Comparing OECD educational models through the prism of PISA

Comparative Education

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 503-521

  Bulle, Nathalie ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVENESS; EDUCATION POLICY; NUMERICAL MODEL; OECD; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84860719949     PISSN: 03050068     EISSN: 13600486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03050068.2011.555117     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aho, E., Pitkänen, K. and Sahlberg, P. 2006. Policy development and reform principles of basic and secondary education in Finland since 1968, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
2. Ahonen, S. 2001. "The end of the common school? Change in the ethos and politics of education in Finland towards the end of the 1900s". In Nordic lights: Education for nation and civic society in the Nordic countries, 1850-2000, Edited by: Ahonen, S. and Rantala, J. 175-203. Helsinki: The Finnish Literature Society.
3. Baumert, J. 2001. "PISA 2000". In Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich, Opladen: Leske+Budrich.
4. Bodin, A. 2007. "What does PISA assess? What it doesn't? A French view". In PISA zufolge PISA. PISA according to PISA, Edited by: Hopmann, S. T., Brinek, G. and Retzl, M. 21-55. Wien: LIT-Verlag.
5. Boudon, R. 2001. "Les causes de l'inégalité des chances scolaires". In Ecole et Société-Les paradoxes de la démocratie, Edited by: Boudon, R., Bulle, N. and Cherkaoui, M. Paris: PUF.
6. Bulle, N. 2009. L'école et son double. Essai sur l'évolution pédagogique en France, Paris: Hermann.
7. Carson, J. 2001. "Defining and selecting competencies: Historical reflections on the case of IQ". In Defining and selecting key competencies, Edited by: Rychen, D. S. and Salganik, L. H. 33-44. Bern: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.
8. Cave, P. 2001. Educational reform in Japan in the 1990s: 'Individuality' and other uncertainties. Comparative Education, 37(2): 173-191.
9. Cherkaoui, M. 1979. Les paradoxes de la réussite scolaire, Sociologie comparée des systèmes d'enseignement, Paris: PUF.
10. Cresswell, J. 2004. School effectiveness, Canberra: The Australian Government Department of Education.
11. Cromley, J. G. 2009. Reading achievement and science proficiency: International comparisons from the Programme on International Student Assessment. Reading Psychology, 30(2): 89-118.
12. Demailly, J. P. 2001. Rapport au gouvernement sur l'enseignement des sciences, Paris: Institut Fourier.
13. DEPP. 2008. Lire, écrire, compter: les performances des élèves de CM2 à vingt ans d'intervalle 1987-2007. Les notes d'informationn°08.38.,
14. Dohn, N. B. 2007. Knowledge and skills for PISA-Assessing the assessment. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41(1): 1-16.
15. Duverney, D. 2006. Les spécialités au bac S: une approche historique. Gazette des mathématiciens,: 65-78.
16. Goody, J. 2001. "Competencies and education: Contextual diversity". In Defining and selecting key competencies, Edited by: Rychen, D. S. and Salganik, L. H. 174-190. Bern: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.
17. Grange, M. and Happel, J. 2005. Rapport sur l'enseignement au collège, Paris: Association des Professeurs de Lettres.
18. Kivinen, O. and Rinne, R. 1994. The thirst for learning or protecting one's niche? The shaping of teacher training in Finland during the 19th and 20th centuries. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 15(4): 515-527.
19. Kivinen, O., Rinne, R. and Simola, H. 1994. Didactic closure: Professionalization and pedagogic knowledge in Finnish teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(8): 877-891.
20. Kivirauma, J. and Ruoho, K. 2007. Excellence through special education: Lessons from the Finnish school reform. Review of Education, 53: 283-302.
21. Levin, B. 1998. An epidemic of education policy: (What) can we learn from each other?. Comparative Education, 34(2): 131-141.
22. Malaty, G. 2004. La formation des enseignants en mathématique en Finlande, Bruxelles: Les cahiers du CeDop.
23. Malaty, G. 2006. PISA results and school mathematics in Finland: Strengths, weaknesses and future, Joensuu: University of Joensuu.
24. Ministère de l'Education nationale. 2001, 2006, 2010. Repères et références statistiques sur les enseignements, la formation et la recherche, Paris: MEN.
25. Motni, Y. 2005. Hopes and challenges for progressive educators in Japan: Assessment of the 'progressive turn' in the 2002 educational reform. Comparative Education, 41(3): 309-327.
26. Norris, N., Aspland, R., McDonald, B., Schostak, J. F. and Zamorski, B. 1996. An independent evaluation of comprehensive curriculum reform in Finland, Helsinki: National Board of Education.
27. Novoa, A. and Yariv-Mashal, T. 2003. Comparative research in education: A mode of governance or a historical journey?. Comparative Education, 39(4): 423-438.
28. OECD. 2000. Connaissances et compétences: Des atouts pour la vie, Paris: OECD.
29. OECD. 2006. Where immigrant students succeed-A comparative review of performance and engagement in PISA 2003, Paris: OECD.
30. OECD. 2007. PISA 2006: Data, 2, Paris: OECD.
31. Park, H. 2006. Japanese and Korean high schools and students in comparative perspective Discussion paper
32. Prais, S. J. 2003. Cautions on OECD's recent educational survey (PISA). Oxford Review of Education, 29(2): 139-164.
33. Raynaud, P. and Thibaud, P. 1990. La fin de l'école républicaine, Paris: Calmann-Lévy.
34. Robin, D. and Barrier, E. 1985. Enquête internationale sur l'enseignement des mathématiques, Paris: INRP.
35. Salganik, L. S., Rychen, D. S. and Konstant, J. W. 1999. Projects on competencies in the OECD context, analysis of theoretical and conceptual foundations, Neuchâtel: Education Statistics Services Institute.
36. Shimizu, K. 1992. Education and selection in a Japanese middle school. Comparative Education, 28(2): 109-129.
37. Simola, H. 2005. The Finnish miracle of PISA: Historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education, 41(4): 455-470.
38. Sjøberg, S. 2007. "PISA and 'real life challenges': Mission impossible?". In PISA zufolge PISA. PISA according to PISA, Edited by: Hopmann, S. T., Brinek, G. and Retzl, M. 203-224. Wien: LIT-Verlag.
39. Stal, I. 2008. L'imposture pédagogique, Paris: Perrin.
40. Stevenson, H. W. and Stigler, J. W. 1992. The learning gap. Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education, New York: Touchstone.
41. Takayama, K. 2008. The politics of international league tables: PISA in Japan's achievement crisis debate. Comparative Education, 44(4): 387-407.
42. Uljens, M. 2007. "The hidden curriculum of PISA-The promotion of neo-liberal policy by educational assessment". In PISA zufolge PISA. PISA according to PISA, Edited by: Hopmann, S. T., Brinek, G. and Retzl, M. 295-303. Wien: LIT-Verlag.
43. Vrignaud, P. 2008. La mesure de la littératie dans PISA: La méthodologie est la réponse, mais quelle était la question?. Education et Formations, 78: 69-84.
44. Webb, R., Vulliamy, G., Hämäläinen, S., Sarja, A., Kimonen, E. and Nevalainen, R. 2004. A comparative analysis of primary teacher professionalism in England and Finland. Comparative Education, 40(1): 83-107.
45. Weinert, F. E. 2001. "Concept of competence/A conceptual clarification". In Defining and selecting key competencies, Edited by: Rychen, D. S. and Salganik, L. H. 45-66. Bern: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.