Dynam., 1, pp. 149-188.
44. Shabana, A., 1997, “Flexible Multibody Dynamics: Review of Past and Recent Developments,” Multibody Syst. Dynam., 1, pp. 189-222.
45. Gillespie, B., and Colgate, J. E., 1997, “A Survey of Multibody Dynamics for 90 /Vol. 1, MARCH 2001 Transactions of the ASME Virtual Environments,” ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, Dallas, TX.
46. Schwerin, V., 1999, Multibody System Simulation: Numerical Methods, Algorithms, and Software.
47. Richard, M., and Gosselin, C., 1993, “A Survey of Simulation Programs for the Analysis of Mechanical Systems,” Math. Comput. Simul., 35, pp. 103-121.
48. Broenink, J. F., Hilderink, G. H., and Bakkers, A. W. P., 1998, “Conceptual Design for Controller Software of Mechatronic Systems,” 1998 Lancaster International Workshop on Engineering Design, Lancaster, UK, pp. 215-229.
49. Rai, S., and Jackson, W., 1999, “Collaborative Design of Modular Electromechanical Systems with Distributed Controls,” 1999ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, pp. DETC99/DTM-8775.
50. Le, T., Renner, F. M., and Glesner, M., 1997, “Hardware in-the-Loop Simulation-a Rapid Prototyping Approach for Designing Mechatronics Systems,” 8th International Workshop on Rapid System Prototyping (RSP ‘97), Chapel Hill, NC.
51. Boot, R., Richert, J., and Schütte, H., 1998, “Automated Test of ECUs in a Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation Environment,” ASIM 98, Zürich, Switzerland.
52. Tummescheit, H., andEborn, J., 1998, “Design of a Thermo-Hydraulic Model Library in Modelica,” 12th European Simulation Multiconference, Manchaster, UK.
53. Ludecke, A., Trieu, H.-K., Hoffmann, G., Weyand, P., and Pelz G., 1999, “Modeling in Hardware Description Languages for the Simulation of Coupled Fluidic, Thermal and Electrical Effects,” 1999 Behavioral Modeling and Simulation, Orlando, Florida.
54. Pahl, G., and Beitz, W., 1996, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, London, U.K.
55. Shooter, S. B., Keirouz, W., Szykman, S., and Fenves, S. J., 2000, “A Model for the Flow of Design Information,” ASME DETC 2000, 12th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Baltimore, MD, pp. DETC2000/DTM-14550.
56. Sydow, A., 1982, “Hierarchical Concepts in Modeling and Simulation,” in Progress in Modeling and Simulation, F. E. Cellier, ed., Academic Press, London.
57. Shah, J. J., andMantyla, M., 1995, Parametric and Feature-Based CAD/CAM: Concepts, Techniques, Applications, Wiley, New York.
58. Sinha, R., Paredis, C. J. J., Gupta, S. K., and Khosla, P. K., 1998, “Capturing Articulation in Assemblies from Component Geometry,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Atlanta, GA.
59. Daberkow, A., and Kreuzer, E. J., 1999, “An Integrated Approach for Computer-Aided Design in Multibody System Dynamics,” Eng. Comput., 15, pp. 155-170.
60. Lin, S.-T., and Lin, J.-H., 1998, “Computer Aided Dynamic Analysis and Simulation of Multibody Mechanical Systems in AutoCAD,” Simulation, 71, pp. 328-335.
61. Duckering, B. C., 2000, “Behavioral Modeling Technology: Leveraging Engineering Knowledge in CAD Models,” The Fourth IFIP Working Group 5.2 Workshop on Knowledge Intensive CAD (KIC-4), Parma, Italy, pp. 126-135.
62. Qureshi, S., Shah, J., Sunderarajan, K. G., Urban, S., Harter, E., Parazzoli, C., and Bluhm, T., 1997, “A Framework for Providing an Integrated View of Electromechanical Product Design Information,” TeamCAD: GVU/NIST Workshop on Collaborative Design, Atlanta, Georgia.
63. Stein, J. L., and Louca, L. S., 1995, “A Component-Based Modeling Approach for Systems Design: Theory and Implementation,” International Conference on Bond Graph Modeling and Simulation, Las Vegas, NV.
64. Susca, L., Mandorli, F., and Rizzi, C., 2000, “How to Represent “Intelligent” Components in a Product Model: A Practical Example,” The Fourth IFIP Working Group 5.2 Workshop on Knowledge Intensive CAD (KIC-4), Parma, Italy, pp. 197-208.
65. Bettig, B., Summers, J. D., and Shah, J. J., 2000, “Geometric Examplars: A Bridge between CAD and AI,” The Fourth IFIP Working Group 5.2 Workshop on Knowledge Intensive CAD (KIC-4), Parma, Italy, pp. 57-71.
66. Neul, R., Becker, U., Lorenz, G., Schwarz, P., Haase, J., and Wünsche, S., 1998, “A Modeling Approach to Include Mechanical Microsystem Components into the System Simulation,” 1998 Design Automation and Test in Europe, Paris, France.
67. Dewey, A., Srinivasan, V., and Icoz, E., 2000, “Towards a Visual Modeling Approach to Designing Microelectromechanical System (MEMS) Transducers,” J. Micromech. Microeng., 9, pp. 332-340.
68. Romanowicz, B. F., 1998, Methodology for the Modeling and Simulation of Microsystems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
69. Mukherjee, T., and Fedder, G. K., 1999, “Hierarchical Mixed-Domain Circuit Simulation, Synthesis and Extraction Methodology for MEMS,” J. VLSI Signal Process.-Syst. Signal, Image Video Technol., 21, No. 3, pp. 233-249.
70. Hofmann, K., Lang, M., Karam, J. M., Glesner, M., and Courtois, B., 1996, “Generation O: A Behavioral Model of an Acceleration Sensor from Its Finite-Element-Description,” Third France-Japan Congress and First Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics, Besancon, France.
71. Wilson, N. M., Dutton, R. W., and Pinsky, P. M., 1999, “Investigation of Tetrahedral Automatic Mesh Generation for Finite-Element Simulation of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Switches,” International Conference on Modeling and Simulation ofMicrosystems, Semiconductors, Sensors and Actuators, San Juan, Argentina, pp. 305-308.
72. Finger, S., Konda, S., Prinz, F., Siewiorek, D., Subrahmanian, E., Tenenbaum, M., Cutkosky, M., Leifer, L., Bajcsy, R., and Birmingham, W., 1994, “Creating an Advanced Collaborative Open Resource Network,” 6th International ASME Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Minneapolis, MN.
73. Sriram, D., Logcher, R. D., Groleau, N., and Cherneff, J., 1992, “Dice: An Object-Oriented Programming Environment for Cooperative Engineering Design,” in Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design, Vol. III, T. Tong and D. Sriram, eds., Academic Press, New York, pp. 303-366.
74. Choi, K. K., Chang, K. H., Wang, J. Y., Tsai, C. S., and Steele, J. S., 1996, “A Simulation-Based Design Approach for Concurrent Engineering,” University of Iowa, Iowa City, Technical Report R96-08, November.
75. Cutkosky, M. R., Tenenbaum, J. M., and Glicksman, J., 1996, “Madefast: Collaborative Engineering over the Internet,” Commun. ACM, 39, pp. 78-87.
76. Bajaj, C., and Cutchin, S., 1999, “Web Based Collaborative Visualization of Distributed and Parallel Simulation,” 1999 IEEE Parallel Visualization and Graphics Symposium, San Francisco, California, pp. 47-54.
77. Iwasaki, Y., Farquhar, A., Fikes, R., and Rice, J., 1997, “A Web-Based Compositional Modeling System for Sharing of Physical Knowledge,” International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 494-500.
78. Lutz, R., Scrudder, R., and Graffagnini, J., 1998, “High Level Architecture Object Model Development and Supporting Tools,” Simulation, 71, pp. 401-409.
79. Park, H. C., and Kim, T. G., 1998, “A Relational Algebraic Framework for VHDL Models Management,” Trans. Soc. Comput. Simul. Int., 15, pp. 43-55.
80. Breunese, A. P. J., Top, J. L., Broenink, J. F., and Akkermans, J. M., 1998, “Library of Reusable Models: Theory and Application,” Simulation, 71, pp. 7-22.
81. Murdock, J. W., Szykman, S., and Sriram, R. D., 1997, “An Information Modeling Framework to Support Design Databases and Repositories,” 1997 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Sacramento, CA, pp. DETC97/DFM-4373. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering MARCH 2001, Vol. 1/91
82. Ozawa, M., Cutkosky, M. R., and Howley, B. J., 1998, “Model Sharing Among Agents in a Concurrent Product Development Team,” Workshop on Knowledge Intensive CAD, KIC-3, IFIP 5.2 Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 1-12.
83. Schlenoff, C., Denno, P., Ivester, R., Szykman, S., and Libes, D., 1999, “An Analysis of Existing Ontological Systems for Applications in Manufacturing,” ASME DETC 19th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, DETC99/EIM-9024.
84. Devedzic, V., 1999, “A Survey of Modern Knowledge Modeling Techniques,” Exp. Syst. Appl., 17, pp. 275-294.
85. Szykman, S., Senfaute, J., and Sriram, R. D., 1999, “The Use of XML for Describing Functions and Taxonomies in Computer-Based Design,” 19th DETC/Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, pp. DETC99/EIM-9025.
86. Szykman, S., 2000, “Design Respositories: Engineering Design’s New Knowledge Base,” IEEE Intell. Syst., 15, pp. 48-55.
87. Szykman, S., Fenves, S. J., Shooter, S. B., and Keirouz, W., 2000, “A Foundation for Interoperability in Next-Generation Product Development Systems,” 2000 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences (20th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference), Paper No. DETC2000/CIE-14622, Baltimore, MD.
88. Nguyen, H., 1998, “Model Validation and Abstraction,” HW/SW Codesign MEDEA/ESPRIT Conference, Grenoble, France.
89. Lee, K., and Fishwick, P. A., 1997, “A Semi-Automated Method for Dynamic Model Abstraction,” SPIE.
90. Hsieh, Y.-W., and Levitan, S. P., 1998, “Model Abstraction for Formal Verification,” 1998 Design Automation and Test in Europe, Paris.
91. Ozawa, M., Biswas, G., and Zhu, L., 1999, “Task Distribution and Lumped Parameter Modeling in Multi-Disciplinary Product Development,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Las Vegas, Nevada.